Sizda ham yuqoridagi muammolar bormi? 💬 Mindskills platformasiga ulanish va bepul maslahat olish uchun @Mindskills_uz_admin ga yozing! 💻 @mindskills_uz - eng yaxshi mental arifmetika platformasi

Channel
Mindskills O’zbekiston - Rasmiy
@mindskills_uz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,775subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001695773343 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mindskills_uz |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mindskills_uz |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 2,775 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:11 | 2,781 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:40 | 2,777 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 2,776 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 24.1%
- avg views ÷ 2,775 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 668
- 21 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.311%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 21
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (22 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,036 |
| Reactions total | 25 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 9m 13s
- Average length
- 43s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
25 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 44.0% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 44.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 4.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Mindskills bilan darsda qo'llash uchun qiziqarli o'yin ✅O'yin qoidasi: Bolalarni videodagidek navbat bilan qator terib olamiz, birma-bir misol ishlashadi, xato qilgan bola joyiga o'tiradi, kim oxirida qolsa, g'olib bo'ladi 🥳 ➡️“Platforma kerak” deb @Mindskills_uz_admin ga yozing. Dastlabki yozgan 3 kishiga — ajoyib kitob sovg‘a! 💻 @mindskills_uz — natijani ustuvor ko‘radigan ustozlar tanlovi
👍1
Mindskills bilan uyga vazifa tekshirishga 2 daqiqadan ko'p vaqt sarflamaysiz! Mindskillsdan foydalanishni boshlang: • 70% vaqtingizni tejaydi, • uyga vazifa tekshirmaysiz, • misol tuzmaysiz, • davomatni platforma ichida qilasiz! Platformaga ulaning uchun telegram orqali @mindskills_uz_admin ga yozing! 💻 @mindskills_uz - eng yaxshi mental arifmetika platformasi
Mindskills bilan onlayn darslarni o’tish ham oson “Platforma kerak” deb @Mindskills_uz_admin ga yozing. Dastlabki yozgan 3 kishiga — ajoyib kitob sovg‘a! 💻 @mindskills_uz — natijani ustuvor ko‘radigan ustozlar tanlovi
15-avgustda bo'ladigan UstozPro vodiy olimpiadasi uchun onlayn tayyorgarlik ko'ryapmiz! Tayyorgarlik Mindskills platformasida bo'lib o'tdi. ⌨️ @mindskills_uz - eng yaxshi mental arifmetika platformasi
👍1
Ustoz Rahimov Malaka oshirishga kelgan shogirdlaridan pora oldi, - deb o'ylabmiz, lekin... Malaka oshirish kursining mental arifmetika ustozlari uchun foydalari: • bilimdagi bo‘shliqlarni to‘ldiradi • darsni yanada samarali va tushunarli o‘tishni o‘rgatadi • o‘quvchilar natijasini oshirish usullarini beradi • chempion o‘quvchilar tayyorlash yo‘llarini ko‘rsatadi • ota-onalar bilan to‘g‘ri va samarali muloqot o‘rnati…
Mindskills platformasidan hoziroq foydalinishni boshlang va mindskillsning mental arifmetika kitobini sovg’aga oling! Shoshiling, vaqt oz qoldi, @Mindskills_uz_admin ga yozing. Mindskills oylik to’lovlari: 1 oy 1ta o'quvchi uchun - 10 000 so’m 1 oy 1ta trener uchun - 75 000 so’m 1 oy 1ta trener + 5ta o’quvchi uchun - 99 000 so’m 3 oy 1ta trener uchun - 204 000 so’m 6 oy 1ta trener uchun - 360 000 so’m 9 oy 1ta tre…
👍2
Darslaringizda barcha muammolarni yechimi - Sertifikatsiyalashmi? Bu sertifikatsiyalash o’quvchilarning 2 ko’nikmasini baholaydi: abakusda hisoblash va tasavvurda hisoblash ko’nikmasi. Har bir ko’nikmadan jami 12ta daraja bor. Va yana juda qulaylari ko’p: 1) O’quvchingiz qaysi daraja chiqqanini aniq bilasiz va ota-onasiga ham ayta olasiz; 2) Qachon farzandim mental arifmetikani to’liq o’rganib bo’ladi degan ota ona…
❤2
Mindskills platformasi judayam yaxshi va biz pedagoglar uchun platformada dars õtish qulay .Õquvchilar judaham yaxshi misollarni qiziqib ishlashadi natijalariham judaham yaxshi .
Iqrokids õquv markaziga minnaddarchilik bildiraman bizga mana shundey platformalar taqdim etganiga barcha iqrokids jamoasi õz ishlariga ma'sulyat bilan yondashishgan va har bir õqituvchilar bilan yaxshi muomulada bõlishadi ishlarizga omad
7 yoshli bolakay ustozsiz Mindskills yordamida Abakusda 0.4 va tasavvurda 0.3 sekundda ishlaydigan darajaga chiqibdi Otalari mashg'ulot o'tkazgan “Platforma kerak” deb @Mindskills_uz_admin ga yozing. Dastlabki yozgan 3 kishiga — ajoyib kitob sovg‘a! 💻 @mindskills_uz — natijani ustuvor ko‘radigan ustozlar tanlovi
👍2❤1
❓ Nega mental arifmetikada platforma bilan mashq qilish muhim? Chunki oddiy daftar yoki kitob bilan ishlaganda bola zerikib qoladi, natijalar sekin o‘sadi. Platforma esa — tezlik, aniqlik, motivatsiya va qiziqishning eng kuchli vositasi. Mindskills platformasi aynan shu maqsadda yaratilgan: • Topshiriqlar darajaga qarab joylashtiriladi; • Har bir mashq vaqti aniqlik bilan nazorat qilinadi; • Har bir xato tahlil q…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @mindskills_uz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 82,240 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mindskills O’zbekiston - Rasmiy” (@mindskills_uz), 2,775 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mindskills_uz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.