Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

миу rest

@miuwtf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,032subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002390733413
TypeChannel
Username@miuwtf
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/miuwtf

Growth

1,0321,0331,032.510 Aug 2026, 13:02 — 1,033 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 08:28 — 1,032 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 13:0211 Aug 2026, 08:28
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,032–1,033 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 08:281,032-1
10 Aug 2026, 13:021,033first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.0%
avg views ÷ 1,032 subscribers
Avg views / post
485
1 post measured
Reaction rate
31.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held14 (4 June 202621 July 2026)
Views total485
Reactions total152
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,959 reactions across 14 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
44322.6%
💘40820.8%
🍓23912.2%
❤‍🔥1748.88%
💋1688.58%
custom 57740925803503328501246.33%
custom 52042180315463396141135.77%
👀633.22%
custom 5474420557350994214582.96%
🎉432.19%
🔥402.04%
🙏241.23%
custom 5422439315491817077231.17%
custom 5237790785876825166190.97%
custom 5422557551646507468110.562%
custom 542472084506911924780.408%
🆒10.051%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,959reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 14 we hold a reading for · 36%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @miuwtf. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 June 2026 to 21 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC485 views152 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

кмм одна из пяти #мш я чувствую физически деградацию

custom 577409258035033285092🍓26💋24💘63❤‍🔥1

14 Jul 2026, 19:11 UTC797 views131 reactions4 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

коллаб с моим брочачо , который мы не могли доделать несколько месяцев, потому что у меня 42 айкью ⚠️ПОДПЫСКУ НА ТИВИСТЕ ОФОРМИТЕ СРОЧНО⚠️ t.me/tiivistesinetti ( он сугимото рисовал 🥺) На Санкт-Петербург проливается "Золотой дождь", и "Белая ночь" подходит к концу.🥺🙏 пришло время насладиться "Золотым дождем эпохи Камуи", используйте емкости, чтобы эти "дождевые гранулы"💧💦 попадали вам в рот. тогда вы сможете ощутит

65custom 577409258035033285032💘25🍓5❤‍🔥4

Signed t.me/миувтф

12 Jul 2026, 09:09 UTC960 views264 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#дельта

🍓161💋43💘359custom 54247208450691192478❤‍🔥4🙏3🔥1

Signed t.me/миувтф

10 Jul 2026, 14:47 UTC991 views154 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

маменькин сырок #ос 🌟 картинки с июня — белы чел ос муты

💘88🍓37custom 5237790785876825166196🎉2💋2

Signed t.me/миувтф

6 Jul 2026, 09:31 UTC900 views44 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @verdiastudPhoto

‼️💙💙💙💙💙💙‼️ СРОЧНО НУЖНЫ ДЕНЬГИ ДЛЯ ОПЛАТЫ СЧЕТОВ ВЕТЕРИНАРНОЙ КЛИНИКИ В РАЗМЕРЕ 902,87€ грн/доллар/евро ПОСТ СБОР/ЗАКАЗ РИСУНКА - https://t.me/verdiastud/65 ТГК - @VERDIASTUD ОПИСАНИЕ СИТУАЦИИ: Мне очень тяжело обращаться за помощью к людям, но сейчас у меня всё очень плохо с финансами. На прикрепленных документах вы можете увидеть диагнозы и путь лечения моего кота, а также счета и требуемые суммы. У него была

💘25🙏133🍓2🔥1

Signed миу ватахєеел

2 Jul 2026, 09:04 UTC≈1,060 views169 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

дельтасрун глава 5 спойлеры крис в сарафанчике #дельта я потерял стилус после этой картинки сос

96❤‍🔥36custom 542243931549181707723🙏7💘4🍓3

Signed миу ватахєеел

25 Jun 2026, 13:08 UTC≈1,190 views183 reactions6 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

редрав моей самой любимой картинки за всё время что я рисую оригинал все равно лучше имхо ПРАЙМ ДЕЛЬТАСРУН ЭРЫ ВОЗВРАЩАЕТСЯ🟣 #дельта

💋99💘33🎉27custom 5422557551646507468119🍓4

Signed миу ватахєеел

18 Jun 2026, 14:41 UTC≈1,340 views249 reactions5 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

хочу похвастаться че нарисовала для будущего брелка себе и муте любимк! синенький чел - не мой персонаж , а муты #ос

❤‍🔥129custom 547442055735099421458💘499🎉3🍓1

Signed миу ватахєеел

12 Jun 2026, 17:18 UTC≈1,470 views122 reactionsread 10 August 2026

возможно майшмилда станет меньше я чета немножко выгорела к этому фандому особенно если вы тут ТОЛЬКО ради орео жф пейрингов машмилд красивые картинки то можете отписываться я конечно расстроюсь но не велика беда а те кому я нравлюсь как художник в целом и вам похуй на контент оставайтесь вы мои любимые подписчики конечно не хотелосб бы скатиться до 900 обратно но уж как будет я не думаю что полностью ливаю с фд в

💘7127👀19custom 52042180315463396145

Signed миу ватахєеел

12 Jun 2026, 17:11 UTC≈1,470 views191 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

солянка хуйни полугодовалой и недельной давности на которую нет сил и я не хочу выкладывать это адекватно #ос #мш бели чел перс муты

115custom 520421803154633961437👀26💘12🙏1

Signed миу ватахєеел

7 Jun 2026, 19:50 UTC≈1,610 views124 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

гифт на день рождения моего дорогово товареща и крутого художнека TIIVISTE-SINETTITIIVISTE-SINETTI. бро накормил меня додо пиццей за свой счёт, похвалим и поздравим его через 1 час 10 минут

custom 52042180315463396147128👀18💘4🎉2🆒1

Signed миу

4 Jun 2026, 13:49 UTC≈1,300 views58 reactionsread 10 August 2026

щас в коммы под ЭТИМ же постом скину скрины кому интересно посмотрите я не хочу особо тут всем этим светить кому надо тот поржет на этом история закончена, удалять ниче не буду

💘4711

Signed миу

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @miuwtf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 953,628 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“миу rest” (@miuwtf), 1,032 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miuwtf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.