27 May 2026, 03:54 UTC308 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
عيدكم مبارك ✨️ وتقبل اللّٰه منا ومنكم ✨️
💯2
Channel
| معيار العلم |
@mieyar_aleilm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
964subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001456910203 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mieyar_aleilm |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mieyar_aleilm |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 964 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:51 | 966 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 965 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 965 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
87 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 56 | 64.4% | |
| 👍 | 27 | 31.0% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 4.60% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 October 2024 to 27 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
25 May 2026, 23:00 UTC434 viewsread 6 August 2026
"أهل العلم والمنسبون للشريعة ينبغي أن يبنوا تديُّنهم على العزائم لا على الرخص، ومن ظن أن بناء الدين على الرخص يوجب قبوله في قلوب الخلق فقد زلَّ. فإنَّ ابن مسعود كان يقول: «إنَّ هذا الأمر جد، فإذا خلطتموه بالهزل مجَّته قلوب النَّاس»، فمن يتوهم أنَّه يُيسِّر الدين ببنائه على الرخص المجزوم بها، أو المظنونة، أو المتوهمة = فقد أخطأ طريقة الكتاب والسُّنَّة، فإنَّ الله عَزَّ وَجَلَّ لَمَّا أَمر أهل الكتاب قال لهم: ﴿خُذُوا …
21 Feb 2026, 02:42 UTC798 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
عن إبراهيم النخعي، قال: «من سره أن يحفظ الحديث فليحدِّث به ولو أن يحدث به من لا يشتهيه، فإنه إذا فعل ذلك كان كالكتاب في صدره». وعنه: «... حتى تدرسه، ثم تحفظه كأنه إمام». [الجامع لأخلاق الراوي وآداب السامع للخطيب ٢/٢٦٨]. https://t.me/mieyar_aleilm
❤6👍2💯1
11 Feb 2026, 14:44 UTC959 viewsread 6 August 2026
الْعِلْمُ وَيْحَكَ مَا فِي الصَّدْرِ تَجْمَعُهُ ... حِفْظًا وَفَهْمًا وَإِتْقَانًا فِدَاكَ أَبِ لَا مَا تَوَهَّمَهُ الْعَبْدِيُّ مِنْ سَفَهٍ ... إِذْ قَالَ مَا تَبْتَغِي عِنْدِي وَفِي كُتُبِي". ابن عبد البر ٤٦٣هـ - رحمه اللّٰه - [جامع بيان العلم وفضله ١ /٣٨٥]. https://t.me/mieyar_aleilm
25 Jan 2026, 12:03 UTC≈1,180 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo
الجزء المتعلق بالعلم من هذا الجامع الكبير، قد جُمعت فيه جملة حسنة مما في الأصول التسعة: (الصحيحين، والسنن الأربع، والمسند، والموطأ، وسنن الدارمي). وشملت المرفوعات والموقوفات والمقطوعات. فهو مما تحسن قراءته في هذا الباب. https://t.me/mieyar_aleilm
❤5
21 Jan 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,200 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
| أهمية جمع الأخبار وتمييز الآثار، وضم النظائر والأشكال | "وَقَدْ جَمَعَ أَقْوَامٌ فِي مِثْلِ مَا سُئِلْنَا عَنْهُ وَذَكَرْنَاهُ فِي كِتَابِنَا هَذَا أَبْوَابًا لَوْ رَأَيْتُهَا كَافِيَةً دَلَّلْتُ عَلَيْهَا وَلَكِنِّي رَأَيْتُ كُلَّ وَاحِدٍ مِنْهُمْ جَمَعَ مَا حَضَرَهُ وَحَفِظَهُ وَمَا خَشِيَ التَّفَلُّتَ عَلَيْهِ وَأَحَبَّ أَنْ يَنْظُرَ الْمُسْتَرْشِدُ إِلَيْهِ. وَلَوْ أَغْفَلَ الْعُلَمَاءُ جَمْعَ الْأَخْبَارِ و…
❤3👍1
23 Nov 2025, 06:22 UTC≈4,960 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
"لا تربط العلم بكتاب، بل اربطه بمسائله، ثم ابحثها في سبعين كتابًا !". الشيخ عبدالله ابن غديان -رحمه الله-. [مجلة الفقه الحنبلي | العدد الثاني | مسائل أبي عبدالله الفريح]. https://t.me/mieyar_aleilm
❤9👍6
11 Sept 2025, 12:04 UTC≈1,740 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
"من أعظم الأمور التي ينبغي أن يعقلَها طالب العلم ... : أن يعلم أنَّ موارد العلم التي تُوصله إلى النَّفس ثلاثة: . أولها: القلب. . وثانيها العين. . وثالثها: الأذن. وقد امْتَنَّ الله عَزَّوَجَلَّ في آياتٍ كثيرة على الخَلْق بأن جَعَل لهم السمع والأبصار والأفئدة؛ لأنَّ إدراك العلم لا يكون إلا بوجود هذه الموارد الثلاثة. وكلما قوي وجود معاني القوَّة في هذه الموارد الثلاثة قَوِيَ التَّحصيلُ ؛ فإذا كان القلب حاضرًا وكان الس…
👍4❤2
26 Jul 2025, 21:33 UTC≈1,430 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
"والأولى رد الأفراد إلى أنواعٍ كليَّة؛ لأن الضبط بالكلي أقوى من الضبط بالجزئي؛ فمعرفة الكليات تضبط الجزئيات، وتطويل الجزئيات يُصعِّب ضبطَها ". الشيخ د. صالح بن عبدالله العصيمي -حفظه الله- [شرح المفتاح في الفقه ص٤٤]. https://t.me/mieyar_aleilm
❤1👍1
24 Jul 2025, 19:26 UTC≈1,400 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
💯1
19 Jul 2025, 13:39 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
18 Jul 2025, 13:19 UTC≈1,290 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
(ونقل الخطيب البغدادي في «الجامع» عن بعضهم قال: «لَا يَنَالُ هَذَا العِلْمَ إِلَّا مَنْ عَطَّل دُكَّانَهُ، وَخَرَّبَ بُسْتَانَهُ، وَهَجَرَ إِخْوَانَهُ، وَمَاتَ أَقْرَبُ أَهْلِهِ فَلَمْ يَشْهَدْ جَنَازَتَهُ». وهذا كله وإن كانت فيه مبالغةٌ فالمقصود به: أنَّه لا بدَّ فيه مِن جَمْع القلب، واجتماع الفِكْرِ) [تذكرة السامع والمتكلم ص٨٨]. "وبه يُعلم أنَّ هذه الجُمَل المذكورة في كلام العياضي -رحمه الله تعالى- لا تُقصد بها …
❤4👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mieyar_aleilm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,191,862 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“| معيار العلم |” (@mieyar_aleilm), 964 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mieyar_aleilm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.