4 Aug 2026, 10:22 UTC177 viewsread 7 August 2026
زنده باد تمامِ نرسیدنهایی که بعدها فهمیدم خودِ «معجزه» بودند!
Channel
minde🙇🏻🗯
@miinde
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,711subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001001908384 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @miinde |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miinde |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 1,711 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:06 | 1,712 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 1,712 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 17.8%
- avg views ÷ 1,711 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 304
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 August 2025 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 608 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
17 Jul 2026, 08:46 UTC431 viewsread 7 August 2026
File
یه دقیقه دیگه تو این شهر معلوم نیست کی زنده است کی مرده...
Signed Ashkan_pks
16 Jul 2026, 19:53 UTC450 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @zhaveee
آرام بودن و مشاهده گر بودن را بياموزيم، هرچيزى به واكنش ما نياز ندارد.
27 Jun 2026, 20:51 UTC762 viewsread 7 August 2026
و تو عزیز من، هنگامی که به جای ریشه یک فرد عاشق گل و شکوفههایش میشوی، در پاییز چه خواهی کرد؟
9 Jun 2026, 09:13 UTC908 viewsread 7 August 2026
File
File, posted without a caption
22 Nov 2025, 15:36 UTC≈1,790 viewsread 7 August 2026
توی روانشناسی یه اصطلاح داریم به اسم خطای نسبت دادن بنیادین یعنی چی حالا؟ ما اگه پیاده باشیم، راننده ها همه وحشین. ولی اگه ما سواره باشیم، پیاده ها همه گیجن. ما اگه تند رانندگی کنیم چون عجله داریم. ولی اگه بقیه تند برن خیلی گاون! یا مثلاً توی رابطه، اگه من خودم پیام ندم کار داشتم ولی اگه طرف مقابل پیام نده یعنی داره خیانت میکنه! مغز ما عاشق اینه که خودشو منطقی بدونه و بقیه رو مقصر بشناسه. برای درک بهتر دیگران، بای…
21 Nov 2025, 18:05 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 7 August 2026
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DRU9_1LDLRy/?igsh=OTJyMDY3b253b2pz
18 Nov 2025, 16:34 UTC884 viewsread 7 August 2026
خواهش میکنم هر کس رو دیدید بهش روحیه بدید، بگید اوضاع درست میشه، خاطره با مزه بگید به هم، با هم حرف بزنید. به دوستاتون زنگ بزنید بیدلیل بهشون چرت و پرت بگید، به هم کادو بدید، همدیگه رو خوشحال کنید. تا اطلاع ثانوی با عشقتون به هم نزنید. واقعا احتیاج داریم افسرده نباشیم، همهمون با هم ♥️ @MIINDE
16 Nov 2025, 09:25 UTC981 viewsread 7 August 2026
اونی كه هميشه اميدوار كننده ترين حرفارو بهتون ميزنه تموم راه ها رو رفته و از همه نااميد تره ولی دوست نداره شما نااميد بشی ؛ قدرشو بدونيد... @MIINDE
1 Nov 2025, 09:18 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 7 August 2026
به ازای هرکسی که فکر می کنه تو خیلی ساکتی، یک نفر هست که فکر می کنه تو شنونده خوبی هستی. به ازای هرکسی که فکر می کنه تو وابستهای، یک نفر هست که فکر می کنه چقدر خوبه که تو اینقدر به دیگران اهمیت می دی. به ازای هرکسی که فکر می کنه تو چقدر عجیبی، یه نفر هست که فکر می کنه تو چقدر شجاعی که خودت هستی و خاصی. به ازای هرکسی که فکر می کنه تو خیلی حساسی، یه نفر هست که بهت احترام می ذاره که برای احساساتت ارزش قائلی. چیزی که مم…
5 Oct 2025, 18:14 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 7 August 2026
قوی نباشین. تا مرز از پا افتادن پیش میرین ولی از کسی کمک نمی گیرین دیگران هم نه رعایت حالتون رو می کنن نه کمکتون. چرا؟ چون شما قوی هستین. برعکس بگین خستهام نمیتونم. میشه کمکم کنین؟ باورکنین طبیعیه که آدم ها کم بیارن اگه اعلام کنین، بهتون کمک میشه و حالتون هم بهتر میشه. خیلی قوی بودن خوب نیست. @MIINDE
4 Oct 2025, 16:05 UTC≈1,180 viewsread 7 August 2026
برای ازدواج فقط دوست داشتن ملاک نیست ! باید خانواده دار باشه باید عرضه داشته باشه باید شعور داشته باشه باید خاکی و اصیل باشه باید دست و دلباز باشه باید چشم و دل سیر باشه باید هدفمندو کاری باشه باید هَوَل نباشه باید شوخ طبع باشه باید بالغ باشه باید متعهد باشه باید ظاهر درست و مرتب داشته باشه @MIINDE
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @miinde. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,057,416 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@miinde named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@tarinwearr
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“minde🙇🏻🗯” (@miinde), 1,711 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miinde.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.