Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🦹🏻‍♂️ Митя в Голливуде

@mitya_kovalev

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,350subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001146321798
TypeChannel
Username@mitya_kovalev
DescriptionРефлексирую о работе в Америке и жизни в Лос-Анджелесе. Связь: @mityakov / Инста: instagram.com/mityakov
Created8 September 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mitya_kovalev

Growth

5,3505,3525,3516 August 2026 — 5,352 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,351 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,350 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,350–5,352 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 22:115,350-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:205,351-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:225,352first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 9 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
296
Videos
32
Links
317

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

854 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
40447.3%
🔥21324.9%
👍12214.3%
😁708.20%
🤯252.93%
👎151.76%
🤔50.585%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 854reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2025 to 22 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 16 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mitya_kovalev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 December 2025 to 22 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 May 2026, 04:40 UTC≈1,360 views70 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сходил на предпоказ первых серий нового сериала Амазона SPIDER-NOIR с Николасом Кейджем. Понравилось. Дико необычно видеть Спайдермена подбухивающим безработным частным сыщиком средних лет. Изначально планировалось, что сериал будет полностью черно-белым, но в итоге выйдет сразу две версии — черно-белая и цветная. Мне стало интересно, почему. После целых двух (!) панелей с ответами на вопросы IndieWire, где сквозно

40🔥19👍9😁2

27 Apr 2026, 16:05 UTC≈1,800 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ролик с Valerie Zhang. Длинная версия. https://youtu.be/quDkpdEIx8Q?si=hjUIyiobb4_1eSLu

🔥164🤔1😁1

27 Apr 2026, 16:04 UTC≈1,520 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ролик с Kenigra Deon. Длинная версия. https://youtu.be/O1C92teu7bk?si=sntNdDEPAIdFFDgw

🔥193🤔1

27 Apr 2026, 16:04 UTC≈1,460 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Как однажды сказал мой друг Гена — реклама умеет ждать. Дождалась. На днях вышла первая часть большой кампании для Adobe Firefly, на которой я номинально был associate creative director, а фактически совмещал несколько ролей — креатива, ИИ-художника (почти все генерации — мои), режиссера анимации интерфейсов и немного VFX. Одной из моих главных задач было обеспечить, чтобы интерфейсы, генерации и workflow были правд

10👍7🔥7

24 Apr 2026, 20:39 UTC≈1,500 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @iateusPhoto

CG ПОДКАСТ №1 Терапевтический подкаст о компьютерной графике https://youtu.be/rgcDSjYRg0Q https://youtu.be/rgcDSjYRg0Q https://youtu.be/rgcDSjYRg0Q Обсудить в @cgchatnumberone Подпишись на наш YouTube, чтобы не пропустить новые выпуски: youtube.com/@cgpodcastone

23

24 Apr 2026, 20:39 UTC≈1,420 views14 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Посреди бесконечных рабочих будней зашел в гости в подкаст Игоря Восемь поговорить о жизни и обсудить новости. Enjoy!

🔥14

2 Mar 2026, 06:05 UTC≈2,470 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Еще одна недавняя работа, но в этот раз не вышедшая в эфир. Оказалась слишком смелой для клиента, поэтому пошла прямиком в портфолио. Nano Banana Pro, Veo 3.1, Premiere Pro https://youtube.com/shorts/tb4M30Q7YF0?si=oJEU5hu50KtA6EPZ

🔥246👍4👎2🤔1

23 Feb 2026, 06:00 UTC≈2,870 views77 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

С радостью делюсь свежим режиссерским проектом, который стал для меня ярким началом этого года. Это рекламный ролик на период Рамадана для египетского рынка для inDrive, созданный почти полностью в нейронках (но — людьми). В основе музыкального трека — древнеегипетский напев Wahawy Ya Wahawy, переосмысленный и исполненный молодой египетской звездой Donia Wael. Она же открывает ролик — это единственный кадр, снятый вж

45🔥27👎3👍2

27 Jan 2026, 01:21 UTC≈3,010 views82 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Обнаружил текстовый (!) файл размером почти 120Гб, куда DaVinci Resolve сохранял лог своих крашей. По ощущениям — как найти $100 в кармане прошлогоднего пальто. Вот путь: ~/Library/Application Support/Blackmagic Design/DaVinci Resolve

😁41🤯25🔥122👍2

23 Jan 2026, 00:16 UTC≈3,530 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Очень здорово, что Эми Мадиган (Гладис в Weapons) номинирована на Оскар. Несмотря на то, что Шон Пенн тоже абсолютно заслуженно номинирован за свою гениальную игру в OBAA, за Эми я почему-то рад в особенности (наверное, потому что актеров для такой роли единицы). https://www.oscars.org/oscars/ceremonies/2026 А вам как номинации? Сюрпризы? Разочарования?

33👍2

25 Dec 2025, 06:33 UTC≈3,750 views151 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Примерно в эти даты пять лет назад, потягивая красненькое со своим другом на кухне в доме, в котором я тогда временно жил, я сказал фразу, от которой мне самому стало неуютно: «понятия не имею, где я буду жить и чем буду заниматься через год». Это было правдой. Я тогда только выпустился из киношколы и перспективы были неутешительные: киноиндустрия еще не начала оправляться от ковида, намеков на работу у меня даже не

120👍21🔥10

19 Dec 2025, 01:03 UTC≈3,060 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

А вот и последний проект этого года. В этот раз — запилили за два дня. Как делал предыдущий и этот — скоро расскажу, обещаю. https://www.instagram.com/p/DSbLyiUCXxB/

14🔥12👍4🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @mitya_kovalev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 349,022 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🦹🏻‍♂️ Митя в Голливуде” (@mitya_kovalev), 5,350 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mitya_kovalev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.