Channel
@mm55555
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002133748422 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @kkkkkkkkkkvip @kucheng @mm55555 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mm55555 |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 19:57 | 4 | no change |
| 5 Oct 2026, 18:36 | 4 | no change |
| 5 Oct 2026, 11:41 | 4 | +1 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 3 | no change |
| 30 Sept 2026, 06:47 | 3 | no change |
| 30 Sept 2026, 04:22 | 3 | no change |
| 30 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 3 | +1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 2 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 1 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 20 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (20 September 2026 – 20 September 2026) |
| Views total | 102 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
NFT 官网一口价，喜欢的直接拍。🧧 更多nft用户名 @tg8tg 🇸🇰 NFT列表: 1- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- usdt 购买联系 @ganjiang 干将 @NFT899 已上链用户名1000个。 😢NFT @zouyan 走烟(走私烟) @tg8tg @tgtg8 @tgtgQ @o66666 @j66666 @p66666
1
干将 香烟专卖 ✅✅ 😀😀👍👍👍👍👍😃😃😃 😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐 柬埔寨代工厂香烟、厂家一手自发、散、件都可以优发，顶级质量只做天花板、免税走丝 📱📱📱📱 。📱📱📱📱 商超专供、欢迎各位烟友多多交流 让你们买到高品质的香烟 📱📱📱📱 📱📱📱📱 🙃🥳@ganjiangge @p8000 干将哥 香烟图片 频道 @mm55555 🥰🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄 祝各位老板发财🤫招柬埔寨 东南亚代理。
1
新品：加碳白真龙，源起
中支王之荣耀白芙蓉王
中支黑芙蓉王
芙蓉王 组闪带
芙蓉王 细支黄芙
芙蓉王 中支黄芙
合黄芙蓉王
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @mm55555. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“烟业【招代理】柬埔寨” (@mm55555), 4 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mm55555.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.