Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Misterios Ocultos

Channel

Misterios Ocultos

@misterios_ocultos_channel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

31,030subscribers

+188 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001585556052
TypeChannel
Username@misterios_ocultos_channel
Description¡Bienvenidos a Misterios Ocultos! Un refugio para los amantes de lo sobrenatural. Explora historias escalofriantes sobre fantasmas y fenómenos inexplicables que desafían la lógica. ¿Te atreves a acompañarnos?
Created10 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/misterios_ocultos_channel

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

30,70031,72931,214.57 August 2026 — 30,842 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,819 subscribers9 August 2026 — 30,785 subscribers10 August 2026 — 30,758 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,731 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,700 subscribers13 August 2026 — 31,242 subscribers14 August 2026 — 31,200 subscribers15 August 2026 — 31,164 subscribers17 August 2026 — 31,125 subscribers18 August 2026 — 31,078 subscribers19 August 2026 — 31,086 subscribers20 August 2026 — 31,729 subscribers21 August 2026 — 31,703 subscribers23 August 2026 — 31,479 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30,936 subscribers26 August 2026 — 31,283 subscribers26 August 2026 — 31,260 subscribers27 August 2026 — 31,245 subscribers28 August 2026 — 31,225 subscribers29 August 2026 — 31,077 subscribers30 August 2026 — 31,060 subscribers31 August 2026 — 31,044 subscribers1 September 2026 — 31,004 subscribers2 September 2026 — 30,970 subscribers4 September 2026 — 30,952 subscribers6 September 2026 — 30,898 subscribers10 September 2026 — 30,794 subscribers12 September 2026 — 30,766 subscribers14 September 2026 — 30,755 subscribers15 September 2026 — 31,076 subscribers17 September 2026 — 31,030 subscribers31,0307 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net +188. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,546–31,883 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 22:0031,030-46
15 Sept 2026, 19:3831,076+321
14 Sept 2026, 01:3930,755-11
12 Sept 2026, 08:3930,766-28
10 Sept 2026, 02:1630,794-104
6 Sept 2026, 16:1730,898-54
4 Sept 2026, 02:3830,952-18
2 Sept 2026, 18:1630,970-34
1 Sept 2026, 15:3531,004-40
31 Aug 2026, 17:4831,044-16
30 Aug 2026, 20:4631,060-17
29 Aug 2026, 23:3731,077-148
28 Aug 2026, 23:3431,225-20
27 Aug 2026, 22:1431,245-15
26 Aug 2026, 23:2431,260-23
26 Aug 2026, 00:3331,283+347
25 Aug 2026, 00:3730,936-543
23 Aug 2026, 12:5631,479-224
21 Aug 2026, 20:2831,703-26
20 Aug 2026, 16:2231,729first reading

Engagement

64 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.1%
avg views ÷ 31,030 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,000
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 64 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held64 (22 July 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total134,919
Reactions total1,848
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Sept 2026, 21:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
581
Videos
204
Links
649

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
27m 05s
Average length
52s

Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,461 reactions across 64 posts, in 50 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤔1,57135.2%
👍96021.5%
❤58013.0%
🤯1974.42%
🤡1463.27%
👾1413.16%
😱1292.89%
🤣1072.40%
👏902.02%
👀741.66%
😁701.57%
🤬501.12%
😨330.74%
🤨310.695%
🤮300.672%
👻290.65%
🥱290.65%
👎210.471%
🔥190.426%
😴190.426%
30 further kinds1353.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,461 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Sept 2026, 19:53 UTC949 views19 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Video

El gesto de Trump después de estrechar la mano con Zelenski es una protección masónica contra la mala suerte antes de las elecciones intermedias, según expertos. 💀¡Descubre aquí los Misterios Ocultos!💀

🤡16😁2❤1

24 Sept 2026, 19:08 UTC≈1,780 views34 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Video

Beroso y la profecía de los planetas alineados 🌌 Beroso, sacerdote babilonio de Bel/Marduk y autor del siglo IV-III a. C., sostenía que los grandes cataclismos dependían del curso de los planetas. Según su relato, el mundo ardería cuando todos se reunieran en Cáncer, mientras que un nuevo Diluvio ocurriría durante la misma conjunción en Capricornio. El autor de la publicación afirma haber localizado una alineación …

🤔23❤6👍5

23 Sept 2026, 18:09 UTC≈2,430 views61 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Video

Oficial desaparece de cámara a bordo del ARA Libertad Un equipo de televisión argentino entrevistaba a una oficial en la cubierta del buque escuela ARA Libertad, a su regreso de un viaje de cinco meses. Al terminar, la oficial sonríe, se da vuelta para alejarse y la cámara la pierde entre las personas que cruzan la cubierta. Permanece visible y luego desaparece en unos 15 segundos. El momento se volvió viral y cerr…

