2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,087–1,089 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Aug 2026, 12:21
1,088
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:28
1,088
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,700
Videos
≈2,130
Links
≈606
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
39 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
19
48.7%
❤
10
25.6%
😁
10
25.6%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2024 to 14 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
این پست را برای عزیزانتون به اشتراک بذارید
در هنگام تنش و بحران، مغز وارد "حالت بقا" میشه.
اضطراب، تپش قلب، قفل ذهن...
در این هنگام تنفس عمیق موجب فعالسازی عصب واگ
📉 کاهش ضربان
📉 افت کورتیزول
📈 بازیابی کنترل ذهن
میشه
تو نمیتونی جنگو متوقف کنی،
اما میتونی مغزتو از حالت جنگ دربیاری.
با فقط یک نفس عمیق.
🆔 @GizmizTel 💯
🎧 فرکانس ۹۶۳ هرتز؛ صدای ارتباط با آگاهی الهی 🕊️
فرکانس ۹۶۳Hz که به عنوان فرکانس خداگونه (God Frequency) یا فرکانس تاج چاکرا (Crown Chakra) شناخته میشه، یکی از قویترین ارتعاشات در موسیقیهای فرکانسیه که مستقیماً با بیداری معنوی، الهام شهودی و اتصال به انرژی کیهانی مرتبطه.
🔮 وقتی به این فرکانس گوش میدی:
– ذهنت از افکار منفی پاک میشه
– حس جدایی و انزوا از بین میره
– و به نوعی در سطحی بالاتر از آگاهی قرار میگیری …
#Repost @afsane_aghayi_pmu
خانم ۳۵ ساله ای که در پی مراجعه به آرایشگر برای انجام تتوابرو دچار همچین عارضه ای شده اند!
آخه چرا ؟😔
کلی دلیل داره داره که باعث شده این ابرو کلوئید بشه(گوشت اضافه)
🔱مثلا غیر بهداشتی کار کردن
🔱فشار دست زیاد
🔱خونریزی زیاد
🔱مراقبت اشتباه
🔱سوزن آلوده
🔱استفاده از دستمال کاغذی های غیراستاندارد برای پاک کردن مواد حین کار
و،،،،،،،
@afsane_aghayi_pmu
پیگمنتر عزیز با وجدان کار کن , پوست مشتری چ…
فیبروز هست که بهش تکنیک آپر اسپاین هم میگن،،
بعضی همکارا هم میگن که رو اسپاین آپر، استروک باید انجام بشه
و در نهایت با اختلاف کم میشه همون فیبروز یا میکروبلیدینگ😊
پس خیلی خودتو درگیر اسمو شکلو شمایل استروک ها نکن....چون مهم نیته که کار ظریف و تمیز دربیاد و تاامااام
اموزش و خدمات ۰۹۳۸۹۳۰۵۹۲۵
@afsaneh_aghayi
خط چشم
🥰🥰
آموزش و خدمات ۰۹۳۸۹۳۰۵۹۲۵
@afsaneh_aghayi
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @missaghayii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 335,572 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@missaghayii named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@afsaneh_aghayi named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@afsane_aghayi_pmu named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@afsanrh_aghayi named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حرفه ای شوید” (@missaghayii), 1,088 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/missaghayii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.