Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MineLegend | Канал

Channel

MineLegend | Канал

@mlegend_tg

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

64subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002400272653
TypeChannel
Username@mlegend_tg
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/mlegend_tg

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6365647 August 2026 — 65 subscribers10 August 2026 — 65 subscribers24 August 2026 — 64 subscribers1 October 2026 — 63 subscribers11 October 2026 — 64 subscribers7 August 202611 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 65 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63–65 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Oct 2026, 16:5964+1
1 Oct 2026, 11:1963-1
24 Aug 2026, 00:1264-1
10 Aug 2026, 02:4565no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:0965first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

73 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😭2432.9%
❤1419.2%
👍1013.7%
🔥79.59%
🤮68.22%
😢34.11%
🍾22.74%
👎22.74%
💩22.74%
😱11.37%
🤪11.37%
🥰11.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2025 to 19 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Feb 2026, 14:55 UTC105 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @BeliaevXVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍1

19 Feb 2026, 14:55 UTC111 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @BeliaevXVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍1

19 Feb 2026, 14:55 UTC115 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @BeliaevXVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍1

19 Feb 2026, 14:55 UTC146 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @BeliaevXVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍1

19 Feb 2026, 14:55 UTC154 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @BeliaevXVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍1

19 Feb 2026, 14:55 UTC154 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @BeliaevXVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍1

12 Feb 2026, 13:06 UTC114 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @BeliaevXPoll

Привет! Чувствуешь ли ты что твоя жизнь улучшилась после просмотра моего крайнего видео?

  1. Да! Словно теперь удача на моей стороне27%
  2. Видео смотрел(а), но изменений пока не замечаю33%
  3. Еще не смотрел(а) видео33%
  4. Свой вариант в комментах7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Feb 2026, 20:59 UTC127 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @BeliaevX

Всем привет. Я по своему опыту знаю, что для достижения успеха и лучшей жизни очень важны люди, с которыми ты контактируешь каждый день. Когда я делал игровые проекты, я достигал успеха именно благодаря тому, что общался с теми, кто уже был успешен — они давали мне ценные советы. Именно поэтому я сейчас работаю над новым пространством для вас, где мы сможем объединиться. Там будет общий чат и специальные ветки, где …

7 Feb 2026, 16:26 UTC111 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @BeliaevXPhoto

Все привыкли думать, что успех — это результат пота, борьбы и бесконечного «надо». Мы бежим за этой морковкой, надеясь, что вот-вот станет легче. Но правда в том, что пока внутри тебя живет сигнал дефицита, мир будет зеркалить тебе только нехватку. Даже если у тебя будут миллионы, дыра внутри никуда не денется. Ты так и останешься в ловушке «недостаточности». В новом видео я раскрыл систему, которая позволила мне в…

30 Jan 2026, 15:44 UTC161 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Я поднялся на вершину с xKONx и MineLegend, но в Америке я пробил дно и потерял абсолютно всё. Это не просто видео — это мой личный приговор неправильному мышлению и отсутствию дисциплины. Я честно показываю, как одна ошибка в голове может стоить тебе всего, что ты строил годами. Смотри этот сюжет, чтобы не повторять моих ошибок. Мы начинаем строить заново. Залетай - https://youtu.be/YkA_XoTAQIo

14 Jun 2025, 22:19 UTC584 views32 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Дорогие друзья, к вам обращаюсь я xKONx мне трудно и больно это писать но я принял решение, MineLegend завершает свое существование как проект Minecraft. В последние месяцы я тянул проект как мог, но сейчас осознал что пора отпустить и двигаться дальше... Я благодарен каждому из вас за вашу игру на проекте, за ваши сообщения, за вашу поддержку и эмоции. Если ты читаешь это сообщение будь уверен, тебя здесь помнят! Mi…

😭24🤮6😢2

13 Jun 2025, 21:08 UTC404 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Наш сервер закрыт на Обновение и Вайп. 📍Открытие 15 июня.

❤4👎2🤪1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mlegend_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Feb 2026, 13:06 UTCAnonymous Poll30 voters

Привет! Чувствуешь ли ты что твоя жизнь улучшилась после просмотра моего крайнего видео?

  1. Да! Словно теперь удача на моей стороне27%
  2. Видео смотрел(а), но изменений пока не замечаю33%
  3. Еще не смотрел(а) видео33%
  4. Свой вариант в комментах7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 May 2025, 07:09 UTCAnonymous Poll103 voters

С какого года работает наш сервер?

  1. 20244%
  2. 201916%
  3. 201562%
  4. 201218%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2025 to 19 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MineLegend | Канал” (@mlegend_tg), 64 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mlegend_tg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.