这么大的雨,怎么你们开车都不开雾灯啊?🤨示廓灯总得开吧?
Signed Benny 小可爱

Channel
@mikuri520
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12,216subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001120455085 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mikuri520 |
| Description | 周末晒猫猫。 |
| Created | 6 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mikuri520 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 12,216 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 12,220 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 12,221 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 12,223 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 12,224 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:10 | 12,228 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 12,229 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (4 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 30,650 |
| Reactions total | 116 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
227 reactions across 16 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😢 | 68 | 30.0% | |
| 😁 | 66 | 29.1% | |
| 🤡 | 26 | 11.5% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 11.0% | |
| 👌 | 9 | 3.96% | |
| 😇 | 7 | 3.08% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 2.64% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 1.32% | |
| 😨 | 3 | 1.32% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 1.32% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.32% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.881% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.441% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.441% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.441% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.441% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.441% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.441% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 227reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
这么大的雨,怎么你们开车都不开雾灯啊?🤨示廓灯总得开吧?
Signed Benny 小可爱
看多了车祸警示录,此时的我屁股已经抬起来,准备要跑了
😁22😇7
Signed Benny 小可爱
今天是认识小妹妹四周年的纪念日。本来在几个月前还和她说,要在66天后请她吃神秘大餐,并且卖关子没告诉她原因。 只是,在回到福建之后她整个人都变得不爱搭理人,然后几天前告诉我说家里介绍了相亲对象,觉得我们不适合继续聊天。 我说我明白了,谢谢你把真实的想法告诉我。然后过了几天,把送给她的周大福项链手链要了回来。 她:那项链那些还是我说不要你要送我的呢,并不是我讨要来的,你现在要回去,我当然是会还给你的。那其实可以不送的 我:我没有觉得是你讨要的,因为当时是我真心想送你的,没有后悔过,这一点我不会否认。 其实我能明显感觉到她有一点被刺到、自尊和防御起来了。 拿到首饰后,我和她说项链送给她是真心的,不是讨要的;我们对这段关系有着不同的理解和错位 随后简单的几句话后,她在全平台拉黑了我。姑娘还是生气了,哎 我们拥有过的快乐大部分都是真的,那些快乐意味着什么,我们从来没有真正达成一致。 很遗憾这部剧,在第二季被砍直接大结局了…
😢36🥰3🌭1🔥1🤗1😭1
Signed Benny 小可爱
做了个梦,梦见所有人都背叛了我,好像是大学同学,只有一两个人选择相信我
😢10🤔1
Signed Benny 小可爱
上次离开中国大陆已经是半年前了,想想下半年去哪里玩比较好呢🤔
Signed Benny 小可爱
いけちゃん 瞬间变身精神小妹
❤16
Signed Benny 小可爱
好久没跑内环高架和南北停车场了啊🤡
🤡7
Signed Benny 小可爱
热知识:现在上海比新加坡热!
🤡5🔥2
Signed Benny 小可爱
哈哈哈哈 这合理吗
Signed Benny 小可爱
+1317行,就问你怕不怕,反正我不怕,看都不看直接commit
🤡3
Signed Benny 小可爱
杜叔叔的 t.me 没了
🤡6😨3🍾1
Signed Benny 小可爱
我勒个去 elm 竟然还活着并且要发1.0了 铁树开花了…
🤡1
Signed Benny 小可爱
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @mikuri520. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 333,585 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BennyThink's Blog” (@mikuri520), 12,216 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mikuri520.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.