я ещё урвала вещички на озоне по дешевке ещё к этому косплею, ждите к фанфану

Channel
.. беспечная микиума
@mikiuuma
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
141subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002735339383 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mikiuuma |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mikiuuma |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 141 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 140 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 80.5%
- avg views ÷ 141 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 114
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.17%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (30 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,476 |
| Reactions total | 38 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 15s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
38 reactions across 5 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5332767944608884376 | 8 | 21.1% | |
| custom 5902350753464327015 | 5 | 13.2% | |
| custom 5298645958450510100 | 4 | 10.5% | |
| custom 5352727529511723136 | 4 | 10.5% | |
| custom 5395435464532469524 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| custom 5465589786762843931 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| custom 5472100553456633654 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| custom 5368482410151295168 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| custom 5449381748418849650 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| custom 5296571076929673776 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| custom 5352792306208480366 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| custom 5352808511120087555 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| custom 5352870513267973607 | 1 | 2.63% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
привет
УРААА 140 ПОДПИСЧИКОВ СПАСИБО ВАМ ОГРОМНОЕ
☺️зирафаэль 🤩 и ♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️ 😈 🦴🦴🦴 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 — ☺️ жду должных.. извинений. — ☺️ет. — ☺️ реверансом... — ☺️ез танцев. — ☺️ танцевал, я был не прав, в 1650, в 1793, в 1941! — ...☺️АДНО! 😀😀😀😀😀 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 my crowley
custom 54721005534566336543custom 54493817484188496502
🌟👻😇🥰🔤🔤🔤🔤✍️🍡🎈 .[💛] — 🪽Yo, good luck, man. I'm proud of you. But don't let this get to your head, buddy. 🪽You're still not the biggest bird. 🥹🥹🥹⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐🥹🥹 ''🚇• "VICTORY OR DEATH"🌟 #cosplay 😒..
всем удачи по заявкам на фанфан, а я буду кайфовать в виде участника так как я малышочек 🌟
ШУТКА!!! вы думали что, мой др будет? НЕТ! будет день рождения джамиля и намджуна из бтс
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🤩 ♥️♥️♥️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ☺️ так, скоро (ладно не скоро, через 40 дней) у джамиля 12 сентября день рождения, поэтому я открываю вишлист, чтобы порадовать змейку! скажу лишь одно, что вы не обязаны мне что-то дарить и я ни в коем случае не заставляю, но если есть желание, то я с радостью с головы до ног оближу от вас подарок, и барабанная дробь, вишлист для джамиляяя... здесь! 💤💤 https://followish.…
custom 53327679446088843763custom 53954354645324695243custom 54655897867628439313
ну что, выкладывать вишлист на мой др?
🐠🐠🤰👽🐇👽🤩🤩🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 🥹🥹 🥹🥹 💜💜💜💜💜 I don’t believe, you're a liar. Naui eodumgwa neoui eodum-i gyeobchyeojilttae Geudaelo naege matgyeo Ruler of my heart ruler of my heart ruler of my heart Geudaelo naege matgyeo Ruler of my heart ruler of my heart ruler of my heart.. 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🗓🗓🗓 🗓🗓🗓 my favorite sua photo
custom 53327679446088843765custom 52986459584505101004
очень жду от кого-нибудь хумки телеграмма и впна, я очень вдохновилась этой идеей и строю хедканоны по ним🤩🤩🤩
custom 59023507534643270152
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️ ♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️ 🗝🗝🗝 🗝🗝🗝 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 — с̠л̠о̠в̠о̠ «пожаловаться» заблокировано в моем словаре. у меня есть только «поставить лайк» и «подписаться». 🙂 — алгоритм? да я сам пишу этот а̷л̷г̷о̷р̷и̷т̷м̷! просто пока что он д̷у̷м̷а̷е̷т̷, что это его идея. я гений, правда? 👛 🕹🕹🕹🕹🕹🕹
custom 53527275295117231364custom 59023507534643270153custom 53684824101512951682custom 52965710769296737761custom 53527923062084803661custom 53528085111200875551custom 53528705132679736071
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @mikiuuma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 637,490 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“.. беспечная микиума” (@mikiuuma), 141 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mikiuuma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.