Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MIDDLMARCH

@middlmarch_yu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,803subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001446908739
TypeChannel
Username@middlmarch_yu
Created1 September 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/middlmarch_yu

Growth

2,7982,8032,800.56 August 2026 — 2,798 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,798 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,799 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,803 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,797–2,804 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:552,803+4
9 Aug 2026, 21:522,799+1
6 Aug 2026, 11:042,798no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:452,798first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.0%
avg views ÷ 2,803 subscribers
Avg views / post
449
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held9 (27 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total4,045
Reactions total143
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

143 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9062.9%
💯1812.6%
❤‍🔥139.09%
🔥139.09%
👌85.59%
👍10.699%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC257 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вопрос. Кто в курсе о грозненской ординатуре по стоматологии? Напишите, как там, есть ли время подать документы

2

Signed Мадина

4 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC346 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новые записи в канале и все пока про культуру и важных ее составляющих🤍

6🔥2

Signed Мадина

3 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC378 viewsread 7 August 2026

Освободилось одно место в разговорный клуб) Писать @nemadina

Signed Мадина

1 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC428 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Все мы от Адама (мир ему) и Хаввы. Аллах создал нас народами и племенами, чтобы мы УЗНАВАЛИ друг друга. Не для того, чтобы мы испытывали друг к другу ненави' из-за нашей непохожести. Мы и не должны иметь общие ценности, мировоззрение, традиции, но мы должны перенимать друг у друга хорошее и оставлять то, что для нас чуждо. Относитесь друг к другу хорошо. Лучше, чем другие, нас делает только одно - богобоязненность и

17💯4🔥4

Signed Мадина

1 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC464 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Почти каждый раз, когда я набираю группы, некоторые люди пишут «Только не наших не обучай» Есть замечательные слова, авторство которых приписывают А.П. Чехову: «Сколько языков ты знаешь, столько раз ты человек» И я с этим абсолютно согласна. Мы изучаем языки, чтобы коснуться культуры другого мира, наши душа и мысли соприкасаются посредством языка других душ, относительно которых мы строим только предположения, если н

31💯9🔥7

Signed Мадина

1 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC461 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В этой жизни человек не выбирает три вещи: внешность, с которой он рождается, национальность и семья. И тот, кто испытывает отвращение к другим и дискредитирует людей по этим трем признакам — ничем не отличается от тех, кто чинит несправедливость и зульм. Тот, кто возвышается тем, чего он не выбирал или ненавидит другого человека за то, что он не выбирал — идиот. Хьуна цхьа а везаш ца хилча, хьо цхьаннах вешаш ца х

18❤‍🔥5💯5

Signed Мадина

28 Jul 2026, 16:16 UTC614 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Самая токсичная подборка)))

❤‍🔥84👌2

Signed Мадина

27 Jul 2026, 21:46 UTC545 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

— Вуо нах дацхьуна вай, даций? — Дера дац, вуо нах дац, боьхумш йу-кх

👌61

Signed Мадина

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @middlmarch_yu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 155,374 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MIDDLMARCH” (@middlmarch_yu), 2,803 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/middlmarch_yu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.