Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Аппельберг

Channel

Аппельберг

@minarety

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,138subscribers

-90 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001099457411
TypeChannel
Username@minarety
DescriptionАвторский блог журналистки и востоковеда Александры Аппельберг о геополитике и международных отношениях на Ближнем Востоке и в Израиле. Попытка разобраться, что к чему в самом взрывоопасном регионе планеты. You can write me smth nice: @alexandra_appelberg
Created5 January 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/minarety

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 34% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,1388,2478,192.55 August 2026 — 8,228 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,228 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,239 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,240 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,245 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,247 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,242 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,239 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,231 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,225 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,208 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,193 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,189 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,184 subscribers28 September 2026 — 8,168 subscribers6 October 2026 — 8,167 subscribers13 October 2026 — 8,151 subscribers16 October 2026 — 8,145 subscribers19 October 2026 — 8,153 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,147 subscribers28 October 2026 — 8,156 subscribers31 October 2026 — 8,151 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,144 subscribers6 November 2026 — 8,138 subscribers5 August 20266 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 93 days, net -90. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,122–8,263 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 11:318,138-6
3 Nov 2026, 21:058,144-7
31 Oct 2026, 16:348,151-5
28 Oct 2026, 17:198,156+9
26 Oct 2026, 00:278,147-6
19 Oct 2026, 05:188,153+8
16 Oct 2026, 12:048,145-6
13 Oct 2026, 01:508,151-16
6 Oct 2026, 10:588,167-1
28 Sept 2026, 23:168,168-16
18 Sept 2026, 22:008,184-5
14 Sept 2026, 03:588,189-4
10 Sept 2026, 14:188,193-15
5 Sept 2026, 14:008,208-17
1 Sept 2026, 15:138,225-6
30 Aug 2026, 01:168,231-8
23 Aug 2026, 23:048,239-3
20 Aug 2026, 02:488,242-5
16 Aug 2026, 17:228,247+2
12 Aug 2026, 17:248,245first reading

Engagement

54 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.5%
avg views ÷ 8,138 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,380
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 54 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held54 (28 June 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total74,280
Reactions total1,329
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 01:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
562
Videos
36
Links
874

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
27s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,402 reactions across 53 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,39741.1%
👍1,24036.4%
😢3219.44%
🤔2447.17%
💔2005.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,402 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (18.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 07:32 UTC≈1,360 views31 reactionsread 11 November 2026

⬆️ Начало «Блок перемен» также говорит об укреплении демократических норм, в частности, отмене юридической реформы прошлого правительства. Но будет ли этого достаточно для восстановления пошатнувшегося в глазах американцев и американских евреев образа «единственной демократии»? Особенно если новости о поселенческом насилии на Западном берегу продолжат поступать, и там опять покалечат или убьют каких-нибудь американс…

👍18❤9🤔4

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

9 Nov 2026, 07:32 UTC≈1,330 views33 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Отношения США и Израиля переживают худший период за многие годы. Кажется, что теперь, после усиления демократов в конгрессе, ситуация может только ухудшиться. Но и с республиканцами всё не так просто: вице-президент Джей Ди Вэнс привёл среди причин ухода избирателей от республиканцев пожелание «изменить отношения с Израилем», а президент Трамп признал, что «похоже, есть неприязнь к Израилю». Гади Айзенкот говорит, ч…

❤13👍13🤔6💔1

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

5 Nov 2026, 11:37 UTC≈2,090 views58 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Война в Иране повлияла на промежуточные выборы в США (что признали сам Дональд Трамп и его вице-президент Джей Ди Вэнс). Но выборы едва ли серьёзно повлияют на войну. Несмотря на поражение республиканцев, вероятность новой эскалации никуда не делась. Напротив, чувство уязвлённости может стать для Трампа триггером к тому, чтобы нанести новые удары. Терять ему уже нечего, и логика подсказывает, что если уж и возобновл…

💔18🤔15❤10👍9😢6

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

3 Nov 2026, 19:53 UTC≈2,260 views58 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @vostochnysyndrome

🔴Израиль поделился с США разведывательными данными, согласно которым Иран рассматривает возможность применения химического оружия против своих противников. Эта информация вызвала обеспокоенность у некоторых американских чиновников и глубокий скептицизм у других, сообщает газета The New York Times со ссылкой на источники в США и регионе. Комментарий эксперта по Ирану, бывшего высокопоставленного руководителя военной …

