Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Miguel Ruiz Calvo

Channel

Miguel Ruiz Calvo

@miguelruizcalvo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

59,930subscribers

-801 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001990831808
TypeChannel
Username@miguelruizcalvo
DescriptionCanal de Miguel Ruiz Calvo y amigos de YouTube
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/miguelruizcalvo

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

59,93060,73160,330.56 August 2026 — 60,731 subscribers6 August 2026 — 60,707 subscribers7 August 2026 — 60,689 subscribers8 August 2026 — 60,670 subscribers9 August 2026 — 60,651 subscribers10 August 2026 — 60,624 subscribers11 August 2026 — 60,608 subscribers12 August 2026 — 60,592 subscribers14 August 2026 — 60,558 subscribers15 August 2026 — 60,531 subscribers16 August 2026 — 60,492 subscribers17 August 2026 — 60,461 subscribers18 August 2026 — 60,437 subscribers19 August 2026 — 60,413 subscribers20 August 2026 — 60,395 subscribers22 August 2026 — 60,371 subscribers23 August 2026 — 60,344 subscribers25 August 2026 — 60,320 subscribers26 August 2026 — 60,300 subscribers27 August 2026 — 60,281 subscribers28 August 2026 — 60,266 subscribers29 August 2026 — 60,254 subscribers30 August 2026 — 60,246 subscribers31 August 2026 — 60,224 subscribers1 September 2026 — 60,203 subscribers2 September 2026 — 60,181 subscribers3 September 2026 — 60,152 subscribers5 September 2026 — 60,115 subscribers9 September 2026 — 60,072 subscribers11 September 2026 — 60,008 subscribers13 September 2026 — 59,979 subscribers15 September 2026 — 59,963 subscribers17 September 2026 — 59,930 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -801. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 59,810–60,851 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 08:1759,930-33
15 Sept 2026, 06:0159,963-16
13 Sept 2026, 14:2159,979-29
11 Sept 2026, 18:0060,008-64
9 Sept 2026, 02:1960,072-43
5 Sept 2026, 19:3760,115-37
3 Sept 2026, 14:5760,152-29
2 Sept 2026, 07:2760,181-22
1 Sept 2026, 09:1460,203-21
31 Aug 2026, 06:3460,224-22
30 Aug 2026, 08:3760,246-8
29 Aug 2026, 09:5860,254-12
28 Aug 2026, 10:2760,266-15
27 Aug 2026, 07:5960,281-19
26 Aug 2026, 07:2460,300-20
25 Aug 2026, 04:1360,320-24
23 Aug 2026, 22:5560,344-27
22 Aug 2026, 08:0660,371-24
20 Aug 2026, 20:3460,395-18
19 Aug 2026, 19:2260,413first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.3%
avg views ÷ 59,930 subscribers
Avg views / post
23,600
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 September 2026
Posts held32 (5 July 202616 September 2026)
Views total212,200
Reactions total16,728
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 15:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
198
Videos
187
Links
52

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10m 56s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

66,554 reactions across 32 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍27,05640.7%
23,35135.1%
🔥3,6335.46%
👏3,4835.23%
😁3,3605.05%
🎉2,3173.48%
🤬9331.40%
🤡7291.10%
😱5060.76%
😢3400.511%
💩2590.389%
🤔2470.371%
🤮1920.288%
🤯760.114%
👎720.108%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66,554 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 16 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Sept 2026, 22:20 UTC≈15,400 views1,949 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

🚨 BRUTAL IRÁN 🚨 Tras 200 noches, miles de iraníes siguen en las calles en defensa de la soberanía e independencia de su país frente a la agresión estadounidense-israelí. Trump, con sus despiadados crímenes contra el pueblo iraní, ha unido más que nunca a los iraníes en torno a la revolución islámica. Como dijo Ruhollah Jomeini: «La sangre de los mártires fortalece la revolución».

👍1,070593👏161🎉75🔥38👎5🤡4🤔3

16 Sept 2026, 14:35 UTC≈16,800 views1,987 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

🚨🚨¡BRUTAL ATAQUE DE YEMEN!🚨🚨 Se confirma que las defensas aéreas yemeníes derribaron anoche un avión de combate F-15 saudí de origen estadounidense. Se han publicado imágenes del avión derribado (he acortado el vídeo y he dejado los momentos destacados) ¡Bin Salman y Trump humillados una vez más!

