Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net +286. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,523–13,257 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 05:17
12,894
-81
19 Sept 2026, 12:21
12,975
-11
17 Sept 2026, 04:17
12,986
-27
15 Sept 2026, 07:16
13,013
-19
13 Sept 2026, 12:55
13,032
-3
11 Sept 2026, 20:37
13,035
-31
9 Sept 2026, 06:39
13,066
-12
6 Sept 2026, 02:16
13,078
-38
4 Sept 2026, 00:19
13,116
-22
2 Sept 2026, 14:13
13,138
-2
1 Sept 2026, 14:58
13,140
-7
31 Aug 2026, 11:28
13,147
-5
30 Aug 2026, 08:17
13,152
-6
29 Aug 2026, 05:41
13,158
+7
28 Aug 2026, 07:44
13,151
-9
27 Aug 2026, 10:36
13,160
+4
26 Aug 2026, 07:45
13,156
-6
25 Aug 2026, 10:09
13,162
-10
24 Aug 2026, 12:04
13,172
+28
22 Aug 2026, 22:57
13,144
first reading
Engagement
61 posts held, back to 25 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 61 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2h 02m
Average length
17m 31s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
730 reactions across 44 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
292
40.0%
❤
178
24.4%
👍
156
21.4%
❤🔥
34
4.66%
💯
21
2.88%
🙏
17
2.33%
👏
11
1.51%
⚡
9
1.23%
🤩
5
0.685%
🤝
3
0.411%
😎
2
0.274%
custom 5469904794376217131
1
0.137%
😁
1
0.137%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 730 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня, в День Знаний, мы решили отговорить вас от покупки интенсива-квеста «Сила Вали. Реактивация уснувших партнеров и клиентов». Мы внимательно проанализировали все «за» и «против», а теперь делимся с вами…
❌ Не регистрируйтесь на интенсив-квест, если вы не готовы превратить своё дело в реальный бизнес. Если для вас сетевой - это так, попробовать себя, без перспектив на будущее…
Мы построили систему квеста так,…
ПРОВЕРЬ СЕБЯ 😌
Давайте начнём эту неделю с мини-теста на знание методов работы со спящими партнерами или клиентами ✔️
Отвечайте на вопросы (правильный ответ будет указан после нажатия вами на выбранный) и смотрите, как сильно вам нужно на интенсив-квест «Сила Вали. Реактивация спящих партнеров или клиентов»: https://valentinaprokofeva.ru/valya-power ⤵️
«Сила Вали» - в практике 🧑💼
Признавайтесь, было ли у вас так: вы прошли обучение, получили приятные впечатления, вроде бы всё было интересно… а кроме этого - ничего. Ни удовлетворения от результата, ни каких-то видимых изменений. Время на курс потрачено, а толку для бизнеса ноль.
Да, такое бывает сплошь и рядом.
Но происходит это только потому, что курсы остаются теорией и не претворяются в жизнь. Именно поэтому о…
«Сила Вали» - в креативности 🪄
Сетевые предприниматели проходят огромное количество обучений. Они учатся, слушают, конспектируют, выполняют задания… И как никто другой знают, что часть этих обучений так и остаётся «на полках».
Потому что, открывая очередной урок и слыша нудную лекцию, выполняя скучные задания, совершенно не хочется возвращаться к такому обучению.
В лучшем случае оно просто прослушивается. В худшем …
😭 КАК ВЫЙТИ ИЗ ЗАСТОЯ, КОГДА КОМАНДА НЕ РАСТЁТ И ТЫ ТОПЧЕШЬСЯ НА МЕСТЕ 2 ГОДА?
Вчера проводила традиционные бизнес-разборы в своем Клубе дипломированных наставников. И именно этот вопрос от одного из участников зацепил меня больше всего.
После моего ответа наставники начали писать, что это нужно транскрибировать, чтобы отправить своим партнерам 🥹
И я подумала: возможно, и вам сейчас важно услышать эти слова, чтобы…
😳 Я ПРОВЕЛА НЕЗАВИСИМЫЙ АУДИТ ИНТЕНСИВА «СИЛА ВАЛИ»
И нашла сразу несколько причин, по которым участники могут остаться недовольны проектом. Решила честно обо всём рассказать 🙌🏻
❌ Недостаток №1
Не получится сказать: «Я бы посмотрела урок, но у меня вообще нет времени», потому что уроки длятся всего по 5–15 минут.
И не потому, что мне жалко информации. Наоборот, подготовить такую «выжимку» гораздо сложнее, чем зап…
«Сила Вали» - в системе 🧩
Я уже неоднократно говорила о том, что бизнес не строится на хаосе. Не строится на разрозненных инструментах.
Можно знать и освоить десятки тысяч способов работы, но если они не сочетаются друг с другом, если один инструмент не является продолжением другого, смысла в этом нет🙈 Потому что в голове всё равно не складывается понимание, нет ндиной картинки.
Именно поэтому на интенсиве-квесте,…
🔥3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @mlm_intensive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mlm_intensive edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кого можно считать «спящим» партнером или клиентом?
Того, кто зарегистрировался/один раз купил и пропал.4%
Того, кто решил, что сетевой бизнес - не его и прекратил свою работу.2%
Того, кто какое-то время был активен, а потом «потух».35%
Все варианты верны.60%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Наталья Грэйс @nataliagrace · 33,339 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 4 September 2026
Fabula AI • Нейросеть для селлеров @fabula_community · 124,789 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 27 August 2026
Новости Атоми Россия @atomyrusofficial · 58,682 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 29 August 2026
EWA PRODUCT @ewaproduct · 23,307 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 21 September 2026
🔉Siberian Wellness MLM @siberianwellnessnews · 20,184 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 29 September 2026
Татьяна Другова.Полезности в моменте @tatyanadrugova · 42,090 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Девочки, про кремики хотите? @devochkamprokremiki · 31,177 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 8 September 2026
Siberian Wellness. PRO БАД @rusiberianwellness · 83,542 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
Предзапись в институт МИФИМ 🎓 @doctor_zubareva_brand · 19,471 Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 October 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МЛМ ИНТЕНСИВ” (@mlm_intensive), 12,894 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mlm_intensive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.