You have many reasons to come to our first meeting, see at the picture ! (P.S. imagine, it's also free!!!)
❤4
Signed Милана

Channel
@mipt_meetup
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
804subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001441515548 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mipt_meetup |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mipt_meetup |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 804 | -19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 823 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 826 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 826 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 30 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (30 January 2023 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 359 |
| Reactions total | 23 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
86 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 34 | 39.5% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 22.1% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 15.1% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 6.98% | |
| 🗿 | 5 | 5.81% | |
| 🌭 | 4 | 4.65% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.16% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 1.16% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.16% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.16% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.16% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2023 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
You have many reasons to come to our first meeting, see at the picture ! (P.S. imagine, it's also free!!!)
❤4
Signed Милана
«Откуда это в моих подписках?…» Вы обязательно вспомните! Спустя несколько лет мы возвращаем наш бесплатный разговорный клуб английского. С новым составом, силами и идеями. Кто был подписан - оставайтесь, кто видит нас впервые - присоединяйтесь! Наш клуб не просто про практику языка, а про комьюнити единомышленников и вечно молодых душой 🫶🏼 Поэтому следите за обновлениями, чтобы успеть присоединиться к первому уро…
🔥14😁5
Signed Милана
10 000 шагов общения Привет! Я участник mipt_meetup Юра Маркелов. У меня новый проект. Я каждое утро хожу пешком на учёбу примерно от Кутузовской до Фрунзенской по набережной. Это занимает километров шесть и час с копейками. Совмещаю эту прогулку с общением. У меня есть 100+ часов опыта в педагогике, организации мероприятий до 50 человек @tusimtrezvo и @fili5verst, математике, благотворительности, построении систе…
❤5👍2
Signed Денис Евтеев
🎉 International New Year's Party 2024-25! 🎉 by The International Students of MIPT ✨ This is the place to celebrate New Year's Eve in style! Start your evening by soaking in the magical classic New Year's decor and the breathtaking views of Red Square. 🏰🎇 💃 Stroll through the romantic streets of Arbat, enjoying the festive vibes with your loved ones. Then, head over to our party right at the centre of📍Arbat Street …
🔥8❤4🎉1🥰1😱1
Signed Aditya
🥷 Get ready to kick off the ultimate showdown in the world of football fandom and love dynamics! 🚀 🌟 Join us for the 2nd English Debate Club event of the semester where we'll be diving into the heated debate: "Messi vs Ronaldo: Who is the better footballer?" ⚽️ But that's not all! 🤔 We'll also be delving into the intricate realms of relationships with the topic: "Looking at love from a 'third' perspective, monogamy…
👍2❤1💅1
Signed Aditya
If I host, would you come to the meetup in ZOOM tommorow (08.10) at 16:00 (MSK) ❔
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed Vladimir Networker R15
👋 ZOOM 👋
👍1
Signed Vladimir R15
Are you coming today at 20:30 (MSK) ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🗿5
Signed Vladimir R15
Hello again! 📔 Announcement of meeting Tomorrow 30.07 at 20:30 (MSK) in Zoom 👉 Join the chat for more details! Our meetings is a place where you can: 🎈 practice your English & communication skills 🎈 make impactful connections with people from different universities and culture Hope to see you!!!
❤1👍1
Signed Vladimir R15
If I host, would you come to the meetup in ZOOM next Sunday (30.07) at 20:00?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🌭4
Signed Vladimir R15
Is anybody here? 🙋♀️🙋♂️ Hello, it's Vova @piofant, host of @mipt_meetup I have an idea to make our typical meetup this Sunday (30.07) at 20:00 (MSK), with a duration of ~2 hours, like we did in 2022. Just a brief reminder of how our meetups usually go: - The host starts by asking new attendees about their place of study or any other question to start the discussion - Within 5-10 minutes, attendees join the meeti…
👍6❤4🔥2
Signed Vladimir R15
🫥Unfortunately, Good things have to come to an end. 🫂With that being said, физтех-buddy invites you to our fifth and final debate event to discuss controversial topics! ⏰20:00, Friday 14th of April 🫖Snacks and tea 📍Conference hall, 2nd Floor, KSP ❗️Participants have to fill form. ✏️You have one more Friday to look forward to! As the legend Rebecca Black said, 'Gotta go debate on Friday'... or something like that? E…
🔥5👍1🤯1😁1
Signed Aditya
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @mipt_meetup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
If I host, would you come to the meetup in ZOOM tommorow (08.10) at 16:00 (MSK) ❔
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Are you coming today at 20:30 (MSK) ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
If I host, would you come to the meetup in ZOOM next Sunday (30.07) at 20:00?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2023 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,303,122 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“mipt_meetup” (@mipt_meetup), 804 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mipt_meetup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.