Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for mint tea

Channel

mint tea

@mintteeaa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,482subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001752872918
TypeChannel
Username@mintteeaa
Created16 October 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mintteeaa

Growth

6,4716,4866,478.56 August 2026 — 6,472 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,472 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,471 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,485 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,486 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,482 subscribers6,4826 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,469–6,488 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 14:046,482-4
12 Aug 2026, 14:546,486+1
9 Aug 2026, 20:526,485+14
7 Aug 2026, 02:496,471-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:306,472no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:596,472first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.6%
avg views ÷ 6,482 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
22.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held8 (30 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total10,183
Reactions total2,270
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,270 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
89739.5%
custom 530096283560867473929513.0%
🍓28212.4%
custom 547458669527594252123710.4%
custom 54044755546467394261928.46%
💋1767.75%
💘1516.65%
🕊401.76%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,270reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC843 views256 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

learning chinese for this cute moments!!🤩 моей попутчицей на ласточке до выборга была милая китаянка, с которой мы немножко поболтали, и она подарила мне открытку, которую подписала от руки, ну что за прелесть!! как после этого не сделать 100509 домашних заданий 🤩

custom 540447555464673942611790💋32💘17

9 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC≈1,050 views322 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

just another day 🤩🪷🤩🗓️🤩

🍓14299custom 540447555464673942675💋6

7 Aug 2026, 06:53 UTC≈1,180 views264 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

spongebob's breakfast 🍍 have a good day y'all!!

140🍓58custom 530096283560867473949💋17

5 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC≈1,480 views295 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

daily reminder🤩

149💋74💘45custom 530096283560867473925🍓2

4 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC≈1,620 views249 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

этого будет более чем достаточно, чтобы посидеть и подумать о своем 🧋

custom 530096283560867473911584💋35🍓10💘5

3 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC≈1,300 views360 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

my nerd era is making a comeback 💜🥱

158custom 5300962835608674739106💘66🍓23💋4🕊3

2 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC≈1,170 views221 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⏰🍵random chinese words that i've learned recently 🌾腮红(sāi hóng)- румяна 🌾退热药 (tuì rè yào)- жаропонижающие 🌾点击 (diǎn jī)- нажать, кликнуть 🌾规律 (guī lǜ) — закономерность (со стороны природы, физиологии) 🌾划算 (huá suàn) — выгодный

87custom 547458669527594252183🍓43💘5💋3

30 Jul 2026, 12:08 UTC≈1,540 views303 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

安静的生活 🍵

custom 547458669527594252115490🕊37💘13💋5🍓4

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @mintteeaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 644,681 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“mint tea” (@mintteeaa), 6,482 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mintteeaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.