International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 11 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 7 of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 36 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 11, the earliest publisher we hold is @C_Military1. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 10 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
1 more channel is in this same group but not listed individually here.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net -170. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,222–7,448 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 18:21
7,248
-16
13 Sept 2026, 00:01
7,264
-15
8 Sept 2026, 15:15
7,279
-26
3 Sept 2026, 06:07
7,305
-18
30 Aug 2026, 17:04
7,323
-20
27 Aug 2026, 11:58
7,343
-10
24 Aug 2026, 02:39
7,353
-4
20 Aug 2026, 16:52
7,357
-5
17 Aug 2026, 22:55
7,362
-17
14 Aug 2026, 12:36
7,379
-25
10 Aug 2026, 18:31
7,404
-18
8 Aug 2026, 04:09
7,422
+4
7 Aug 2026, 12:00
7,418
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:54
7,418
first reading
Engagement
277 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 277 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
11m 26s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
70 reactions across 48 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
52
74.3%
😢
7
10.0%
🤬
5
7.14%
😁
3
4.29%
😱
2
2.86%
🔥
1
1.43%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 277 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 277 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#إعلام_العدو
وسائل إعلام إسرائيلية: إضراب في مطار بن غوريون: تم تعليق عمليات الهبوط في المطار حاليًا حتى الساعة 20:00.
#الإعلام_الحربي
#شباب_محور_المقاومة
تنبيه عاجل |بيان كتلة الوفاء للمقاومة 20-08-2026:
عقدت كتلة الوفاء للمقاومة جلستها الدورية بتاريخ 20/8/2026 حول عدد من الأمور السياسية والنيابية وشؤون تتصل بلبنان وفلسطين والمنطقة وتم إصدار البيان التالي:
يمر أربعون يوماً على مواراة قائد الأمة الإسلامية الولي الفقيه القائد الشهيد السيد علي الحسيني الخامنائي ثرى الرحمة، وتتجدد مشاعر الفقد والوفاء لهذا القائد التاريخي الفذ والعهد والولاء لخلفه الصالح القائد السيد مجتبى…
🔴هيئة عمليات التجارة البحرية البريطانية: تلقينا بلاغاً عن حادث وقع على بعد 136 ميلًا بحريًا شرق مدينة المكلا في اليمن.
وأفادت ناقلة عبر نداء استغاثة على قناة VHF 16 بأنها تعرضت لاقتراب سفينة غير مصرح بها أثناء إبحارها غربًا في خليج عدن.
#شباب_محور_المقاومة
🔴نيويورك تايمز: حرب ترامب الفاشلة مع إيران فشل عسكري وخطأ استراتيجي كارثي أقرب إلى المهزلة
لا توجد خطة واضحة لإنهاء الصراع بل مجرد جهود عقيمة لرئيس يائس للتخلص من مرارة الهزيمة
جوهر المفاوضات الزائفة والضربات الصاروخية المتواصلة هو محاولة لإنهاء الحرب من دون خسارتها
#شباب_محور_المقاومة
Showing the 12 most recent of 277 posts we hold for @mihwar_almuqawama. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
الكورنيت الكتائبي @altaifaalmansoora · 21,952 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
فاء - FAA @faairaq · 106,685 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026
شهد الياسري - Shahd Al Yasiri @Shahadyasiri · 223,694 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
سرايا اولياء الدم @awlialdm · 41,606 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
سومر نيوز @SumerNews2 · 30,267 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 6 September 2026
توثية الشيعة @TuthiatAlshiyea · 31,407 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
ميل - Mil @Miliqnews · 36,536 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026
كاف - Kaf @centerkaf · 41,923 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
تغريدة الحشد @Tweet92 · 89,240 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 August 2026
مركز خاتم الأنبياء للإعلام المقاوم @khataam313 · 25,308 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
Sonia @S0nia10 · 261,097 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
نايا - NAYA @naya_foriraq · 266,953 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
المعلومة الاخبارية @almaalomah · 27,860 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 September 2026
أولاد الشايب 313 _'awlad alshayb @aliaarru · 21,871 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026
ابو تراب التميمي @AboTorbAtamime · 109,524 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
جمهورية حناطة @Hanata_Republic · 48,583 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
شعجب نيوز - Shajab news @shajab_news · 37,173 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
العصفورة @Al_3sforh · 100,312 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
العميد @LAmad313 · 101,526 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شباب محور المقاومة” (@mihwar_almuqawama), 7,248 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mihwar_almuqawama.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
