Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

گردآفریدِ‌‌ شعر

@mina_vasegh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

203subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002242744072
TypeChannel
Username@mina_vasegh
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mina_vasegh

Growth

203204203.58 August 2026 — 204 subscribers8 August 2026 — 204 subscribers15 August 2026 — 203 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 203–204 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 05:13203-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:19204no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:00204first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
87.2%
avg views ÷ 203 subscribers
Avg views / post
177
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (21 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,539
Reactions total139
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

139 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11381.3%
💔128.63%
👍42.88%
👎42.88%
❤‍🔥32.16%
🔥21.44%
🕊10.719%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC60 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

شرمنده‌ام اگر که ز غم حرف می‌زنم آشفته‌ام برای خودم حرف می‌زنم #میناواثق

16❤‍🔥3🕊1

4 Aug 2026, 22:26 UTC91 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

چشم‌هایت چه قدر گویا بود روز آخر که گریه می‌کردی چه نیازی به دوستت دارم! در ره عشق، واژه رهزن بود... #میناواثق

11👍2

2 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC131 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

چرا هنوز در دلم نشسته‌ای...؟ برو من و تو هیچ کاره‌ی همیم #میناواثق

💔122🔥2

1 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC149 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

امشب از دور در کنار تو ام...

3

31 Jul 2026, 22:53 UTC167 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

-دردمو زیاد می‌کنی مانولین... از من چی می‌خوای؟ بخت بدم رو؟ +خیله خب! تو می‌خوای بگی که به بخت بد اعتقاد داری؟ باشه! حالا منم اعتقاد دارم، خوبه؟ بخت بدتو می‌خوام... آره می‌‌خوام... از هیچی هم نمی‌ترسم! -تو خیلی جرئت داری مانولین! +من هیچی ندارم! هیچی! اما می‌خوام از تو بگیرم... می‌خوام با من قسمتش کنی... نه! نمی‌خوام قسمت کنی... همه‌ش مال من هر چی که بده مال من :) [پیرمرد و دریا]

8

31 Jul 2026, 21:30 UTC182 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

فروغ فرخزاد را باید در کلیت کارنامه و مسیر تحول شعری‌اش سنجید، نه بر پایه‌ی چند شعر یا چند سطر جداافتاده. اهمیت او در شعر معاصر فارسی، حاصلِ ترکیبِ صداقت عاطفی، جسارت زبانی، تصویرسازی‌های تازه و تواناییِ تبدیل تجربه‌ی شخصی به مسئله‌ای انسانی و اجتماعی است. شعر فروغ، به‌ویژه در دوره‌ی پختگی، از اعتراف فردی فراتر می‌رود و به تأملی عمیق درباره‌ی تنهایی، عشق، مرگ، آزادی و وضعیت انسان بدل می‌شود. ارزش ادبی یک شاعر نیز تنه

14👎4👍2

31 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC270 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

خون می‌چکد از دیده در این کنج صبوری این صبر که من می‌کنم افشردن جان است #سایه

7

30 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTC171 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

چه مهربان بودی ای یار، ای یگانه‌ترین یار چه مهربان بودی وقتی دروغ میگفتی #فروغ

7

30 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC165 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

و در شهادت یک شمع راز منوری است که آنرا آن آخرین و آن کشیده‌ترین شعله خوب میداند. #فروغ

7

30 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC166 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

و من چنان پرم که روی صدایم نماز میخوانند … #فروغ

7

30 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC145 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

من از کجا میآیم؟ من از کجا میآیم؟ که اینچنین به بوی شب آغشته‌ام؟ هنوز خاک مزارش تازه‌ست مزار آن دو دست سبز جوان را میگویم … #فروغ

7

30 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC345 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

چرا نگاه نکردم؟ تمام لحظه‌های سعادت میدانستند که دست‌های تو ویران خواهد شد و من نگاه نکردم تا آن زمان که پنجره‌ی ساعت گشوده‌شد و آن قناری غمگین چهار بار نواخت چهار بار نواخت #فروغ

6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mina_vasegh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 780,894 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“گردآفریدِ‌‌ شعر” (@mina_vasegh), 203 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mina_vasegh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.