Channel
@mirvyzaniy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,787subscribers
-145 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001780621716 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mirvyzaniy |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mirvyzaniy |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 1,787 | -4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 1,791 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:25 | 1,794 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 1,797 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 1,798 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 1,801 | -106 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 1,907 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 1,914 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 1,916 | -14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 1,930 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 1,932 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 1,932 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
219 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 78 | 35.6% | |
| ❤ | 71 | 32.4% | |
| 👍 | 70 | 32.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Многие меня спрашивают, зачем мне столько сумок? 🤣 Ну вот нравится мне их вязать🤗, причем всегда охота придумать что-то новое, необычное. Ведь творить, значит создавать, то, что нравится, а не то, что надо😉. Очередная сумка 👆, осталось собрать 🤪. Пошла трудиться🤗
👍3🔥1
10-ый день стебли крапива лежит в воде, воду меняю все так же каждый день. Запаха уже нет🤗. Смотрите, как изменились стебли, стали мягкими, гибкими и шелковистыми. Но среди них есть и твердые стебли, это стебли цветущей крапивы. Читала, что надо стебли до цветения собирать, но ради эксперимента собрала и до, и после цветения.
❤4
Что бы вы связали из хлопковой пряжи букле?
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Смотрите 👆, как интересно получается ажур из буклированный пряжи. Такой нежный, как будто морозный узор на окне зимними днями, да ещё и мелкие пайетки добавляют искорки. И это пряжа 🧶арт.Kir (G& G Filati, Италия) Состав: 80% хлопок, 20% нейлон, пайетки. 460 м в 100 гр. Пряжа, сочетающая в себе нейлон и хлопок, объединяет в себе лучшие качества обеих составляющих. Она становится все более популярной среди рукоде…
🔥2
Помните наверно, провожу эксперимент с крапивой, пытаюсь сделать пряжу🙈. И вот, мой процесс далее👆. Замочила стебли в воде и меняю воду каждый день. Важно, чтобы вода покрывала все стебли и ничего не торчало. Воняет конечно😆, но это было ожидаемо. Поливаю этой водой цветы, хорошее удобрение😊
🔥4
Все просто, главное внимательность и терпение😇
❤26👍24🔥23
Идеи возникают так быстро, что не успеваешь их реализовывать. Не закончено ещё одно изделие, а в голове уже несколько новых🤗. У вас так же? Давно уже думала над этим проектом и вот уже мечта реализовываться: новое изделие из рафии Ispie. Необычный узор, нравится мне как получается🤗. Рафию Ispie по очень выгодной цене можно приобрести здесь: https://vk.ru/pyagula И да, как вяжу такой узор👇
🔥37❤19
Вы знали, что можно дома спрясть пряжу из крапивы? Недавно прочитала про такой способ и решила попробовать 🙈. Не знаю, что получится из этой затеи, самой очень интересно😀 Пожелайте мне удачи🤗. Итак, надев перчатки, сегодня собрала крапиву и оторвала все листочки, оставила только стебли. Положила в тень чтобы подсохло.
👍41❤17
Довязала, наконец - то сумочку из вощеного шнура😃. Два раза перевязывала и затянулся процесс, но это не важно, главное, результат есть и я им довольна🤗. Удобная и вместительная получилась сумочка, внутри подклад из ткани с кармашками. Теперь активно проверяю вощеный шнур в эксплуатации 😉, обязательно поделюсь.
🔥8
Как помните наверное, каждую неделю мы собираемся с любителями повязать и вяжем вместе, общаемся. Это наш клуб "Клубочек", созданный Ириной Заряновой. А на этой неделе решили повязать в парке на скамеечках. И это была отличная идея! Оказывается, очень многие вяжут и многим это очень интересно. Подходили многие, пришли даже специально повязать. Мы общались, делились опытом, своими идеями. Когда у людей есть общие…
❤5
Video, posted without a caption
👍2
Смотрите, что ещё нашла: шикарные сумки из рафии, лёгкие, удобные и комфортные. Знаете сколько стоят? Можно приблизить фото и посмотреть цену. Но можно и связать самим😉. Видео, где показано как вязать такой узор👇
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @mirvyzaniy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что бы вы связали из хлопковой пряжи букле?
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Свяжи свой мир” (@mirvyzaniy), 1,787 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mirvyzaniy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.