Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for mishas tips

Channel

mishas tips

@mishastips

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,031subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001400045311
TypeChannel
Username@mishastips
Created7 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mishastips

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,0225,0505,0366 August 2026 — 5,049 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,050 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,049 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,046 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,047 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,044 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,043 subscribers3 September 2026 — 5,027 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,022 subscribers16 September 2026 — 5,026 subscribers25 September 2026 — 5,031 subscribers5,0316 August 202625 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 49 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,018–5,054 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 02:165,031+5
16 Sept 2026, 19:175,026+4
9 Sept 2026, 06:185,022-5
3 Sept 2026, 14:575,027-16
28 Aug 2026, 03:035,043-1
24 Aug 2026, 18:275,044-3
17 Aug 2026, 16:255,047+1
14 Aug 2026, 00:445,046-3
10 Aug 2026, 10:355,049-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:505,050+1
6 Aug 2026, 21:165,049first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 3 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
57s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

665 reactions across 17 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤23935.9%
🔥13920.9%
👍6910.4%
👎477.07%
🥱477.07%
😁334.96%
🤯121.80%
🤔91.35%
🙈81.20%
🥴81.20%
🕊71.05%
💯60.902%
❤‍🔥50.752%
👀50.752%
💊50.752%
🙏50.752%
🤣30.451%
🐳20.301%
🗿20.301%
😍20.301%
9 further kinds121.80%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 665 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 December 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 17 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mishastips. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 December 2025 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
5.88%
1 of 17 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,650
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,260
over 16 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGrb4uF120 July 202620 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 December 2025 to 5 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC≈1,070 views91 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Первый чарт в России без ИИ треков Сервис «КИОН Музыка» первым в России запустил новый чарт без треков, полностью сгенерированных искусственным интеллектом. Раздел получил название «Настоящий Чарт». Техническая проверка каталога реализована с помощью детектора Slopless – расширения для браузера, анализирующего треки на предмет ИИ-генераций. Распознавание проводится с точностью в 83%. При возникновении спорных ситуа…

❤36👍33🔥15❤‍🔥4👎1🥱1🦄1

20 Jul 2026, 16:05 UTC≈1,650 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFGrb4uFPhoto

Если интересно узнать, как музыка попадает в кино и сериалы, 22 июля в Москве будет хороший повод в этом разобраться. Приложение для артистов Звук Студио проведёт новый Студийник. Тема ивента – синхронизация: как треки попадают в кино и сериалы. Можно послушать музыкальных продюсеров из Okko, KION, Яндекс Музыки и Sync Lab, а также менеджеров артистов «Комната культуры», Green Apelsin. Будут обсуждать, как устроен …

❤17👎4

15 Jun 2026, 14:00 UTC≈2,660 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Как попадать в рекомендации VK Музыки Стриминг рассказал на что опираются алгоритмы при продвижении музыки в рекомендательном потоке VK Mix Из интересного: • за 14 дней до релиза алгоритмы смотрят на активность на карточке артиста в VK Музыка. Как стратегия - просите ваших слушателей подписываться на карточку артиста. Слушатели, кто подписан на вашу карточку артиста получат пуш-уведомление о новых релизах. • запуск…

❤26💊5😁2🤬1

2 Jun 2026, 14:54 UTC≈3,040 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Juno Download спустя 20 лет - всё Лично не пользовался им, но это был один из популярных магазинов для электронной музыки. DJ Mag цитирует операционного директора Juno Лукаса Гарсиа: «Конечно, это печальный день, но поскольку стриминг стал доминирующей моделью потребления цифровой музыки, артисты и лейблы теперь как никогда связаны со своими поклонниками через социальные сети и сервисы «прямого взаимодействия с фа…

🕊7❤2🙏2

2 Jun 2026, 14:43 UTC≈2,120 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Новый бейдж для страниц артистов в Spotify Verified by Spotify — этот бейдж показывает, что профиль артиста прошёл проверку и соответствует критериям подлинности и доверия, которые задаёт сама платформа. Задача этой метки — дать слушателям быстрый и понятный сигнал: перед ними артист с реальной, устойчивой активностью на Spotify, а не случайный или сомнительный профиль. В условиях, когда на платформе миллионы проф…

❤9👀4

1 Jun 2026, 08:14 UTC≈2,110 views34 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Аналитика: рынок стриминга в России и мире в 2025 Стали доступны отчёты: IFPI, которые ежегодно считают объём мирового рынка, но после 2022 года перестали учитывать Россию Национальной федерации музыкальной индустрии (НФМИ) — раз IFPI перестали считать Россию, то кто-то должен был это сделать 🙂 Ниже — цифры из этих двух отчётов по аудиостримингу. Выручка: Мировой стриминг — $22 млрд. Рост 7,7% по сравнению с 20…

❤28👎3🐳2🍓1

14 May 2026, 11:19 UTC≈2,610 views98 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Кайфовое обновление интерфейса у Моей Волны в Яндекс Музыке ❤️

🔥37👎35❤16🙈7🗿2👀1

4 May 2026, 13:22 UTC≈3,410 views22 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Что может быть лучше статистических данных? Только большее количество срезов этих данных. Недавно BandLink запустил AI-ассистента. Что он может? Собирает и показывает инсайты по вашим релизам и даёт советы, что нужно сделать, чтобы улучшить показатели. В моём случае рекомендации сводились к тому, чтобы чаще делиться пресейв-ссылкой и вовлекать аудиторию с помощью призывов к действию. В целом это хорошая штука-напо…

👍11🔥4❤3🤗2😍2

11 Mar 2026, 06:43 UTC≈3,120 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @mudinewsVideo

Недавно побывал в Томске в гостях у Дмитрия Пангаева основателя сервиса YOGA и Бубука. Поговорили конечно же про про ИИ музыку, дистрибуцию, новый личный кабинет YOGA и развитие сервиса в ближнем зарубежье, где уже публичное исполнение музыки становится отдельным каналом продвижения 🤔 Смотреть интервью: 📱 YouTube Rutube 📱 VK Видео 📱 Дзен

❤12👍6🥴2⚡1

13 Jan 2026, 12:28 UTC≈4,290 views65 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня в Томске, снимали подкаст с Димой Пангаевым основателем сервисов Yoga и Bubuka. Хочется вам побыстрее показать 😊

🔥41❤10👍8🥴3👎2🙏1

22 Dec 2025, 17:55 UTC≈5,160 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Мой бро Антон Хес запускает бесплатный инкубатор для электронных артистов, тут можно почитать инфо и я не мог не порекомендовать этот запуск. Мне кажется это первый канал, с которым я делюсь тут. С Антоном мы очень давно знакомы и в свое время лет 8 назад запускали обучающие программы для электронной сцены и в целом работали в одной сфере - менеджменте электронных артистов. У Антона богатый международный опыт (наве…

🔥12❤4

16 Dec 2025, 17:15 UTC≈4,620 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026

BandLink запускают музыкальный индекс В него входят 1000 артистов, к которым Россия проявляет интерес Учитываются - прослушивания на стримингах - просмотр материалов об артистах в СМИ - и другие показатели Очень крутая штука как по мне

❤39🤔9🔥6🥴2🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @mishastips. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

BandLink. СаундЧек
@BandLink · 24,073
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 September 2026
ИМИ
@imi_live · 25,594
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026
Звук | Музыкальный сервис
@zvuk_sound · 37,093
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
Родной звук
@rodzvuk · 38,187
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
КИОН Музыка
@kionmusic_on · 27,707
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“mishas tips” (@mishastips), 5,031 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mishastips.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.