Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for beautiful moon|Мизуки|18+

Channel

beautiful moon|Мизуки|18+

@mizukicosp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

230subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002107613811
TypeChannel
Username@mizukicosp
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mizukicosp

Growth

230231230.56 August 2026 — 231 subscribers7 August 2026 — 231 subscribers13 August 2026 — 230 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 230–231 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:26230-1
7 Aug 2026, 02:48231no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:24231first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
55.2%
avg views ÷ 230 subscribers
Avg views / post
127
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held9 (25 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,016
Reactions total44
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 3 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54201641854157765241534.1%
❤‍🔥818.2%
💋818.2%
👍511.4%
49.09%
🤯24.55%
💔12.27%
😭12.27%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC147 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🤩🔤🔤🔤🔤 — Обычно люди не показывают своё истинное лицо, пока не напьются. Развязный, сладкоречивый язык Кэйи - уловка, от которой несёт притворством. Но я-то вижу его насквозь. 🤩🤩🤩 🐎Kaeya Alberich 🤩Ph by Dem #genshinimpact #photoshoot #Rosaria #Kaeya

custom 54201641854157765249❤‍🔥8👍5💋4

5 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC66 viewsread 7 August 2026

напоминаю, активно ищем людей для проекта! список обновился! 🥰

31 Jul 2026, 05:05 UTC160 viewsread 7 August 2026

коротко о ситуации, где фотки парика, сделанного мне золотыми ручками HoneyBee просто кто-то украл для своих "продаж". ну вообще кринж 😈

31 Jul 2026, 05:03 UTC113 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @honeybeewigsPhoto

Айм сори, но если вы сидите в инсте то вероятно видели тот трындец с воровством крупной мастерской (Morojowig) чужих фоток и продажей коммишек, но пока это не касалось меня я просто наблюдала Кому захочется углубиться в лор, пострадали такие киты париков как UmbraWigs, Rentchan, у моей наставницы WisperiaWorkshop тоже украли фотки и еще у ребят с Редноута, а когда вычислили кражу то просто всех перебанили. Но тут м

🤯2💔1😭1

30 Jul 2026, 05:54 UTC109 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @taticas_phPhoto

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 Character: Yae Miko Model: Mizuki_cos Phsh: me 🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 #portfolio

custom 542016418541577652464💋4

25 Jul 2026, 17:14 UTC148 viewsread 7 August 2026

извиняюсь, что пишу так поздно, но в ближайшее время постов не будет совсем, т.к. я лежу в больнице после операции, пытаюсь восстановиться. извините ребят, хотела увидеться со всеми на фестивалях сегодня и завтра, но не судьба(

25 Jul 2026, 09:57 UTC162 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kirlakillPhoto

РЕПОСТ/ РАСПРОСТРАНЕНИЕ приветствуется.. Не думала, что до этого рано или поздно дойдет, но, похоже, пришло время. Сейчас у нас в жизни происходят ужасные и неприятные вещи: нас выгоняют с квартиры с больным животным. У кошечки, которую мы взяли с авито, обнаружили запущенный бактериальный бронхит. Прошлые хозяева не лечили еë от слова совсем, что привело к запущенности состояния и развившимся проблемам с лёгкими.

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @mizukicosp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 92,572 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“beautiful moon|Мизуки|18+” (@mizukicosp), 230 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mizukicosp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.