Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Марго | Дизайн без понтов 🔥

Channel

Марго | Дизайн без понтов 🔥

@million_s_margo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,188subscribers

-69 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001622710355
TypeChannel
Username@million_s_margo
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 October 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/million_s_margo

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,4974,2633,8807 August 2026 — 4,257 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,257 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,258 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,257 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,263 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,258 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,497 subscribers1 October 2026 — 4,188 subscribers4,1887 August 20261 October 2026
8 measurements spanning 55 days, net -69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,382–4,378 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Oct 2026, 02:404,188+691
20 Aug 2026, 05:423,497-761
17 Aug 2026, 14:194,258-5
13 Aug 2026, 23:254,263+6
10 Aug 2026, 14:414,257-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:434,258+1
7 Aug 2026, 08:314,257no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:264,257first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
2s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

139 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6143.9%
❤4431.7%
👍75.04%
⚡64.32%
💯64.32%
❤‍🔥42.88%
🙏42.88%
🤗32.16%
🍾21.44%
👏10.719%
🥰10.719%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 17:34 UTC184 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

С чего начать в дизайне если у вас ноль опыта и ноль понимания Меня об этом спрашивают довольно часто — с чего начать в дизайне если вообще ноль? Нет опыта, нет образования, непонятно куда смотреть и что учить. Сегодня отвечу честно и по делу. 1️⃣ Первое — определитесь с направлением. Графический дизайн, UI/UX, моушн, дизайн презентаций, инфографика, веб-дизайн — всё это разные истории с разными инструментами и раз…

❤2

23 Jul 2026, 18:28 UTC235 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Напихала 100500 работ в портфолио, а клиентов — ноль? 🤔 Как так? Есть две категории портфолио у дизайнеров. 1️⃣ Портфолио, которое просто есть. Ну есть и слава богу! 2️⃣ Портфолио, которое работает. Приводит клиентов и приносит деньги. И разница между ними совсем не в красоте и не в количестве работ. 💜💜💜 Приведу пример. Приходит ко мне человек с проблемой: «Нет клиентов. Есть портфолио, отправляю его — никто н…

🔥5❤1🤗1

6 Jul 2026, 09:39 UTC443 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Я уже писала про нейросети в целом — про то, что они не заберут работу у дизайнеров, а скорее разделят всех на две категории: 👉 тех, кто умеет с ними работать; 👉 и тех, кто пока нет. Сегодня хочу рассказать конкретнее — что лично я делаю через Claude каждый день. Потому что для меня это уже давно не эксперимент, а обычная часть рабочего процесса. Начиналось всё стандартно: ✔️ написать текст ✔️ придумать заголовок…

🔥5👍4

11 Jun 2026, 07:11 UTC668 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⁉️Меня периодически спрашивают — а ты не боишься, что нейросети в итоге заберут твою работу как дизайнера? 😱 Честно — нет. Потому что мне кажется, здесь важно не просто сказать «не боюсь», а разобраться, откуда вообще этот страх берётся. ➡️Я слышу разговоры про то, что «дизайнеры скоро будут не нужны» уже не первый год. Сначала все переживали из-за Canva — мол, теперь любой сам себе дизайнер. Потом из-за шаблонов. …

🔥6

3 Jun 2026, 10:34 UTC715 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Если вы давно здесь и заметили, что я не особо регулярно веду этот канал — вы правы, и я не буду делать вид, что это не так 😅 Если честно, это говорит о том, что я сама долго не могла определиться с тем, каким именно должен быть этот канал и что я хочу здесь делать. Я писала об этом раньше — про то, что меняю стратегию, пересобираю подход к работе и пытаюсь выстроить всё так, чтобы это было комфортно в первую очеред…

❤11🔥9👍3

7 May 2026, 09:56 UTC872 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @neirohaksPhoto

🚨 ВНИМАНИЕ. МАЙСКАЯ ПРОВЕРКА ПОКАЗАЛА НАРУШЕНИЯ. Вы подозреваетесь в систематическом сливе возможностей, пока другие уже зарабатывают с помощью нейросетей. 📂 Дело №AI-MAY-2026 «Использование нейросетей на уровне "ну я попробовал, херня какаита"». По данным следствия, за последние месяцы вы: ➖ открывали ChatGPT «на 5 минут» ➖ пытались писать промпты ➖ получали странную нейродичь ➖ психовали и закрывали вкладку ➖ с…

🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @million_s_margo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ПРОЕКТ «INSTART»
@instartofficial · 45,600
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 28 August 2026
Мария Богданова | Продвижение pinterest
@bogmasha_pinterest · 27,582
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Марго | Дизайн без понтов 🔥” (@million_s_margo), 4,188 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/million_s_margo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.