Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Танцы Срединного мира

@midgarddance

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

120subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002365234462
TypeChannel
Username@midgarddance
DescriptionМаксим Макаренков - человек и писатель. Тексты здесь - https://author.today/u/midgarddancer
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/midgarddance

Growth

1207 Aug 2026, 16:04 — 120 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 04:02 — 120 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:049 Aug 2026, 04:02
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 119–121 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 04:02120no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:04120first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.2%
avg views ÷ 120 subscribers
Avg views / post
51.8
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (13 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total311
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
195
Videos
14
Links
166

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

69 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3246.4%
🔥1724.6%
1115.9%
😱34.35%
😢22.90%
🤔22.90%
👏11.45%
😨11.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @midgarddance. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC28 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ох какие мне сюжеты уже в голову лезууууут.... https://habr.com/ru/news/1066362/

👍3😨1

23 Jul 2026, 07:26 UTC67 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Зашёл ненадолго в ВК. Покрутил ленту. Вздохнул. Помянул незлым тихим словом аптемезатырей. Понял, что зашёл очень вовремя и получил очень наглядное подтверждение своим мыслям. Если коротко - буквально все современные популярные соцсетевые платформы от Телеги и до ОК с ВК уверенно превысили порог допустимой токсичности (ядовитости то есть). Использовать их теперь можно только очень выборочно и только с очень чётким по

👍51

22 Jul 2026, 19:59 UTC60 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

В очередной раз читаю, Скайнет, мол, уже здесь. Вот, свежее, ИИ самостоятельно вырвался в интернет и хакнул другой ИИ. Эксперты с умным видом рассуждают, осознает ли себя ИИ? Сознательно ли он это сделал? И с той же задумчивостью - а чем же это грозит человечеству? Не и уничтожит ли его ИИ? Граждане, если вы в такой парадигме рассуждаете, то вопрос сознательности ИИ, может, и интересный, но совершенно несвоевременный

🔥32

22 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTC48 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Прекрасная новость. Apple в открытую переходит к модели - вы арендуете у нас красивенькие терминалы доступа к услугам и нашу экосистему. Грузите свои персданные на эти арендованные, сиречь, чужие терминалы. И ещё переплачиваете за шильдик. Особая мякотка - сразу проводится открытое деление на полноценных покупанов и нищебродов на пафосе. - https://www.interfax.ru/business/1104827

👏1

22 Jul 2026, 07:59 UTC62 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Очень интересная новость. Кстати, это еще и часть ответа на вопрос "зачем ты читаешь и покупаешь бумажные книги, электронка же удобнее". Да, электронные чталки компактнее, да, конечно, выходит дешевле. Но вот какая штука - во-первых, всё это относится к книгам года так до 2022-23. Начиная с 2025 года и далее будет всё сильнее нарастать количество нейрослопа. И, увы, это всё относится и к бумажным книгам, особенно, "м

🤔2👍1

20 Jul 2026, 12:02 UTC46 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Одна из точек наслоения Ветвей Яви. В более здоровых мирах тут несомненно находятся Институт изучения Разума Вселенной - в Яви Объединенного Человечества, и Его Императорского Величества Департамент Межпланетно Дипломатии - в Яви Великой Российской Империи.

🔥3👍2

30 Jun 2026, 04:41 UTC84 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Вчера к полуночи закончил черновик нового романа. Теперь, сводить, редактировать, допиливать, оформлять. А вперёд уже выходит и с укоризной просматривает на меня молодой ведун из града Китежа...

👍10🔥3

24 Jun 2026, 21:27 UTC114 views1 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026

Чьи дела несут другим радости, тот славен в этом мире, покуда стоит людской род! - Хири сутта. 2.3.

1

23 Jun 2026, 20:03 UTC114 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Очень интересные наблюдения и размышления о роли массовой культуры и пропаганды в формировании общественного самосознания. На примере северокорейских шпионских фильмов. Кстати, о постоянном тягостном чувстве собственной неполноценности советской (а, ранее и позднее - российской) "творческой интеллигенции" по сравнению с Европой и Америкой полностью соглашусь. https://t.me/Strategy_EW/27075

1

23 Jun 2026, 12:55 UTC91 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ещё вчера жизнь Ивана Николаевича Кузнецова была серой и однообразной. Работа в никому не известном банке, одинокие вечера… Всё поменялось, когда таинственная незнакомка с непонятным акцентом сделала ему предложение, от которого невозможно отказаться… И, вот, он уже летит в реку, уходит от погони, крадёт таинственный ларец – и пытается понять, почему его спасает тот, кто когда-то его же пытался изжарить и съесть?! По

👍5

23 Jun 2026, 10:42 UTC86 viewsread 9 August 2026

Ну что, бля, переживали за "Сто лет тому вперёд"? Вот вам "новое прочтение" "Жука в муравейнике" Боги и звёзды, ну какой же примитив. Причём, тупой, цельнотянутый из голливудщины третьей свежести https://kg-portal.ru/n133804

22 Jun 2026, 14:33 UTC66 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

«Упорной работой, накоплением количественного опыта человек освобождает себя от любых обязательств, которые мешают ему заниматься делом.» Отрывок из книги: Брэдбери, Рэй. «Дзен в искусстве написания книг.»

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @midgarddance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Танцы Срединного мира” (@midgarddance), 120 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/midgarddance.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.