Йоу ребята что тут почему то сидят, при этом не находясь на новом канале, вы такой сок пропускаете Так там еще щас раздевашка проходит! https://t.me/miss_morgana https://t.me/miss_morgana
❤70🔥9💋1
![Telegram profile photo for Miss.Morgana[АРХИВ]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/8b/8b712275613857cfc7f09c62afcb0cd57ba1c00d66086e6d8882c0a41f080ce2.jpg)
Channel
@miss_morganaARCNIVE
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,700subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001777242883 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @miss_morganaARCNIVE |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miss_morganaARCNIVE |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 1,700 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 1,706 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 1,713 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 1,721 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 1,721 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 2 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2,194 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 958 | 43.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 570 | 26.0% | |
| 😭 | 186 | 8.48% | |
| 🔥 | 165 | 7.52% | |
| 🥰 | 113 | 5.15% | |
| 💘 | 44 | 2.01% | |
| 💋 | 41 | 1.87% | |
| 🍓 | 34 | 1.55% | |
| 😱 | 19 | 0.866% | |
| 🎉 | 16 | 0.729% | |
| 🕊 | 15 | 0.684% | |
| 😨 | 15 | 0.684% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 0.501% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 0.137% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 0.137% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.046% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,194reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2025 to 10 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @miss_morganaARCNIVE. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2025 to 10 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Йоу ребята что тут почему то сидят, при этом не находясь на новом канале, вы такой сок пропускаете Так там еще щас раздевашка проходит! https://t.me/miss_morgana https://t.me/miss_morgana
❤70🔥9💋1
Вот вы тут сидите, и даже не подозреваете что у меня в новом канале открылись ккм! https://t.me/miss_morgana
❤🔥66❤10🍓9🔥5💋2
А чего это мы тут все еще сидим??? В новом канале больше моих новых работ!!! https://t.me/miss_morgana
🥰95🔥16🕊11❤9🍓4👍2💋2❤🔥1
Channel name was changed to «Miss.Morgana[АРХИВ]»
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Вот и наступил этот день. Для меня он одновременно и долгожданный, и безумно страшный. Буду честна — я очень его боялась. Но будто бы и не вижу другого выхода? Я уже давно писала, что мой старый канал ощущается пустым, без души. Просто залитые арты — и всё. И да, я до сих пор вздыхаю по прошлому, когда он был более тёплым, живым. Тогда это было моё место, мой уголок, где я делилась мыслями, не гналась за ц…
❤93😭29😨15😱5🍓3🔥2❤🔥1💋1
кстати в скваде начался один ивент с Мафией, вот моя карточка ведущего, можете пойти посмотреть и почитать что за ивент такой 😳 #рисунок
❤🔥110❤19🔥16🎉3🍓1
обычно пока я в ресте все полноценки публикую только в щп, но тут я не могу не поделится этой женщиной☺️ Души меня Луиза де саль души…. 🤩 ФАЙЛ 🤩 #рисунок
❤142❤🔥48🔥26🕊4💋2🍓1
Залетаю в последний вагон🌟 Было просто интересно какие у меня работы и соберется ли у меня все на эту палитру, можно заметить тут много старых и новых работ, особенно по яркости пхпхп, раньше работы были тусклее, чуть не ебнулась пока искала нужные #the_color_wheel
❤95❤🔥26💘12💋3🍓1
хоп хоп, арт на Дтиус Кимроззз надеюсь подходит.... 🤩 Файл 🤩 #рисунок
❤🔥169❤46🔥28💋5💘4🍓1
🍃DTIYS🍃 итоги: 1 сентября давно хотела провести!🐾 🐈призы: 1 место: большой набор моего мерча на выбор и полноценный арт 2 место: набор мерча(10 позиций на выбор) ✨условия: подписаться на меня репостнуть пост 🌟нельзя менять: персонажа локацию сада/леса 🐾можно добавить других персонажей🐾 🌟запрещено: срисовка и обводка/обмазка dtiys - нарисуй это в своем стиле. вы рисуете арт в своем стиле, добавляя что-то от себ…
❤48🥰9❤🔥3🔥2🍓1💋1
недавно вернулась с отдыха, и решила сразу заспидранить детей Тарелочки, спасибо ей большое за то что она ухаживала за моим скай акаунтом 😳 #рисунок
❤155🔥39💘18🥰9🍓5❤🔥3💋1
Я бы заплакала даже но я жду автобус что бы наконец то приехать в свою страну после отдыха, и тут как бы людно пхпхпх
❤127💋20😭14💘2🍓1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @miss_morganaARCNIVE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@miss_morganaARCNIVE named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Miss.Morgana[АРХИВ]” (@miss_morganaARCNIVE), 1,700 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miss_morganaARCNIVE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.