Channel
@migratorg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,163subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001417673557 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @migratorg |
| Created | 18 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/migratorg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 2,163 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:22 | 2,166 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:50 | 2,173 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:19 | 2,174 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (9 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,181 |
| Reactions total | 25 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
28 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15 | 53.6% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 32.1% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 10.7% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Supabase asked 2,000 founders what is hard now - technical complexity collapsed The biggest single shift in the survey: technical complexity as the top challenge fell from 24% to 11% in a year. Free to read, ten chapters. - customer acquisition now leads at 32%, then product-market fit 14% and fundraising 13% - burnout appears as a new option and immediately ties technical complexity at 11% - 61% of startups have m…
👍2
105 YC founders now work at OpenAI or Anthropic - 60% under one title Startups.RIP tracked every YC founder whose startup was acquired or shut down and who then joined one of the two labs. 70 landed at OpenAI, 35 at Anthropic. - 63 of them, 60% of all roles, carry the same title: Member of Technical Staff - sortable table plus a ribbon chart tracing each path from founding year to lab - free, no signup, built on a …
👍2
Exponential View priced real AI demand - $175B, and still 0.42% of GDP The team modelled 1,000+ firms bottom-up and deduplicated revenue, so the same dollar is not counted again at the app, model and infra layers. 66 pages, free. - $175B annualized run rate, up from $110B trailing twelve months: 35% QoQ, 3.2x annually - growing roughly 3x faster than any previous IT wave - still a rounding error against the economy…
👍2
Exabase Link Preview - free Open Graph data for 20,000 URLs a month Anything that renders a link card ends up rebuilding the same scraper: headless browser, proxy rotation, special cases for YouTube and Amazon. This is that scraper behind a single GET request. - returns title, description, og:image, favicon with dimensions, canonical URL, site name and locale as structured JSON - renders JavaScript pages on their s…
❤1
DocsAlot - docs that stay in sync and ship agent-readable Half your support load is now agents reading last quarter's documentation. DocsAlot spots pages that drifted from the source, drafts the fix and waits for approval before publishing. - emits llms.txt, skill.md and a hosted MCP server, so buyers get agent access without building the infrastructure - API docs generated from OpenAPI specs with an interactive pl…
❤1
Badge sends AI agents to collect anonymous peer reviews from people you actually worked with, then turns them into a portable Trust Score. Resumes and LinkedIn profiles now take minutes to generate, so recruiters can't read signal off paper. Badge verifies reviewers by work email, keeps reviews anonymous so they stay honest, and has agents ask targeted follow-ups instead of accepting a generic "great teammate". A r…
AnySearch is a search API built for agents, not people: it queries trusted sources in parallel, strips SEO spam and ads, and hands back clean structured JSON. People skim links and decide what to trust. Agents don't - they build on whatever HTML they get, so stale or messy results mean repeated calls and confident nonsense downstream. Ships as an MCP server, a Skill, or a plain API, with a free tier. Worth a look i…
❤1
Fresh Q1 2026 Venture Beacon from Fenwick and Carta, built on live Carta data. — AI companies are taking a growing share of all VC — fewer down rounds, especially at later stages — valuations trending up across every stage — fundraising activity still recovering https://www.fenwick.com/insights/publication/q1-2026-venture-beacon-key-vc-market-trends
👍1
QApilot's CoWork turns your existing test cases into running mobile automation and claims 3x the coverage from the same QE team. It plans and re-plans tests with AI but keeps a human approval step, runs them on real iOS, Android, and Flutter devices, pauses when a decision needs judgment, and fails out loud instead of hiding a broken test. The "fails transparently, not silently" design is what sets it apart from th…
discode is an EU-built router that puts 100+ models behind one interface and redacts personal data on-device before anything leaves your machine. It auto-routes each prompt across three axes (smarter, faster, or lower-footprint), adds multi-model validation modes like Challenger and Trio, and shows the CO₂, water, and energy cost per request. Made in Vienna. The on-device privacy filter is the sharp part: GDPR-frie…
Humalike gives AI agents the social layer they're missing: 7 APIs so an agent stops interrupting, monopolizing, or misreading a group chat. Behavioral infrastructure for agents in multi-party settings: Turn-Taking, Theory of Mind, Norms, Persona, Social Memory, Social Signals, Social Observability. Model- and stack-agnostic, so it drops onto whatever you already run. Most agent failures in shared chats aren't the m…
Receiptor AI runs the entire receipt workflow on its own and matches receipts to bank transactions at ~99% accuracy. An agentic bookkeeper that pulls receipts from your email and phone, files them into your accounting software or cloud, and pings you only when it actually needs context. You reach it from the app, WhatsApp, or straight inside Claude and ChatGPT. The "asks only when it's stuck" part is what makes han…
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @migratorg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 375,084 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DI: Digital Immigrant” (@migratorg), 2,163 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/migratorg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.