Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
🔒 || м郃у ƒℓσσ∂ `ʍ⁰⁶ | ιηƒσ ᥫ᭡
@miffyfloodinfo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
42subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003811942045 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @miffyfloodinfo |
| Description | для удобства: @miffyfloodinfo флуд по к-поп,дорамам и лакорнам начало: 23.06.2026 owner: @young_lixxie co-owner: @WolfChan_143 анон-чат: @Miffyflood_anonbot набор закрыт |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miffyfloodinfo |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 42 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 42 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 132.1%
- avg views ÷ 42 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 55.5
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.79%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (17 July 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,110 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 29
- Videos
- 10
- Links
- 14
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 23s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 42.9% | |
| custom 5221940758826743186 | 2 | 28.6% | |
| custom 5229083018857038563 | 2 | 28.6% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
— the end?.. — yes.. #феликс:: здравствуйте,на связи владелец.я пришёл к выводу,что рест нам не помог и желание дальше вести флуд не появилось,хотя я искренне надеялся,что мы вернёмся с новыми силами.увы,не всё так просто.миффи закрывается.временно или нет,я пока не решил.может быть,когда-нибудь в будущем я открою его снова и он расцветёт новыми красками,с нью эрой,но врядли это случится в ближа…
custom 52290830188570385631
Sticker, posted without a caption
рады сотрудничеству!!
⭐⭐⚫️ᴇᴡ ⚫️ɴɪᴏɴ. 🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩ы @miffyfloodinfo ᴛᴀнцуᴇɯь ᴋᴀᴋ будᴛᴏ ᴏднᴀ 🤩ᴏ я @solofloodinf дᴇᴧᴀю ʙид, чᴛᴏ уʍᴇю быᴛь ᴄᴋᴩᴏʍныʍ. 🤩ы нᴇ ᴄᴋᴩᴏᴇʍᴄя ᴛᴏчнᴏ ᴄᴋᴏᴧьᴋᴏ нᴇ ᴨᴏʍᴇняᴧи бы ᴋᴏʍнᴀᴛ. 🤩 @solofloodinf ᴄʍᴏᴛᴩю нᴀ ᴛᴇбя и жᴀᴧᴇю, чᴛᴏ ʍы ϶ᴛᴏ дᴀжᴇ нᴇ ʙᴄᴨᴏʍниʍ. 🤩ᴏ, уʙы, ϶ᴛᴏ дᴀжᴇ нᴇ ᴄᴨᴏйᴧᴇᴩ 🤩 ᴄнᴏʙᴀ уᴄᴧыɯу… ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 🤩ы @miffyfloodinfo хᴏᴧᴏдный ᴄнᴇжный ᴨᴩинц. 🤩нуᴛᴩи @miffyfloodinfo ᴛʙᴏᴇй ᴦᴩуди ᴋᴩᴀᴄныᴇ яɜыᴋи. 🤩… 🤩 ᴏᴛбиʙɯиᴄ…
Sticker, posted without a caption
#феликс зайкии!!вы мне тоже нравитесь,люблю💓
ƇɾuʂԊ ℓISΤ люблю всех своих союзов, но этих чуть больше 💕 1.@poffoosfld не знаю почему, но их люблю особенно, у них такой классный вайб, и влд очень нравится 2.@Love_and_Desert их люблю без причины, тоже очень комфортный, приятный владелец 3.@aeris_flood тоже люблю без причины, у них такая классная атмосфера 4.@miffyfloodinfo владелец нравится 5.@splflood не сдержалась и добавила их, даже если закрыты, они мои…
Sticker, posted without a caption
рады союзу!!
заключили замечательный союз 🇺🇸🇺🇸 @miffyfloodinfo, очень очень любим вас и надеемся на долгое сотрудничество ❤️🔥❤️🔥
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @miffyfloodinfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,079,473 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@young_lixxie · 42 posts🪷•Aeris flood•~ info
@aeris_flood · 1021 post៹ ' あ ‶ cher͛r͛y ` ruşhh . .ᐟ
@chrrsh · 5251 postРест рп|𝐋𝐀𝐃⁀➴ᴸᵒᵛᵉ ᴬⁿᵈ ᴰᵉˢᵉʳᵗ|info
@Love_and_Desert · 521 post𝑴𝒂𝒇𝒊𝒂 𝒊𝒏 𝒍𝒂𝒘 ⁱⁿᶠᵒ
@mafiainf0 · 2061 postⓘ poffoos flood . . (014)
@poffoosfld · 2351 postРЕСТ ХАН | sᴏʟᴏ ꜰʟᴏᴏᴅ | ɪɴꜰᴏ ⊹ ࣪ ˖
@solofloodinf · 2271 post𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘭𝘦
@splflood · 1431 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔒 || м郃у ƒℓσσ∂ `ʍ⁰⁶ | ιηƒσ ᥫ᭡” (@miffyfloodinfo), 42 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miffyfloodinfo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.