Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Luxury Minho This&That

@minhogux

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,585subscribers

+136 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001959866961
TypeChannel
Username@minhogux
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/minhogux

Growth

6,4496,5856,5176 August 2026 — 6,449 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,449 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,512 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,585 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +136. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,429–6,605 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:286,585+73
10 Aug 2026, 12:456,512+63
7 Aug 2026, 02:086,449no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:216,449first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.71%
avg views ÷ 6,585 subscribers
Avg views / post
244
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 49 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held49 (6 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total11,970
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
58s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
131
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 49 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @minhogux. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC124 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @az3milotePhoto

Совместная Лота На Этот Нфт От Azemilote и FrostLina Подписка на оба канала обязательна, репост в актив чат/пиар чат/свой архив

11 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC133 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @xarchivefelixPhoto

Tiktok update #banglix w bangchan

11 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC105 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @xarchivefelixPhoto

🌸You know what ħe said to mē? 🤩What? He was like, 🤩 “You Aře so rude” 🫥And I wäs like, “Bôy does it looķ like I cøuld care?”🤩🤩

11 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC139 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @FrostLina1Photo

Совместная Лота 💎/💎 Подписка на каналы @TrueSoftPlay и @R7Shine репост в исд/чаты/каналы Актив в каналах! Результаты скоро вкл увед

10 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC686 viewsread 12 August 2026

Лота на ряд 🧸/💝 @truemina , @swweetgyu Репост увеличивает шанс выигрыша!

Signed Best Random Bot 🎁 [Конкурсный бот для розыгрышей | Рандомайзер]

9 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC≈1,000 views0 reactions20 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

9 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC≈1,110 views0 reactions50 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

260809 @.내꺼💛 Bubble Update

9 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC869 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

260809 @.Stray_Kids Twitter Update 삶이 힘들게 느껴질 때, 2026 SBS 가요대전 여름편을 보세요♥️ 에어컨 필요 없어요! 가요대전 사진만 봐도 기분이 좋아져요 🫧 4.💫

8 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC615 views0 reactions20 Starsread 10 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @minhogux. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 30,068 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Luxury Minho This&That” (@minhogux), 6,585 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/minhogux.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.