4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,051–3,053 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 07:05
3,053
+2
10 Aug 2026, 04:18
3,051
-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:52
3,052
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:18
3,052
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
55.4%
avg views ÷ 3,053 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,690
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.059%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held
7 (8 June 2026 – 22 July 2026)
Views total
1,690
Reactions total
1
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
20s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
4
36.4%
🔥
4
36.4%
❤
2
18.2%
🥴
1
9.09%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Рады анонсировать очередное масштабное мероприятие по ботулинотерапии. Форум «Эстетика совершенства на Неве» пройдет в г. Санкт-Петербурге 7 октября!
Остаемся верны традиции. Поэтому почти полностью сохранили название нашей конференции, которая состоялась этой весной в Москве на Новом Арбате. Сохранили и «звездный» состав спикеров, и выдающуюся научную программу. Кроме того, «Эстетика совершенства на Неве» это …
Уважаемые коллеги! По вашим многочисленным просьбам мы решили провести базовый онлайн-семинар по работе с препаратом МИОТОКС®. В нем Наталья Филиппова (Директор по развитию бренда в РФ) традиционно затронет все основные вопросы, которые задают врачи, начинающие работать препаратом. А также ответит на наиболее популярные вопросы от уже опытных пользователей МИОТОКС®. Что «подсветим»? Рынок современных ботулинических …
Готовим новые мастер-классы для врачей с медицинскими советниками МИОТОКС®. Не будем раскрывать интригу полностью, но можем сказать определённо: каждый новый сезон получается интереснее предыдущего! Отсняли материал для очередного практикума профессора, д.м.н. Шаровой Алисы Александровны, в котором мы рассматриваем взаимосвязь мимического профиля пациента с конкретными повторяющимися эмоциями и предлагаем действенные…
17–18 сентября 2026 г.
Миотокс — партнер научно-практической конференции «Дальневосточная осень. Безопасная эстетическая медицина».
Мы рады поздравить Юцковскую Яну Александровну и Юцковского Александра Дмитриевича с 35-летним юбилеем Профессорской клиники Юцковских и пригласить Вас присоединиться к одному из ключевых отраслевых событий этой осени.
Конференция объединит врачей-косметологов, дерматовенерологов, гин…
‼️Что важно знать о семинаре Натальи Юрьевны Бычковой 27 июня в Москве:
1. Это семинар не столько о ботулотоксине, сколько о врачебном мышлении. О том, как «читать лицо», видеть не отдельную морщину, а поведенческий моторный профиль. Как понять, какая мимика уже формирует будущие возрастные изменения? Как с помощью управляемой миорелаксации менять мимический паттерн — последовательно и клинически обоснованно на при…
27 июня в Москве готовимся провести интересный семинар и мастер-класс по материалам форума «Эстетика совершенства 2026». Случай уникальный, поскольку в этот раз спикер форума и медицинский советник МИОТОКС® Бычкова Наталья Юрьевна не просто даст представленный в рамках форума материал в расширенном формате, а продолжит начатый на «Эстетике совершенства» разговор о персонифицированной ботулинотерапии в развитии.
Под…
🔥А вот кадры с мастер-класса для врачей в московской клинике «Реформа». Обучение медицинского персонала топовых клиник, работающих препаратом МИОТОКС®, — важная часть нашей стратегии развития. Особенно ценно, когда преподавателями на этих мастер-классах выступают звездные спикеры команды МИОТОКС®. В этот раз перед врачами выступила Забненкова Ольга Владимировна. И да, серьезный акцент был сделан на заявленной во вре…
🔥1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @miotoxmethod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 164,576 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МЕТОД МИОТОКС®” (@miotoxmethod), 3,053 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miotoxmethod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.