Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MisF

Channel

MisF

@misfiststt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

330subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003988673182
TypeChannel
Username@misfiststt
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 22 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/misfiststt

Growth

327330328.58 Aug 2026, 15:31 — 327 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 01:51 — 330 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:319 Aug 2026, 01:51
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 327–330 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 01:51330+3
8 Aug 2026, 15:31327first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
116.8%
avg views ÷ 330 subscribers
Avg views / post
385
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total7,706
Reactions total1,123
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,123 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24321.6%
custom 527201634517150940616314.5%
💘13812.3%
custom 531250648363461594212811.4%
❤‍🔥938.28%
custom 5399945081409009261847.48%
custom 5280599399225897621797.03%
custom 5280682352224276492716.32%
😎443.92%
🥰353.12%
🍓262.32%
💔100.89%
custom 527414220795414060390.801%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,123reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
40
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 20 we hold a reading for · 75%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @misfiststt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC123 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

.

24custom 53125064836346159427custom 52806823522242764926custom 52720163451715094062

6 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC226 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @drxkeerPhoto

посмотрите какой у меня Руслан репортер от миСф, если шо она рисует коммишки щас🥺🥺 можете у нее заказать коммишку, если хочется, она очень добрая, уступчивая, милая и сделает прям так как хочется

custom 531250648363461594217💘7

5 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC286 views89 reactions9 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ААА я успела, пососали?

63custom 528068235222427649214custom 531250648363461594211custom 53999450814090092611

4 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC300 views75 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

ЭмАгоп

😎44custom 53999450814090092611610custom 52720163451715094063💘1custom 53125064836346159421

3 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC305 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я чет не хочу сегодня рисовать. Переживете?

17custom 52741422079541406034

2 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC374 views92 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

.

❤‍🔥51custom 539994508140900926119custom 531250648363461594218💘4

1 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC413 views64 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Суки я в шлеме Пользуясь случаем еще раз дякую🤗

custom 527201634517150940638custom 528068235222427649214custom 53125064836346159427💘4custom 52741422079541406031

1 Aug 2026, 19:07 UTC365 views18 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Спасибо за 300 подписчиков❤️❤️❤️ Мне очень приятно😊 Сосать не буду

custom 527201634517150940613custom 52741422079541406033custom 53999450814090092612

1 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC408 views67 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Больше не возьму эту кисточку🖕

custom 527201634517150940643custom 528059939922589762117custom 528068235222427649251💘1

31 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC443 views83 reactions8 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Фуу, курит, ну я такое осуждаю

57💘20custom 52805993992258976216

30 Jul 2026, 20:17 UTC425 views80 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я поменяла кешу на просто Даню.

52💘20custom 52806823522242764928

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @misfiststt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,104,424 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MisF” (@misfiststt), 330 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/misfiststt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.