Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Just a Mino💥

@minorulove

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

73subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003327650055
TypeChannel
Username@minorulove
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/minorulove

Growth

687370.510 Aug 2026, 04:31 — 68 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 04:45 — 68 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 19:54 — 73 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 04:3110 Aug 2026, 19:54
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 67–74 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:5473+5
10 Aug 2026, 04:4568no change
10 Aug 2026, 04:3168first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
132.7%
avg views ÷ 73 subscribers
Avg views / post
96.8
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held19 (23 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,840
Reactions total245
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

245 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52492376639946457835321.6%
custom 52494478425142410035321.6%
custom 52514761708845494854518.4%
custom 52492016077441970353514.3%
custom 5267501265096578180197.76%
custom 5253474790966072314166.53%
custom 5249441047875980755156.12%
custom 526483802030083874552.04%
custom 526696308851451674541.63%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 245reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC40 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ребятки, а вот и коллаб. С великолепной https://t.me/Kari_sans. Уже второй, и мне безумно нравится.❤️ #minoru #notsosilent

custom 52492376639946457834custom 52675012650965781803custom 52494478425142410032custom 52534747909660723141

9 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC44 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Решила выложить сюда свою старую работу. Я делала этот арт еще когда только вышла глава с обрезанием волос Лью, но мне не нравилось что вырисовывается и не выложила. А сегодня, доделала и вроде бы выглядит не плохо.👀 #minoru #notsosilent

custom 52494478425142410039custom 52492016077441970355custom 52492376639946457834custom 52514761708845494851

8 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC54 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ребятушки, вас тут ждёт кое-какой интересный коллаб. Так что ожидайте в ближайшии деньки.😍

custom 524944784251424100310custom 52648380203008387455custom 52492016077441970353

4 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC96 views27 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Что ж, а вот и то над чем я работала. Я решила попробовать растушевать тени, и кажется теперь я буду делать так постоянно. 👍 #minoru #notsosilent

custom 524923766399464578316custom 52494478425142410037custom 52534747909660723144

4 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC92 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Боже мой, помогите. Ферну подойдет белое платье с блёстками или синие платье с блёстками?🥺 #minoru

custom 52514761708845494853

4 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC92 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Еще один спойлер. Сегодня закончу и покажу готовый результат.♟ #minoru #notsosilent

custom 52675012650965781807custom 52534747909660723146custom 52669630885145167453

3 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC77 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Спойлеров подкину пожалуй.♟ Лайн уже почти готов, решила по итогу в своём стиле сделать. Я еще боюсь делать реализм.😒 #minoru #notsosilent

custom 52514761708845494857custom 52492016077441970351custom 52669630885145167451

3 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC73 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ребятки, я скорее всего буду рисовать их в этом кадре. Но хочу попробовать в реализме, поэтому это займет какое-то время, не судите строго. Буду первый раз пробовать чет такое.🥺 #minoru

custom 52494410478759807553

3 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC76 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Боже, я в этом кадре вижу Ферна и Льюиса. Угадайте что я сегодня буду рисовать?🥺 #minoru

custom 52492016077441970358

1 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC84 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Немного поделюсь своими мыслями.⭐️ До появления меня в соцсетях я с детства рисовала на бумаге. Но потом у меня случился арт блок, и я не трогала бумагу с карандашом 3 года. А когда вернулась в эту сферу перешла сразу на планшет. Попробовав сейчас порисовать на бумаге, я честно ощутила себя словно заново учусь рисовать. Я не чувствую бумагу, карандаш, нажим и т.д.😥 Правду всё таки говорят, что после рисования в гр

custom 52494478425142410039

1 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC80 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ох. Держите скетчик небольшой от меня. Решила попробовать порисовать на бумаге после больше полугода рисования на планшете.🥹 Но мои навыки рисования на бумаге явно хуже. Пхпхп.🫢 Если вам понравится, я могу так же свои зарисовки в скетчбуке показать в дальнейшем.👉 #minoru #notsosilent

custom 524923766399464578310custom 52534747909660723145

30 Jul 2026, 03:53 UTC93 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ребятушки, у меня завалы по работе, времени и сил совсем нет на рисовашки. Поэтому не теряйте, в выходные устрою целый марафон рисунков.🥺 #minoru

custom 52492376639946457838custom 52514761708845494853

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @minorulove. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 751,122 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Just a Mino💥” (@minorulove), 73 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/minorulove.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.