Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for зависимая от внешности

Channel

зависимая от внешности

@miller_girlss_vonenism

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

31,347subscribers

-44 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002053180579
TypeChannel
Username@miller_girlss_vonenism
Description⟡ · ⊹ . ° ୨୧ ◌ ゚ . ⊹ ⟡ твой канал для мотивации!! > > Купить рекламу: @deliriumu, @grek_rek, @maxddnk или Купить рекламу: https://telega.in/c/miller_girlss_vonenism
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/miller_girlss_vonenism

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

30,79133,79432,292.57 August 2026 — 31,391 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,391 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,362 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,333 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,295 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,268 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,245 subscribers13 August 2026 — 31,219 subscribers14 August 2026 — 31,135 subscribers16 August 2026 — 31,073 subscribers17 August 2026 — 31,010 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,959 subscribers19 August 2026 — 30,916 subscribers20 August 2026 — 30,883 subscribers21 August 2026 — 30,831 subscribers23 August 2026 — 30,791 subscribers24 August 2026 — 32,031 subscribers25 August 2026 — 32,132 subscribers26 August 2026 — 32,386 subscribers27 August 2026 — 32,381 subscribers28 August 2026 — 32,387 subscribers29 August 2026 — 32,354 subscribers30 August 2026 — 32,305 subscribers31 August 2026 — 33,110 subscribers1 September 2026 — 33,794 subscribers2 September 2026 — 32,225 subscribers3 September 2026 — 32,130 subscribers6 September 2026 — 32,006 subscribers9 September 2026 — 31,846 subscribers11 September 2026 — 31,735 subscribers13 September 2026 — 31,628 subscribers15 September 2026 — 31,545 subscribers16 September 2026 — 31,459 subscribers19 September 2026 — 31,361 subscribers26 September 2026 — 31,347 subscribers31,3477 August 202626 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net -44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,341–34,244 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 04:2031,347-14
19 Sept 2026, 08:1831,361-98
16 Sept 2026, 21:3631,459-86
15 Sept 2026, 03:1631,545-83
13 Sept 2026, 14:1831,628-107
11 Sept 2026, 20:0131,735-111
9 Sept 2026, 10:5931,846-160
6 Sept 2026, 02:1832,006-124
3 Sept 2026, 23:1632,130-95
2 Sept 2026, 15:0732,225-1,569
1 Sept 2026, 12:0533,794+684
31 Aug 2026, 14:1833,110+805
30 Aug 2026, 12:0532,305-49
29 Aug 2026, 12:4832,354-33
28 Aug 2026, 14:3732,387+6
27 Aug 2026, 17:3732,381-5
26 Aug 2026, 18:1532,386+254
25 Aug 2026, 18:5332,132+101
24 Aug 2026, 20:3632,031+1,240
23 Aug 2026, 07:0530,791first reading

Engagement

154 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 92 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.73%
avg views ÷ 31,347 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,110
70 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
70
of 154 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held154 (5 August 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total147,628
Reactions total11,158
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,610
Videos
≈365
Links
≈798

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
43m 40s
Average length
2m 05s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

22,547 reactions across 154 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤9,55742.4%
💘8,86439.3%
💅2,90312.9%
🕊8123.60%
🦄2090.927%
💔1690.75%
🤷‍♀330.146%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 154 of the 154 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,547 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 154 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
0.649%
1 of 154 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,330
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,040
over 153 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFH4dji1120 August 202620 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 154 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

28 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC784 views79 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

˚ . ✦ . ꒰ ʚɞ ꒱ ─ ✦ ─꒰ ʚɞ꒱ . ✧ . ˚ ✨ - девочки, проверьте свою косметичку если средство ещё не закончилось – это не значит, что оно свежее😞 примерные сроки после открытия: 📌тушь: 3–6 месяцев 📌жидкая подводка: 3–6 месяцев 📌консилер: 6–12 месяцев 📌тональный крем: около года 📌помада/блеск: 1–2 года 📌сухие тени и пудра: до 2 лет 📌спонж: менять, если плохо отмывается, пахнет или начал крошиться если у средства странны…