🤔29👍16❤6💔5😢2

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

3 Nov 2026, 14:32 UTC≈2,740 views69 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Ого! Дональд Трамп заявил, что «достиг соглашения» с Нетаниягу о прекращении военной помощи Израилю в размере около 4 млрд долларов в год. В начале года Нетаниягу говорил, что Израиль откажется от американской помощи в течение ближайших десяти лет, но, видимо, пошёл на опережение плана. Примерно как иранская угроза, которую в 2025 году устранили «на поколения» вперед, но уже через несколько месяцев пришлось устранят…

👍37😢14🤔11❤7

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

29 Oct 2026, 17:17 UTC≈3,920 views125 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @mamadpolsci

За кого наголосовали? Кажется, почти 80 лет Израиль делал вид, что в стране есть одна группа населения, с существованием которой приходится мириться, но было бы гораздо удобнее, если бы она не особенно отсвечивала – израильские арабы/палестинцы. И значительная часть арабского политического истеблишмента была готова играть по этим правилам: сионисты — враги, сотрудничество с ними — легитимация сионистского государств…

❤76👍37🤔12

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

28 Oct 2026, 08:26 UTC≈3,340 views96 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Всегда должен быть план Б. Шутка, к войне вернусь.

😢47💔28❤16👍4🤔1

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

28 Oct 2026, 04:05 UTC≈3,160 views46 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @Davayte_Razberemsia

Сейчас начнётся бессмысленная аналитика результатов, игнорируйте и ждите +- четверга утром, когда досчитают двойные конверты.

👍40❤3🤔3

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

27 Oct 2026, 17:54 UTC≈3,390 views123 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Три раза подходила к избирательному участку, видела очередь и разворачивалась, чтобы вернуться позднее (живу в трех минутах). Люди, которые всю жизнь живут и голосуют в этом районе, говорят, что никогда такого не видели. На четвертый раз-таки проголосовала.

❤91👍28🤔4

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

27 Oct 2026, 16:29 UTC≈3,020 views48 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Да иду я, иду

❤34👍14

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

27 Oct 2026, 16:29 UTC≈2,960 views43 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @israelkorotkooglavnom

Бен Каспит: явка избирателей в Тель-Авиве более чем на 5 процентных пунктов ниже среднего показателя по стране. Израиль. Коротко о главном

😢22💔13❤6👍2

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

27 Oct 2026, 09:44 UTC≈4,540 views106 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Сегодня день выборов, и в воздухе чувствуется оптимизм. Явка к этому часу самая большая с 1981 года. Это хорошо. Но, пожалуй, стоит несколько поумерить ожидания — чтобы потом не испытывать лишнего разочарования. Важно понимать, что эти выборы могут изменить, а что — нет. Даже если придёт правительство перемен, курс Израиля останется примерно тем же. Изменится стиль, но не направление. Большинство партий оппозицион…

👍53💔26❤17😢8🤔2

Signed Alexandra Appelberg

Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @minarety. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @minarety as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
10 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTCAnonymous Poll540 voters

Поиграем в Polymarket?

  1. СА нормализует отношения с Израилем12%
  2. СА не нормализует отношения с Израилем, сделка сорвётся15%
  3. СА не нормализует отношения с Израилем, но сделка состоится44%
  4. СА нормализует отношения с Израилем, но только после поражения Нетаниягу на выборах29%
  5. Конгресс взбунтуется не одобрит сделку11%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Исламизм от иноагента
@irandezhurniy · 21,763
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 September 2026
Фалафельная
@mideastr · 20,984
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 September 2026
Стальной шлем
@stahlhelm · 20,635
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 September 2026
В кулуарах Залива
@kuluary_zaliva · 27,820
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
Продавец фиников
@mayofis · 26,998
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
Первый ближневосточный | Иран 🇮🇷 | Ливан 🇱🇧 | Йемен 🇾🇪
@kief_point · 52,978
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Пробковый шлем
@pithhelmet · 23,215
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026
Восточный Синдром
@vostochnysyndrome · 82,981
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
Центральное Болото
@iraq_rusproj · 23,617
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026
One Big Union
@one_big_union · 20,018
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 September 2026
Пелливерт | Израиль | Политика
@pellivert · 41,473
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 August 2026
Дмитрий Дубов
@dubovd · 38,572
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
The Peacemaker
@migdalsergei · 25,960
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
Обзиратель. Война на Ближнем Востоке ⚔️
@obzirate1 · 36,809
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Аппельберг” (@minarety), 8,138 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/minarety.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.