Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Min on Web3

@minfanton

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

63,158subscribers

-1,170 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002157559387
TypeChannel
Username@minfanton
Description💎Focus on Web3 Ecosystem: · News · Onchain · Technical Trading · Airdrops · Events/Giveaway Project promotion Contact: @nelsonlib Business&Partner Contact: @nelsonlib
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/minfanton

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@minfanton/75 · this entry12 Sept 2025, 14:13 UTC@gemhunter_channel/26812 Sept 2025, 14:21 UTC1.007 minutes
@minfanton/77 · this entry19 Sept 2025, 16:02 UTC@gemhunter_channel/27019 Sept 2025, 16:03 UTC1.0072 seconds
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@gemhunter_channel10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (100)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 12 September 2025 to 5 May 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @minfanton — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

63,15864,32863,7437 August 2026 — 64,328 subscribers7 August 2026 — 64,296 subscribers8 August 2026 — 64,149 subscribers9 August 2026 — 63,960 subscribers10 August 2026 — 63,670 subscribers12 August 2026 — 63,158 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 4 days, net -1,170. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62,983–64,504 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 00:2263,158-512
10 Aug 2026, 21:3763,670-290
9 Aug 2026, 18:2263,960-189
8 Aug 2026, 20:3764,149-147
7 Aug 2026, 23:1764,296-32
7 Aug 2026, 13:0164,328first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 12 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
23
Links
15

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3093.8%
👍13.13%
🔥13.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2025 to 5 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 May 2026, 11:02 UTC≈1,080 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚀 Make TON Great Again TON ecosystem is in motion. Volume across TON-native tokens is back to multi-month highs. Trade in Tonkeeper: ✈️ TON is up 30% today, claiming the 20th spot on CoinMarketCap, passing Litecoin and Avalanche ✈️ NOT is up 30% over the past few days and has been listed on Revolut ✈️ DOGS is up 125% today ✈️ UTYA is doing all time highs, showing 400% increase in the past few days ✈️ TAC is up ove

16 Apr 2026, 07:19 UTC≈1,200 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

New Testnet : LiteForge Testnet Live LitVM launched LiteForge testnet Now Litecoin gets: • Smart contracts • DeFi applications • Web3 ecosystem • zkLTC powered network 🪂 Register : https://testnet.litvm.com/ ➖ Connect New Wallet / Wallet Testnet ➖ Claim Faucet HERE ➖ Explore features ➖ Try testnet apps 1. Explorer Here 2. lester-labs Here ➖ Connect your Wallet ➖ Deploy Token 3. MidasHand Here ➖ Create Market

5

27 Mar 2026, 07:49 UTC≈1,460 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁Z-Zero Giveaway #1 We are officially competing in the Tether Hackathon on Dorahacks! We’re building the payment rails for the Ai Agentic Commerce era where AI Agents can transact autonomously, securely, and without borders. If you believe in the future of AI native payments, we need your support! 🎁 GIVEAWAY: 10 lucky winners will receive $10 each! How to enter: 1️⃣ Follow Z-Zero MCP on X 2️⃣ Like & RT this post.

2

21 Mar 2026, 10:42 UTC≈1,490 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Instant $E FCFS (5 per claim) Join: > https://t.me/EverythingTradeOfficial_bot?start=SBT_AjaySingh - Do your check-in - bind your email - done Wait for more information 📌

2🔥1

17 Mar 2026, 14:14 UTC≈1,560 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Hey fam, just checking if you are active

  1. Yes 👍68%
  2. Little bit 😐32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2

11 Feb 2026, 07:58 UTC≈5,580 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Jump into the Binance game and grab those red packets, bros! 🔥Play it quick and auto-claim $0.18 – $18.88 Whoever snags the big ones, drop your screenshots here ❤️‍🔥 let's see who’s winning big!

3

9 Jan 2026, 04:58 UTC≈6,720 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💥💥CZ just called it a GAME CHANGER! 🎁 Predict.fun - the BNB Chain-native prediction market backed by CZ & YZi Labs - is teaming up with Venus Protocol! 🤔 Prediction markets are THE trend exploding in 2026. Polymarket volumes are going parabolic, and on-chain versions like this are next-level with DeFi integration. Get in EARLY on Predict.fun before the masses pile in! 👇👇

3

19 Nov 2025, 07:41 UTC≈6,830 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Don't Miss This Base Opportunity! ⚡️ We don't know the full details yet, but when the founder of Base is signaling this, we ape in! Don't miss out. 🔗 Claim yours here: https://firstdollar.money/?r=g2O3FJ Just click the link, connect your Gmail & X account🔥

29 Oct 2025, 06:54 UTC≈7,500 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Metamask APP Update: Now you can update your Android app if you haven't already. Season 1 will last for 90 days and starts with over $30M in LINEA tokens, for both OGs and newer users.

4

28 Oct 2025, 09:47 UTC≈7,040 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁 Grab MetaMask Airdrop — Join the MetaMask Rewards Campaign 🎁 This campaign is for users of MetaMask mobile! 1. Open the MetaMask mobile app. 2. Visit the MetaMask rewards page 3. Tap Get the App to update your MetaMask app (if needed). 4. Reopen the MetaMask app and go to Rewards. 5. Enter referral code DR9C8H to support us. 🙌 Tips to earn more points: - Add additional eligible wallets via Settings → Add Walle

1

27 Oct 2025, 04:25 UTC≈2,300 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

New Airdrops: Anitya 🏷 Reward : Earn $LIFE points and climb the leaderboard to unlock LifeForms NFTs and $ANITYA token allocations 🪂 Register : ANITYA ➖ Connect SOL New Wallet ➖ Complete All Task ➖ Done 📌AI-powered & collaborative game engine + Web 3 cross platform IP attribution for creators Build once, publish everywhere, own forever Mother of @LifeFormsNFT

👍1

3 Oct 2025, 06:40 UTC≈7,340 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥 2 Days Left Aster Airdrop – The Next Big Perp DEX Backed by CZ and YZi Labs! 🔥 Aster – a decentralized perpetual exchange (Perp DEX) built on its own Aster Chain – is making waves after merging APX Finance and Astherus. With backing from YZi Labs (ex-Binance Labs) and even CZ shilling it hard on X, you know this isn’t just hype. 🚀 How to Join Aster Airdrop: 1️⃣ Go to Aster and log in with your EVM wallet 2️⃣ Dep

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @minfanton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Mar 2026, 14:14 UTCAnonymous Poll53 voters

Hey fam, just checking if you are active

  1. Yes 👍68%
  2. Little bit 😐32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2025 to 5 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 316,297 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Min on Web3” (@minfanton), 63,158 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/minfanton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.