💘51❤20💅7🤷‍♀1

28 Sept 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,170 views114 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

⊹ — ⊹ — ⊹ ୨ ⟡ ୧ ⊹ — ⊹ — ⊹ 🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬 🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬 ⭐️ пока ты откладываешь, кто-то уже делает ⭐️работает ⭐️собирает портфолио ⭐️учит язык ⭐️тренируется ⭐️хорошо учится ⭐️становится лучше не жди идеального дня или настроения, результат приходит к тем, кто начал ⭐️ зависимая от внешности

💅66❤37💘11

27 Sept 2026, 16:03 UTC≈1,760 views142 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

. + ˚ ♡ ₊ ° . † ₊ ‧ + ˚ ♡ ‧ + ˚ ❤️ — что сделать, если хочется перемен, но непонятно с чего начать 1️⃣ поменяй заставку на телефоне 2️⃣ наведи порядок вокруг себя 3️⃣ составь список “чего я хочу в ближайшие 3 месяца” 4️⃣ начни изучать одну новую тему каждую неделю, например культуру другой страны или психологию 5️⃣ найди новый аромат или уходовый ритуал, который будет наполнять тебя 6️⃣ выбери одну …

❤113💘18💅11

27 Sept 2026, 11:09 UTC≈1,900 views172 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

૮꒰ 。っ -。꒱ఎ ° ˖ ★ ◠ ᅠ. ° · ★ ◠ ᅠ. 🤩 — что прокачать за месяц, чтобы стать интереснее 🟤выучить 50 новых слов на английском 🟤прочитать одну книгу 🟤посмотреть пару видео про стиль или уход 🟤разобраться в базовой финансовой грамотности 🟤начать вести заметки с идеями и целями 🟤попробовать новое хобби 🟤научиться говорить о себе увереннее выбери каждый месяц добавлять себе новые знания, навыки и уверенность, …

💘121💅27❤24

27 Sept 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,910 views146 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

˚ . ✦ . ꒰ ʚɞ ꒱ ─ ✦ ─꒰ ʚɞ꒱ . ✧ . ˚ 🧇 – идеи уютных завтраков 🍂 иногда лучший способ настроиться на день – не заставлять себя “собраться”, а начать с чего-то тёплого, простого и приятного 🍂 зависимая от внешности

❤106💅22💘12💔6

26 Sept 2026, 16:08 UTC≈2,120 views114 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Video

⊹ — ⊹ — ⊹ ୨ ⟡ ୧ ⊹ — ⊹ — ⊹ 🤩 – подробный туториал на тот самый Pinterest пучок зависимая от внешности

❤81💅16💘16🦄1

26 Sept 2026, 11:12 UTC≈2,200 views171 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

. + ˚ ♡ ₊ ° . † ₊ ‧ + ˚ ♡ ‧ + ˚ 🤎 — базовые правила, о которых легко забыть 🍂 меньше рассказывай о планах – больше делай 🍂 читай, учись, интересуйся новым 🍂 убирай телефон, когда хочется прожить момент нормально 🍂 не бойся хотеть большего, даже если пока не знаешь как 🍂 спокойно отпускай людей, рядом с которыми ты больше не растёшь 🍂 помни: первые результаты появляются только после первых действий …

❤130💘27💅14

26 Sept 2026, 07:01 UTC≈2,230 views272 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

⟡ · ⊹ . ° ୨୧ ◌ ゚ . ⊹ ⟡ 🩷🩷🩷 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷из сумки прямо сегодня⬇️ ⏺️старые чеки ⏺️фантики и бумажки ⏺️косметику, которой ты не пользуешься ⏺️пустые упаковки от жвачки/салфеток ⏺️лишние ручки без чернил ⏺️крошки на дне сумки ⏺️всё, что лежит там “на всякий случай” больше трех месяцев а потом положи обратно только нужное: ключи, салфетки, бальзам, зеркало, резинку, наушники и мини-набор гигиены ⏺️ …

