Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MisJadoogar | آموزش عکاسی و ژست

Channel

MisJadoogar | آموزش عکاسی و ژست

@misjadoogar

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,365subscribers

+384 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001133183299
TypeChannel
Username@misjadoogar
Descriptionسلام دوستان عزیزم به کانال تلگرام من خوش اومدید ویدئوهارو اگر خوشتون اومد منتشر کنید لینک گروه: https://t.me/+S0zSsi8BZFlmMGVk ادرس پیج اینستاگرام https://www.instagram.com/Misjadoogar جهت تبلیغات به این آیدی پیام بدید👇 @misjadou
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/misjadoogar

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

16,98117,40917,19517,3656 August 202611 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 98 days, net +384. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,917–17,473 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 17:4717,365-8
10 Nov 2026, 00:4417,373-9
8 Nov 2026, 18:4817,382-3
7 Nov 2026, 14:0617,385-1
6 Nov 2026, 13:5017,386-9
5 Nov 2026, 12:0817,395-4
4 Nov 2026, 15:0017,399-10
3 Nov 2026, 15:2717,409+2
2 Nov 2026, 12:4017,407+97
1 Nov 2026, 11:3017,310-8
31 Oct 2026, 11:4517,318+10
30 Oct 2026, 14:3617,308+10
29 Oct 2026, 15:0617,298+4
28 Oct 2026, 13:2817,294-11
27 Oct 2026, 14:5817,305-4
26 Oct 2026, 17:3617,309-4
25 Oct 2026, 18:3817,313+5
24 Oct 2026, 17:5917,308-1
23 Oct 2026, 18:0017,309+4
22 Oct 2026, 14:3117,305first reading

Engagement

143 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.53%
avg views ÷ 17,365 subscribers
Avg views / post
960
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 143 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held143 (27 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total48,023
Reactions total665
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 05:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,850
Videos
≈725
Links
≈180

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
31m 32s
Average length
2m 06s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,938 reactions across 135 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,30167.1%
👍29615.3%
🤣1608.26%
😍894.59%
🔥331.70%
😱311.60%
💔90.464%
👌80.413%
👏80.413%
😁20.103%
🆒10.052%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 140 of the 143 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,025 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 143 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 50 posts held from the last 30 days (24.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 16:16 UTC328 views6 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

تولد یعنی ... بار دیگر خدا فرصت تکرار لحظه ها را به ما می‌دهد✨ 🌱 سن تولدتون رو تو متن پرامپت تغییر بدید. متن پرامپت در قسمت نظرات تقدیم به شما 🌻 #تولد @misjadoogar

❤5🤣1

Signed 𝑨𝒍𝒊 𝑴𝒐𝒉𝒂𝒎𝒎𝒂𝒅𝒊

12 Nov 2026, 09:27 UTC504 views5 reactionsread 13 November 2026

اینو میذارم ترایال پیج😂😂😂

🤣4😱1

12 Nov 2026, 08:37 UTC528 views24 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

پست موقت مزاحمت 😐😂 @misjadoogar

🤣21❤2😱1

Signed ᴍᵒˢᵗᵃᶠᵃ

12 Nov 2026, 07:09 UTC570 views9 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

۳۰۰ تا رز هم کمه وقتی قراره سورپرایز بشی 🌹😍 یه قاب لاکچری و رمانتیک با یه دسته‌گل صورتی بزرگ و لبخندی که همه‌چیز رو قشنگ‌تر می‌کنه. 💗 پرامپت کامل رو توی کامنت‌ها گذاشتم. ✨ #گل @misjadoogar

❤7😍2

Signed Misjadoogar

11 Nov 2026, 15:01 UTC649 views21 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

پست موقت سم بدنتون نیوفته یکم سم خالص ببینیم ساخته شده با هوش مصنوعی رایگان کمی بخند 😂😂😂 خلاصه میتونید با حوصله خیلی چیزای خفن و شیک درست نه اینجوری 😂

🤣19😍2

Signed ᴍᵒˢᵗᵃᶠᵃ

11 Nov 2026, 08:37 UTC729 views14 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#درخواستی « Paris ne se visite pas seulement, elle se ressent. » 🇫🇷 پاریس را فقط نمی‌بینی، بلکه آن را با تمام وجودت احساس می‌کنی. ☕✨ پرامپت در قسمت نظرات @misjadoogar

❤12😍2

Signed ᴍᵒˢᵗᵃᶠᵃ

10 Nov 2026, 17:59 UTC753 views6 reactionsread 13 November 2026

زیر این پستمون چقدر کامنتی گذاشتین 😍👏

❤6

10 Nov 2026, 17:15 UTC753 views9 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

به وقت #گاسیپ 😄 این آقای هوانگ هم بدجو‌ر تو هچل افتادااااا هوس یکی از بدترین باگ‌های انسانه! تو هر جایگاهی از ثروت و قدرت باشی ممکنه به فنا بری. اون از جف بزوس که سیاه بخت شد اینم از داداشمون هوانگ! @misjadoogar

🤣7❤2

10 Nov 2026, 16:28 UTC685 views13 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

خودتونو تبدیل به یه اثر هنری #مجسمه_سنگی با جزئیات تبدیل کنید متن پرامپت در قسمت نظرات تقدیم به شما 🌻 @misjadoogar

❤9👍4

Signed 𝑨𝒍𝒊 𝑴𝒐𝒉𝒂𝒎𝒎𝒂𝒅𝒊

10 Nov 2026, 11:38 UTC703 views12 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

همیشه بعد از ساخت عکس با هوش مصنوعی متوجه میشیم متوجه میشن که این عکس با هوش مصنوعی درست شده و روی عصابه با این پرامپت خیلی راحت میتونید عکسای هوش مصنوعی خودتونو تا ۹۹% به عکس واقعی تبدیل کنید و بیننده رو به چالش بکشید متن پرامپت در قسمت نظرات @misjadoogar

❤12

Signed ᴍᵒˢᵗᵃᶠᵃ

10 Nov 2026, 10:34 UTC751 views15 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

گاهی فقط یه عینک ظریف و نور طلایی پاییز کافیه تا یه عکس فوق‌العاده خاص داشته باشی! 🍁🤎 این پرامپت رو امتحان کن و نتیجه متفاوتش رو ببین. پرامپت کامل توی کامنت‌هاست. ✨ @misjadoogar

😍9❤6

Signed Misjadoogar

10 Nov 2026, 06:24 UTC791 views15 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🍂 یه عکس پاییزی با حال‌وهوای سینمایی و طبیعی، بدون تغییر چهره و جزئیات صورتت! 🤎 با این پرامپت می‌تونی یه پرتره خاص و جذاب از خودت بسازی. 📸 پرامپت کامل رو توی کامنت‌ها براتون گذاشتم. ✨ @misjadoogar

😍10❤5

Signed Misjadoogar

Showing the 12 most recent of 143 posts we hold for @misjadoogar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@misjadoogar edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTCAnonymous Poll85 voters

کدوم پرامپت رو بذارم؟!

  1. پرامپت شماره ۱14%
  2. پرامپت شماره ۲87%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTCAnonymous Poll169 voters

وضعیت اینترنتتون چطوره؟

  1. ⚡️خوبه21%
  2. ضعیفه☹️79%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 143 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

فیلترشکن/تکنولوژی/عالیوس
@aliyosgraphy · 206,659
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 11 August 2026
Mtproto
@mtproto70 · 24,850
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MisJadoogar | آموزش عکاسی و ژست” (@misjadoogar), 17,365 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/misjadoogar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.