🎉937👍501🔥205192👏121😁12😱11🤔6

13 Sept 2026, 19:34 UTC≈23,100 views1,648 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

🚨🚨BRUTAL HUMILLACIÓN A TRUMP DESDE IRÁN (una más) 💥😢Bloomberg: "En una gasolinera de San Diego donde el diésel se vende a 9,99 dólares el galón, los californianos pueden consolarse al menos con esto: en teoría, los precios no pueden subir más". ☝️El meme-reacción de GHALIBAF a esta noticia de Bloomberg se volvió tendencia 🔝

😁1,150👍23288🔥80🎉35🤡34👏14😱9

13 Sept 2026, 15:07 UTC≈22,600 views2,135 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

🚨🚨Ansar Allah se moviliza junto con los grupos tribales para expulsar a los mercenarios saudíes y emiratíes de la tierra yemení que ocupan. Con Toyotas, drones, misiles... y con pelotas como camiones, los yemeníes están venciendo a ejércitos entrenados por el Pentágono, armados con la última tecnología y financiados con miles de millones de dólares. Increíble....

👍1,210520👏219🔥99🎉60😱14🤔6😁4

10 Sept 2026, 14:48 UTC≈27,500 views2,399 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

⚠🇾🇪Los hutíes ya desfilan🎶 por Al-Moja, una ciudad del suroeste de Yemen que acaba de ser liberada de los mercenarios saudíes. Cabe destacar que son recibidos cordialmente por los habitantes locales. Es interesante este hecho, ya que los medios de desinformación nos querían hacer creer falsamente que nadie en Yemen apreciaba a los hutíes 🇾🇪🇵🇸

👍1,380540🎉226👏176🔥59🤔11😁3💩2

10 Sept 2026, 12:43 UTC≈25,800 views1,535 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

🚨🚨LA VERDAD SOBRE CEUTA SALE A LA LUZ: FUE UN ATAQUE🚨🚨 El expresidente del Gobierno español, José María Aznar, el «carnicero de Irak», ha confesado hoy torpemente que, si no se hubiesen roto relaciones con Israel, no habría ocurrido lo de Ceuta. 💭¿Qué quiere decir Aznar? ¿Que Israel está detrás de lo ocurrido en Ceuta? 💭 💭¿Nos ha atacado Israel (EEUU) por condenar sus crímenes en Gaza? 💭 💭¿Nos exponemos a más ata

👍1,030🤬256103👏53🤔22🔥19💩18🤡15

9 Sept 2026, 23:30 UTC≈21,800 views1,634 reactionsread 23 September 2026

⚠️⚠️Precisamente lo habíamos comentado en el directo: cuando las fuerzas de un bando empiezan a huir en desbandada, se produce un efecto muy peligroso, ya que todo el frente puede derrumbarse rápidamente. Parece que eso es lo que les está pasando a los mercenarios saudíes. Los saudíes están intentando controlar la huida de sus tropas mercenarias. Veremos si lo consiguen. 🫡Para los hutíes de Yemen, es importante apr

👍1,080🎉209153🔥108👏63😱9😁5🤔3

9 Sept 2026, 23:12 UTC≈23,200 views1,305 reactionsread 23 September 2026

⚠️🇾🇪Parece que esta noche los hutíes de Yemen están pateando unos cuantos traseros saudíes 😁

686👍351🔥120👏77🎉35😁28🤔4🤡2

6 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC≈36,000 views2,136 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

⚠🇾🇪❌🇸🇦Ansarullah (hutíes) acaba de publicar imágenes de un ataque preciso de sus fuerzas militares contra una reunión de comandantes de mercenarios saudíes (Consejo Político Local), que en ese momento se encontraban cerca de tres vehículos blindados. No quedó nada. Ni uno sobrevivió.

👍1,230🎉272🔥232215😱81👏66🤯19🤔15

21 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC≈51,900 views2,386 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

🚨BRUTAL ATAQUE DE YEMEN. EEUU Y ARABIA HUMILLADOS🚨 🤯Desde Yemen (huthis) se ha publicado un vídeo de 10 minutos que ha sorprendido a todo el mundo. En el vídeo se recopilan ataques de drones yemeníes contra las tropas saudíes. Los drones lanzan sin parar granadas desde cientos de metros de altura con una precisión extrema. Esta precisión en el lanzamiento de las granadas es lo que más ha sorprendido a los expertos

1,190👍735🔥216👏136🎉45😱32😁15🤔6

21 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC≈46,200 views1,976 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

⚠ 🇾🇪🔥🇸🇦 Los hutíes acaban publicar un vídeo de 10 minutos recopilando sus últimos ataques contra las tropas saudíes grabados a máxima definición. Adjunto algunas capturas del vídeo, ya que es muy largo y quizás al espectador le sea tedioso de ver entero (me preocupo por vosotros🔥).

👍1,300🔥237217👏115🎉47😁34😱9🤔6

9 Aug 2026, 19:59 UTC≈55,900 views2,188 reactionsread 23 September 2026

🚨🚨ALERTA! Familia, no creo que pueda hacer directo hoy por la noche. No obstante, si me da tiempo, empezaríamos más tarde! Abrazos!!

👍1,690😢187180🤔57🔥28😱17🤯9💩8

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @miguelruizcalvo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Miguel Ruiz Calvo” (@miguelruizcalvo), 59,930 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miguelruizcalvo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.