Channel
@mkaarbat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
229subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001680270798 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mkaarbat |
| Description | Московская коллегия адвокатов «Арбат» 🔝команда юристов и адвокатов для бизнеса ЖКХ, налоги, банкротство, GR, цифровые активы, АПК http://mkaarbat.ru |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mkaarbat |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 229 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 229 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 February 2026 – 24 July 2026) |
| Views total | 640 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
184 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 56 | 30.4% | |
| 🔥 | 49 | 26.6% | |
| 👏 | 31 | 16.8% | |
| 🥰 | 21 | 11.4% | |
| ⚡ | 9 | 4.89% | |
| custom 5386817900415829672 | 7 | 3.80% | |
| ✍ | 5 | 2.72% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.63% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.63% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mkaarbat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 February 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Петербург, который мы так долго ждали! 📌 Наша долгожданная встреча в Санкт-Петербурге началась с особенной экскурсии по Голландской церкви. Участники познакомились с историей этого уникального места и услышали органный концерт на инструменте, который был привезен напрямую из Голландии. ↪️ После экскурсии началась официальная часть – закрытый ланч для юристов и адвокатов. Мы познакомились с петербургскими коллегам…
👍1🔥1🥰1
Можно ли оспорить кадастровую стоимость, если она уже стала архивной? Конституционный Суд РФ рассмотрел жалобы двух собственников недвижимости. Налоговые органы рассчитали их обязательства исходя из кадастровой стоимости, которая в несколько раз превышала рыночную. Однако к моменту получения налоговых уведомлений эта стоимость уже стала архивной, а срок для обращения в уполномоченное бюджетное учреждение истёк. В …
🔥4🥰4👍3
Банкротство РСО: почему стандартные решения здесь не работают? Банкротство ресурсоснабжающей организации – не просто спор о долгах между должником и кредиторами. В сфере теплоснабжения любое решение может затронуть работу котельных и тепловых сетей, а значит напрямую повлиять на жизнеобеспечение граждан. 👨 Алексей Симоненко, старший партнёр МКА «Арбат», рассматривает, почему при банкротстве таких организаций необхо…
🔥3👍2👏2
Госнужды или частный интерес? 📌 В порту «Тамань» рассматривается спор об изъятии у компании «Газконтрактинвест» около 16 га земли для реализации концессионного соглашения. Земельный участок был предусмотрен под строительство железнодорожной и иной инфраструктуры, которая связана с перевалкой сельхозпродукции. Однако собственник считает, что землю изымают не для государственных нужд, а в интересах частных холдингов…
👏5👍4🔥4
Репутация строится делами: МКА «Арбат» отмечена в профессиональном рейтинге 📌 24 июня в Санкт-Петербурге прошла IV Конференция «Юридический маркетинг и менеджмент». В рамках конференции были представлены результаты Консолидированного рейтинга коммуникационно-репутационного капитала юридического рынка Москвы и Санкт-Петербурга — 2026. Этот рейтинг отмечает юридические команды, которые системно развивают репутацию, …
👏6🔥6👍5
МКА Арбат pinned a photo
Прямой диалог власти, рынка и собственников 📌 19 июня 2026 года прошел круглый стол «Комплексное развитие территорий в Московской области: практика применения, защита прав собственников и инфраструктурные эффекты». В центре обсуждения оказались практические вопросы реализации механизмов комплексного развития территорий в Московской области: 🔘как КРТ работает на практике, 🔘какие сложности возникают при реализации пр…
👍3🔥3🥰2⚡1
МКА «Арбат» едет в Санкт-Петербург! Мы с особым теплом возвращаемся к профессиональному диалогу с петербургскими коллегами. 📍 Санкт-Петербург для нас не просто новая точка на карте, ведь здесь: 🔵работает наш филиал, 🔵формируется сильное юридическое сообщество, где всегда есть место честному разговору о профессии, практике, клиентах, гонорарах и развитии юридического бизнеса. 📌 24 июля мы проведём в Петербурге закр…
✍3🔥3👍2🥰2custom 53868179004158296721
КС подтвердил передачу прав льготной аренды земли Поводом для рассмотрения дела стал спор вокруг земельного участка, который был предоставлен ветерану труда в аренду на льготных условиях (без торгов и сроком на 15 лет). Спустя два года арендатор передал свои права и обязанности по договору другому лицу, уведомив об этом муниципалитет. Орган МСУ попытался оспорить такую передачу с указанием, что льготный участок не…
👍3👏3✍2
Предприниматели восстановили завод из руин – теперь оспаривают изъятие История началась более 20 лет назад: предприниматели приобрели заброшенные здания бывшего завода ЖБИ, восстановили территорию, провели масштабную реконструкцию, вложили в объект значительные средства и запустили производство. Завод стал единственным в Зауралье кожевенным производством, создавал рабочие места и выходил на экспортные поставки. В 2…
👍4👏3⚡1
Как изменилось изъятие недвижимости для государственных нужд в 2026 году? 👑 В Газета.Ru вышла авторская статья Александра Крылова, адвоката и руководителя практики землепользования МКА «Арбат». Материал посвящен важным изменениям в порядке изъятия недвижимости для государственных и муниципальных нужд после постановления Конституционного суда РФ №22-П от 9 апреля 2026 года. Раньше на практике собственники нередко с…
🔥4👍3👏3
Когда право на землю есть только на бумаге 📌Верховный Суд РФ рассмотрел спор собственников помещений в апарт-комплексе в Сочи, которым фактически отказали во вступлении в договор аренды земельного участка под зданием. Нижестоящие суды посчитали, что истцы выбрали «ненадлежащий способ защиты», а также указали на отсутствие согласованных долей и порядка пользования участком. Ситуация выглядела парадоксально: люди пр…
👍3👏3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mkaarbat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 121,486 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МКА Арбат” (@mkaarbat), 229 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mkaarbat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.