Bonito dΓa amor πββοΈβ€οΈ
β€269π₯69π30π₯°25π10β€βπ₯9π±5π4

Channel
@miniakane1
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
55,882subscribers
+7,987 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623β100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003562486295 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @miniakane1 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miniakane1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:38 | 55,882 | +331 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 55,551 | +120 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:04 | 55,431 | +48 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 55,383 | +140 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 55,243 | +363 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 54,880 | +190 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:24 | 54,690 | +15 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 54,675 | -39 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 54,714 | +20 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 54,694 | +34 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 54,660 | +266 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 54,394 | +327 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 54,067 | +175 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 53,892 | +261 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 53,631 | +452 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 53,179 | +920 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:53 | 52,259 | +897 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 51,362 | +737 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 50,625 | +348 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 50,277 | first reading |
69 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 69 (28 July 2026 β 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,446,990 |
| Reactions total | 91,135 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 17:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
116,368 reactions across 69 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 66,479 | 57.1% | |
| π₯ | 20,040 | 17.2% | |
| π | 13,513 | 11.6% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 5,019 | 4.31% | |
| π₯° | 4,833 | 4.15% | |
| π | 3,156 | 2.71% | |
| π | 555 | 0.477% | |
| π | 491 | 0.422% | |
| π | 469 | 0.403% | |
| π | 458 | 0.394% | |
| π₯΄ | 240 | 0.206% | |
| π | 206 | 0.177% | |
| π³ | 182 | 0.156% | |
| π | 163 | 0.14% | |
| π€ | 99 | 0.085% | |
| π | 75 | 0.064% | |
| π | 54 | 0.046% | |
| πΎ | 42 | 0.036% | |
| π€ͺ | 42 | 0.036% | |
| π± | 28 | 0.024% | |
| 19 further kinds | 224 | 0.192% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 69 of the 69 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 116,368 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bonito dΓa amor πββοΈβ€οΈ
β€269π₯69π30π₯°25π10β€βπ₯9π±5π4
Como me queda este vestido bb? π€π€
β€672π₯215π141π43β€βπ₯32π16π11π5
Te bailo amor? πβ€οΈ
β€672π₯189π102π₯°50β€βπ₯34π24π9π³6
Como va tu tarde amor? π
β€931π₯312π168β€βπ₯82π42π17π17π₯°16
Lindo dΓa amor π€π©·
β€785π₯167π154β€βπ₯45π29π₯°10π9π8
Tus favoritas π€β€οΈ https://t.me/makimachavv1
β€768π₯233π119π₯°56π26β€βπ₯25π16π10
Lindo inicio de semana amor ππ
β€988π254π₯179β€βπ₯93π25π₯°17π14π10
Tu bulma favorita π
β€1,000π₯324π181π80β€βπ₯47π24π18π₯°16
Un corazoncito para ti bb, recuerda la promo π€π₯° https://onlyfans.com/miniakanee
β€997π₯315π151π₯°79π68β€βπ₯41π28π8
Ya te uniste amor? Ven y hablamos rico esta noche π€π«¦
β€1,180π₯403π261β€βπ₯100π76π36π11π9
Ya vienes? Estoy esperΓ‘ndote amorπ promo activa πβ₯οΈ https://onlyfans.com/miniakanee
β€970π253π₯172π₯°77π51β€βπ₯48π³12π₯΄9
Amor tengo promo disponible π€ aprovecha y vienes a hablar conmigo, estarΓ© subiendo cositas ricas π«¦β₯οΈ https://onlyfans.com/miniakanee
π811π₯448β€348β€βπ₯103π65π26π24π17
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @miniakane1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βMiniakanee oficialπ»ππΊπΈβ (@miniakane1), 55,882 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miniakane1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.