Channel
@mirpolat_tv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
425subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001445703796 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mirpolat_tv |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mirpolat_tv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 425 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 427 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 426 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 426 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 5 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
204 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 95 | 46.6% | |
| 👍 | 91 | 44.6% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 5.88% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 1.96% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.49% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.49% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 204reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2024 to 29 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📌 Instagramda videoni TOPga chiqarishga yordam beradigan bir muhim narsani sizlar bilan bo‘lishmoqchiman. Men buni test qilib ko‘rdim 👇 Video joylaganingizdan keyin, birinchi 20–30 ta kommentga albatta javob yozing. Qolgan kommentlarga javob berish shart emas. 💡 Nima bo‘ladi? Instagram algoritmi videoda aktivlik bor deb o‘ylaydi va uni ko‘proq odamga ko‘rsatishni boshlaydi. ⏳ Muhimi: Video birinchi kuni “portlama…
🔥4👍2
Bu hayot poygasida yutishning iloji yo‘q. Buni qabul qilish qiyin, lekin haqiqat shu. Har doim sendan yaxshiroq kimdir bo‘ladi: kimdadir mashina yangiroq, kimdadir kiyim qimmatroq, kimdadir uyi hashamatliroq, kimdadir hayoti senga qaraganda “ideal” ko‘rinadi. Sen esa yugurishda davom etasan. Yana ko‘proq ishlaysan. Yana ko‘proq topishga harakat qilasan. Yana boshqalarga yetishga urinasan. Lekin bir narsani sezmay…
🔥8👍5👏3🤔1
🤑 Pul topishdagi eng katta xato Hamma qiladigan, lekin tan olmaydigan xato Pul topish uchun hamma ko‘proq ishlashga urinadi. Lekin muammo bu yerda emas. Asl xato — hamma ishni o‘zing qilishga urinish. Vaqtni sotib pul topishning chegarasi bor. 24 soat — hamma uchun bir xil. Pul esa tizim, fikrlash va to‘g‘ri qarorlar orqali keladi. Kimdir ishlaydi, kimdir esa ishlaydigan tizim quradi. Shu sabab kimdir charchaydi…
👍4🔥3👏2
Do‘stlar nega kamayib boradi? Bir paytlar har kuni gaplashgan, tez-tez ko‘rishgan odamlar vaqt o‘tib… sekin yo‘qola boshlaydi. 👉 Bu yomon belgimi? Yo‘q. Bu — normal holat. Hayot o‘zgargani sari maqsadlar, mas’uliyat va ustuvorliklar ham o‘zgaradi. Kimdir o‘sishda davom etadi, kimdir esa o‘sha joyda qoladi. Do‘stlar kamayishi — yolg‘izlik emas. Bu filtrlanish. Yonimizda kamroq odam qoladi, lekin haqiqiylari qolad…
🔥6👍4👏4
Quyida lid narxi arzon bo‘lishi uchun qilinishi shart bo‘lgan asosiy ishlar 👇 1️⃣Reklama EMAS, taklif (offer) sotadi Agar: - taklif noaniq bo‘lsa - foyda aniq aytilmagan bo‘lsa - raqobatchilardan farqi yo‘q bo‘lsa 👉 eng zo‘r nastroyka ham lidni arzon qilmaydi. 2️⃣ Kreativlar (video/post) hal qiluvchi rol o‘ynaydi Targetolog reklama qo‘yadi, lekin odam bosadi yoki bosmaydi — kreativ hal qiladi. Arzon lid bo‘lishi…
👍10🔥3👏2🎉1
Assalomu alaykum Uzoq muddatli tanaffusdan so‘ng bir foydali post yozgim keldi. 📱 Instagramdagi ko‘plab targetologlar reklama orqali kelgan arzon lidlarni ko‘rsatib maqtanishadi. Lekin siz reklama yoqsangiz — lid narxi ancha qimmat chiqadi. Shunda tabiiy savol tug‘iladi: “Demak, muammo nastroykadami?” Qisman — ha. Lekin lid narxini arzonlashtiradigan asosiy omillar ko‘pincha umuman boshqa joyda bo‘ladi.
👍7🔥4🎉3👏1
🤖 Sun'iy intellekt ham adashishi mumkin! 🤖❌ Ko‘pchilik o‘ylaydi: “Sun'iy intellekt xato qilmaydi!” Lekin aslida, sun'iy intellekt ham odamlar kabi ba'zida adashishi mumkin. Nega deganda: 🧠 ChatGPT kabi modellar insonlar yozgan ma'lumotlar asosida o‘rgatilgan. 👥 Inson ma'lumotlarida esa xatoliklar va noto‘g‘ri tushunchalar bo‘lishi tabiiy. 🔄 Ba'zan esa savolni noaniq tushunish yoki javobni tezroq berishga shoshilish…
👍7👎1
🤖 Sun’iy intellekt imkoniyatlari cheksiz. Eng muhimi – undan qanday foydalanishni bilish! 📌 Men nima qildim? 1️⃣ Kontent reja – AI’dan so‘radim, u menga to‘liq rejani yozib berdi. 2️⃣ Video senariysi – Sun’iy intellektdan skript yozishini so‘radim, yozib berdi. 3️⃣ Tayyor ssenariy asosida video tayyorladim. Natija esa kutilganidan ham a’lo bo‘ldi! 📈 Video TOPga chiqdi: 👀 530 000+ ko‘rishlar ❤️ 28 000+ layklar ✈️ 23…
👍10🔥3
🏹 Hozir sizga chatgpt qilgan ishini ko'rsataman!
👍5
Kontenet plan va senariy yozishda chatgpt dan foydalanasizmi?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😎O'zimda bo'lgan tajriba bilan bo'lishmoqchiman! Ko‘pchilik faqat 😎Instagram’ga e’tibor qaratadi. Videolaringizni tayyorlaysiz, sifatli content qilasiz, lekin prasmotr kam... Bu tabiiy holat! Instagram’da raqobat juda kuchli. Shu sababli, men bir mijozim uchun tayyorlagan videolarni 😎 YouTube Shorts’ga ham joylab ko‘rdim. Natija esa hayratlanarli! Video topga chiqdi va atigi 7 kun ichida: ✅ 1800+ ta yangi obunachi …
👍8🔥5
❌ 2025 YILDAN BOSHLAB INSTAGRAMDA TAQIQLANADIGAN SO‘ZLAR RO'YXATI ❌ ⭐️ Kontentingizga yoki Instagram profilingizga cheklovlarga tushib qolmasligi uchun, 2025 yilda boshlab ushbu so‘zlarni ishlatmaslikka xarakat qiling. Mana eng xavfli so‘zlar ro‘yxati: 💸 Moliyaviy atamalar: Pul, daromad, foyda, Moliyaviy erkinlik, Kursimni sotib olsang boyib ketasan. ✋ Harakatga undovchi so'zlar: Obuna bo‘ling, Layk bosing, Izoh q…
👍11
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mirpolat_tv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Kontenet plan va senariy yozishda chatgpt dan foydalanasizmi?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2024 to 29 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 411,091 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mirpo'lat TV” (@mirpolat_tv), 425 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mirpolat_tv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.