🥱24🤯13🤔10❤5😁5👍4

22 Sept 2026, 18:31 UTC≈3,040 views66 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Video

🪰 Un androide controlado por neuronas de mosca Una publicación en X afirma que 166.700 neuronas reconstruidas de mosca fueron conectadas a un androide para estudiar el movimiento. El sistema debía responder a estímulos de una cámara, pero supuestamente comenzó a girarse hacia las personas antes de que estas tocaran el dispositivo y a cerrar la mano cuando alguien se acercaba. Según el relato, al desconectar las con…

🤔44👍10🤣7❤2👏2🤡1

21 Sept 2026, 14:06 UTC≈3,530 views72 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Video

🛸 Objeto luminoso multicolor sobre Teherán Varias grabaciones difundidas desde Teherán, Irán, muestran un objeto luminoso con diferentes colores desplazándose por el cielo. Las imágenes no incluyen una identificación oficial del fenómeno ni permiten determinar su tamaño, distancia o naturaleza. Ninguna autoridad iraní se ha pronunciado oficialmente sobre el objeto. ¿Se trata de un dron, un fenómeno atmosférico, un …

🤔50🤡12❤7👍2👾1

19 Sept 2026, 19:04 UTC≈4,360 views56 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

Un mensaje pompeyano antes de la catástrofe Una de las últimas inscripciones antes de la erupción del Vesubio, el 24 de octubre del 79 d.C., fue descubierta en la excavación IX.14.36: la inscripción en tinta de carbón "Nolo cum Myrtal" está grabada directamente en un bloque de piedra caliza de la pared de una taberna. Durante mucho tiempo, la inscripción no llamó la atención, pero el análisis de las micropartículas…

👍25🤔16❤8👏4🔥3

18 Sept 2026, 19:31 UTC≈4,810 views61 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

🛰️ 3I/ATLAS: ¿fragmento cósmico o nave ancestral? El objeto 3I/ATLAS ha sido presentado por algunos teóricos como algo más que un fragmento errante del espacio. Según estas especulaciones, podría tratarse de una nave lanzada hace miles de millones de años por una civilización anterior a la vida compleja en la Tierra. Algunos interpretan su trayectoria como la de una sonda de observación; otros, como la de un arca i…

👍26🤔17❤7😱7🤡2💊1😈1

17 Sept 2026, 19:06 UTC≈4,810 views61 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Video

La supuesta raza de gigantes bajo el hielo 🔍 Una imagen de una isla del sur de Chile ha sido presentada por algunos usuarios como prueba de una supuesta raza de gigantes que viviría dentro del hielo glaciar. Sin embargo, Iain Cameron señala que la formación visible incluye una columna con un patrón simétrico. Su explicación provisional es técnica: la fotografía satelital podría haberse deformado al adaptarse a zona…

🤔41🤯7😁6❤4👍1💩1🤪1

16 Sept 2026, 19:13 UTC≈4,860 views58 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Video

Avistamiento atribuido en el desierto de Mojave Una publicación sitúa el supuesto incidente en las inmediaciones de Needles, California, durante el 11 de septiembre. Según el relato difundido, varios objetos habrían realizado patrones de vuelo descritos como imposibles y presentarían estructuras que algunos interpretan como tecnología no humana. El texto también afirma que el episodio habría ocurrido frente a obser…

👍38❤13🤯6🍌1

15 Sept 2026, 19:03 UTC≈4,740 views71 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Video

🐉 Caicai-Vilu: una figura bajo las aguas del sur de Chile Una grabación difundida desde los lagos del sur de Chile muestra algo que rompe la superficie y provoca una reacción de miedo en quien sostiene la cámara. La publicación rechaza que se trate simplemente de un animal extraño y lo relaciona con Caicai-Vilu, la serpiente primordial de la mitología mapuche. Según la interpretación difundida, la figura sería una …

🤔43👀16👍9❤2🙉1

14 Sept 2026, 18:47 UTC≈5,210 views57 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Video

🏛️ Moscú bajo tierra: el museo arqueológico de Okhotny Ryad Según la publicación, las excavaciones realizadas en la década de 1990 en la zona de Okhotny Ryad sacaron a la luz estructuras bajo la ciudad, en un espacio que posteriormente se convirtió en un centro comercial. Muy cerca se encuentra un museo arqueológico situado a unos 15 metros de profundidad. Algunos interpretan este caso como una muestra de que mucha…

😨33👍16❤5🤔2👻1

14 Sept 2026, 15:43 UTC≈4,560 views63 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Video

🌫️ La niña pálida y los jinetes de la bruma Una escena difundida en internet muestra, según la publicación, la figura de una niña pálida envuelta en una atmósfera nebulosa. Algunos interpretan la aparición como una anomalía de cámara; otros la relacionan con los llamados “jinetes de la bruma”, entidades del folclore oscuro asociadas al lamento fúnebre y a los límites entre el mundo de los vivos y el de los muertos. …

👍32🤔18🤯7❤3🤣2🙉1

Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @misterios_ocultos_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Misterios Ocultos” (@misterios_ocultos_channel), 31,030 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/misterios_ocultos_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.