Channel
@mmajd642
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,959subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002220977141 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mmajd642 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mmajd642 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 2,959 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 2,961 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,961 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 02:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mmajd642. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
رأيتُ بعَينَي مَا أخافُه .. وعشْتُ بمُحيط لَا يَليق بِي، وَسمعتُ مَالا أريدُ أَن أَسمعَه ، وفَارقتُ مَالا أريدُ فراقَه .. ومَاتتْ الثقَه أمَامي، وانوجَعت من مَصدر أمَانِي .. ومَسحتُ دموعِي بمَاء الوضُوء، وَتقبَلت الحَياة بِكل صعوباتِها، أتظنُّ أنَنِي أُهزم ؟
بشكلٍ ما، بقيت ملامح الأحداث على قلبي!
ما ضرّني بغض خلقك فهم تُراب، وما نفعني حُب خلقك إذ هم تُراب! إن لم يَكُن بك غضبٌ عليّ فلا أُبالي.
ما في أصعَب من إنّك تقاوم شعورك! تكون عدوّ قلبك تمنع حالك تحب، وتمنع قلبك يدق .. و صعب إنّك بكل صبح بتوعى عمّ توعد حالك تكون قوي، و إنت بتعرف إنّك من جوا هَش، ضعيف بتكسرك كلمِة و كلمِة قادرة تقويّك .. صعب تحسّ ب شعور الذنب لحالك تجاه شي ما عملته بإرادتك، هوّ أنك عم تحسّ، زيادة! صعب كتيْر مع كلّ هالضّعف الظّاهر و الهشاشِة، تكون عمّ تكابِر! في جواتك أضعاف اللّي عمّ يطلع، في مخبّى أكتر من الباين .. هاد أكتر شي قادر تح…
- جبران خليل قال : ولكنك ارتضيت لي الأذى، وأنا الذي كنت أحسبك أرقُّ على قلبي مني، وهاذ كان اعمق وصف للخيبة .
مو النهاية هي يلي بتوجّع .. الوجع إنك تضل ماسك بِشي مات تدفن حالك معه! إنك تضل متمسك بِشي خلص عمره .. ارخي إيدك وكفي، يمكن يلي مستنيك أوفى، و أحلى من كل يلي مرق.
في مرحلة معينة ما عاد بيوجعك الغياب .. بصير يوجعك حالك إنك ضليت عم تحارب بصمت، بتبلّش تشوف الحقيقة بهدوء إنو الحب ما بيكفي، وإنو في ناس كانت عم تخسرك .. مفكرة إنك دايماً رح تضل! الغريب ؟ إنك ما بتبطل تحنّ .. بس بتصير تعرف إنك تستحق تحنّ لحدا يستاهلك فعلاً .
عمرك ما تفرض حالك ع حدا يلي بيعاملك ببرود تجاهلو، ويلي ما بيسأل عنك انساه ، ويلي بدو يطلع من حياتك فتحلو الباب وقلو الله وملائكته ورسله معك، بعمرك ما تعطي أهمية أو تتمسك .. بشخص معتبرك إنسان ثانوي بحياتو، بعد عن كل شخص ما بتهمو مشاعرك ومعتبرها شي عادي وبيلعب فيها، بعد عن كل شخص تركك لحالك بعز الوقت يلي كنت محتاجو فيه .. قيمة قلبك كبيرة، لذلك اختار الشخص يلي بيقدرو وبس.
يؤنسني ذلك الشعور الذي أحصل عليه عندما أنتهي من دعوات كثيرة عندما يطمئن قلبي بأنه ها أنا الآن أودعت كل ما يشغلني عند الله وعند الله لا تضيع الودائع.
كثيرة هي المرات التي قابلتُ فيها الإساءة بالود، واعتذرتُ وأنا مُدركة تماماً أني لستُ المُخطئة، أصلحتُ أشياء لم أُفسدها، وابتسمتُ في وجه شخصٍ ما صباحاً وقد كان سبب بكائي ليلة البارحة، استمعتُ لشكوى أحدهم و بداخلي غضب كبير منه، تركتُ الكثير من المواقف مُبهمة لأن توضيحها قد يؤذي الطرف الآخر، وأجدني ألوم نفسي بعد كل شجار أخوضه على أقوالي أكثر مما أُفكر بما قيل لي، تغاضيتُ عن الكثير من العبارات التي تركت أثرها فيني ولم…
شوية حروف ممكن تأخذ قلبك، لأنها من الشخص الصح، المسألة مو بكترة الحكي .
ثمة خُذلان لايكفيه أسَف .
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mmajd642. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,044,033 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ما يُشبه لَحن .” (@mmajd642), 2,959 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mmajd642.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.