Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 六六朋友圈

Channel

六六朋友圈

@mj000357

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

188subscribers

+148 since we began measuring on 23 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003818703947
TypeChannel
Username@mj000357
Created22 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded23 October 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/mj000357

Growth

4018811423 October 2026 — 40 subscribers24 October 2026 — 63 subscribers30 October 2026 — 170 subscribers6 November 2026 — 188 subscribers23 October 20266 November 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days, net +148. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18–210 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 13:16188+18
30 Oct 2026, 11:55170+107
24 Oct 2026, 06:3863+23
23 Oct 2026, 16:2240first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 22 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
62.8%
avg views ÷ 188 subscribers
Avg views / post
118
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
5
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026
Posts held5 (22 October 2026 – 23 October 2026)
Views total354
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Oct 2026, 16:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

23 Oct 2026, 11:16 UTC63 viewsread 23 October 2026
Forwarded from @xianlycpPhoto

【评价等级】: 👍 好评 【日 期】: 2026-10-23 【验 证 人】: 匿名 【美女昵称】: 六六 【地 区】: 延平门 【人照得分】: 9.5 【颜值得分】: 9.5 【身材得分】:9 【服务得分】: 10 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 9.5 【年 龄】: 18 【凶 器】: b 【服务过程】: 到了约定的时间,遥控上楼,推开门老师热情迎接,青春中带着点可爱,看着年纪小刚刚18岁,穿的紧身的短裙,第一印象身段不错。洗完后,老师让挑选丝袜,挑了一双黑丝,曼妙的身段若隐若现,一双桃花眼,含情脉脉,老师主动,配合,热情,到了口的环节,跟老师来了69互动,水挺多,老师的口活也很棒,无齿感,时而温柔,时而霸道,小嘴深深地吸着,感觉马上就要喷涌而出,果断喊停,怕女上被秒,赶紧让老师躺下,开始进去,挺紧,很润。老师也很投入,我们身心合一,加速输…

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @mj000357. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“六六朋友圈” (@mj000357), 188 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mj000357.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.