💅180💘65❤17💔7🦄3

25 Sept 2026, 16:06 UTC≈2,220 views151 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

⊹ — ⊹ — ⊹ ୨ ⟡ ୧ ⊹ — ⊹ — ⊹ 🤍- советы по похудению без вреда для себя 🤍не садиться на жёсткие диеты - они срывают и забирают силы 🤍убрать не еду, а постоянные перекусы «просто так» 🤍пить воду - часто мы путаем голод с жаждой 🤍добавить движение не через спортзал, а через прогулки, танцы, зарядку 🤍не запрещать сладкое, а выбирать то, что реально нравится, и есть медленно 🤍помнить: похудение - не про наказа…

❤120💘24💅7

25 Sept 2026, 11:21 UTC≈2,120 views129 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

☆₊˚. — ‧ — ‧ ˗ˏˋ ★ ´ˎ˗ ‧ — ‧ — .˚₊☆ 👚 - лайфхаки для красивой носки оверсайз свитеров зависимая от внешности

💘85❤30💅7🦄7

25 Sept 2026, 07:18 UTC≈2,210 views148 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

. + ˚ ♡ ₊ ° . † ₊ ‧ + ˚ ♡ ‧ + ˚ 💗 — темы для саморазвития, если не знаешь, с чего начать 🤫 изучай так, как удобно: видео на YouTube/TikTok, статьи, книги, подкасты и полезные посты📎 ⚪️английский: слова, фразы, произношение, фильмы в оригинале 🟤финансовая грамотность: как копить, тратить и планировать деньги ⚪️красивая речь: слова-паразиты, уверенные фразы, умение объяснять мысли 🟤уход за собой: кож…

💘108❤28💅10🦄2

24 Sept 2026, 16:30 UTC≈2,320 views244 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

˚ . ✦ . ꒰ ʚɞ ꒱ ─ ✦ ─꒰ ʚɞ꒱ . ✧ . ˚ 🫶 — какими фразами поддержать подругу, если ей тяжело 🍓 «я рядом, рассказывай» 🍓 «тебе сейчас правда тяжело, я понимаю» 🍓 «хочешь совет или просто чтобы я выслушала?» 🍓 «давай подумаем, что можно сделать первым» 🍓 «ты не обязана сейчас быть сильной» 🍓 «я могу тебе чем-то помочь?» 🍓 «пойдём прогуляемся / выпьем чай / просто посидим» ✍️🤍 поддержка – это не всегда решить проблему за ч…

💅131❤86💘27

Showing the 12 most recent of 154 posts we hold for @miller_girlss_vonenism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Aug 2026, 10:22 UTCAnonymous Poll237 voters

Какую из этих картин по номерам вы бы хотели нарисовать? Можно голосовать за несколько вариантов

  1. 114%
  2. 224%
  3. 330%
  4. 429%
  5. 537%
  6. 618%
  7. 734%
  8. 843%
  9. 927%

The shares total 256%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 154 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Она 10/10
@sheis10l10 · 59,091
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 August 2026
Красотка
@kpac0mka · 45,453
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 26 August 2026
cozy channel ⟡ учёба
@cozyy_channel · 52,340
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 23 August 2026
Бьюти с Полиной
@beauty_with_Polina · 42,053
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 28 August 2026
девочка кайф ♡ красота
@mmlogiya · 49,200
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 25 August 2026
эстетика
@estetika_x · 56,504
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
Твой путь к цели
@aeshetic_insane · 54,427
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
Polly Pie 🎀
@pollypie_yt · 45,368
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“зависимая от внешности” (@miller_girlss_vonenism), 31,347 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miller_girlss_vonenism.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.