Channel
@miki_008
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,578subscribers
-47 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001839523715 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @miki_008 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miki_008 |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 21:40 | 2,578 | -6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 2,584 | -11 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 2,595 | -9 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 05:17 | 2,604 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:13 | 2,608 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:26 | 2,617 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 2,624 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 2,625 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 August 2026 – 25 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,667 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
«я чувствую, что у тебя что-то не так» даже если мы не знаем обо всём, что происходит в жизни друг друга, мы всё равно чувствуем боль, которую чувствует близкий человек. порой даже сильнее чем тот, кто изначально её переживает. как прекрасно родство душ, когда один обессилено падает, другой подставляет плечо, напоминая главную цель. «если сходятся пути, сходятся и сердца».
Photo, posted without a caption
в любых отношениях должны участвовать только двое. звонить и писать должны оба. делать шаги к примирению должны ОБА. отношения - это когда два человека.
- звонил? - да - что-то важное? - я очень сильно люблю тебя
Photo, posted without a caption
Теория 90/10. Ты встречаешься с кем-то, кто соответствует 90% твоих требований, но ты сильно зацикливаешься на остальных 10%. Ты начинаешь искать эти 10% где-то ещё и встречаешь того, у кого они есть. Ты делаешь решительный шаг и идешь к этому человеку. Однако вскоре ты обнаруживаешь, что новому партнеру не хватает 90% того, что было у вашего прежнего партнера. Вы потеряли 90%, чтобы получить 10%.
«женщина – это отражение мужчины. если любить ее до безумства, она станет той, о которой ты мечтал»
Photo, posted without a caption
на заметку. живи спокойно и не думай что кто-то про тебя забыл, близкие не забывают, а кто забыл, тот не был им.
я не держу зла, но я все ещё помню, как шла домой в слезах и молила Бога, чтобы он избавил меня от чувств к тебе.
Photo, posted without a caption
«я не знаю, что именно я любил в ней, но почему-то мне хотелось поделиться всем, что на душе, именно с ней. почему-то хотелось стараться, несмотря ни на что. да, меня дико бесили её обиды и постоянная недосказанность, но что я мог поделать? если тянуло — тянуло дико. я засыпал и просыпался с мыслями о ней, и даже в самой шумной компании не хватало её улыбки и до боли родного смеха. хотелось говорить с ней обо всём на…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @miki_008. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“miki” (@miki_008), 2,578 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miki_008.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.