Channel
@midad04
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,368subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003346152826 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @midad04 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/midad04 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 2,368 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 2,364 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:40 | 2,368 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 2,368 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 46,388 |
| Reactions total | 947 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
888 reactions across 18 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 871 | 98.1% | |
| 👎 | 17 | 1.91% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,025reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Горшок для мочи делает насыха. Ас-Сюты приводит историю о чудесах (караматах) ибн Араби: «Некоторые суфии пригласили нас на угощение в районе «Зукак аль-Канадиль» в Египте. Там собралась группа шейхов. Подали еду, и поставили сосуды. Среди них был новый стеклянный сосуд, предназначенный для мочи (справлять в него нужду), — но им ещё не пользовались. Хозяин дома набрал в него еду и стал подавать её присутствующим.…
👍22👎2
Ас-Суюты рассказывает среди чудес ибн Араби, как горшок для мочи сделал наставление суфистским шейхам.
👍17👎1
Реальность. Какое бы хорошее изречение древнегреческого, западного или восточного философа ты ни нашёл, — в текстах и преданиях, дошедших от саляфов, найдётся нечто более красноречивое и лучшее. Однако незнание собственных сокровищниц и желание прославиться побуждают некоторых распространять высказывания этих людей (философов) , хотя они и были самыми невежественными людьми относительно Аллаха. — Шейх Абдуллах ибн…
👍72
Передается, что Салим, сын Абдуллаха ибн Умара, рассказывал: «Ещё при жизни моего отца я женился. Среди тех, кого мы пригласили, был Абу Айюб аль-Ансари. Стены моего дома были украшены зелёными тканями. Абу Айюб пришёл и, войдя в дом, увидел меня стоящим. Осмотревшись, он заметил, что стены дома покрыты зелёными тканями. Увидев это, он обратился к моему отцу со словами: — О Абдуллах! Неужели вы покрываете стены т…
👍49
Шейх Суляйман ибн АбдиЛлях - внук муджаддида отвечая на вопрос говорит: «это то, что сказал имам, аль-хафиз - ас-Суюты» 📚См. Дурар ас-Сания 5/32. ❗️Это при том, что ас-Суюты: дозволял взывание к мертвым, призывал к этому, был крайним суфием, который верил, что суфистские шейхи управляют миром, отрицал сыфаты Аллаха, верил в то, что пророк живой, ходит среди нас и суфистские шейхи встречаются с ним и т.д Человек…
👍59👎6
Вас-васы (наущения) нужно игнорировать еще вначале. Имам Ибрахим ат-Тайми сказал: «первое где начинаются вас-васы (наущения) это омовение». 📚См. Мусаннаф ибн Аби Шайбы 35,893. Если тут не остановить их они уйдут дальше и избавиться будет сложнее.
👍59👎1
Вопрос к тем, кто дозволяет участие в выборах: как вы относитесь к этому её шагу? Если плохо, то почему?
👍27
У ихванов новый герой. Считающая себя мусульманкой и носящая «хиджаб» израильская активистка Палестинского происхождения - Сумая Башир выдвинула свою кандидатуру на выборах в кнессет израиля от партии «демократы». Фетвы «мудрецов» и книга ас-Сулеймани с именами тридцати учёных, кто дозволяет «работать в хукумате», до неё тоже, видимо, дошли.
👍27
Извлеките урок из нападок ашаритов и тех, кто им потакает, на имама ад-Дарими. Несмотря на то что имам ад-Дарими опровергал не Абуль-Хасана аль-Аш’ари, а крайних джахмитов эпохи саляфов, эти ашариты разгневались на него. Причина их гнева заключается в их связи с джахмитами, особенно с одним из глав заблуждения — Бишром аль-Мариси, чьи искажения атрибутов Аллаха они перенесли в свои книги один в один. - Шейх АбдуЛл…
👍63
Кто-то может сказать: «Неужели ты собираешься опровергать неверующих аятами Корана? Ведь они не принимают Коран! Поэтому нужно изучать философию». Ответ: разве Аллах не ниспосылал эти аяты в Мекке именно для опровержения многобожников, иудеев и христиан, которые не верили в Коран? Это указывает на то, что в Книге Аллаха и Сунне Его Посланника содержится достаточно как текстуальных, так и разумных доводов, чтобы опр…
👍130
Имам Харб аль-Кирмани ум. 280 г.х - Абу Бакр аль-Халляль сказал: он (Харб) был знатным человеком. Абу Бакр Аль-Маррузи (ближайший ученик имама Ахмада) побудил меня поехать к нему (для учебы у него). - Аз-Захаби добавил: книга «Масаиль» Харба из драгоценнейших книг ханбалитов. Она большая, в двух томах. См. Сияр а’лям ан-нубаляъ 13/245
👍48
Ко всем последователям Абу шубухата аль-Майдани вопрос: как там у вас в семейной жизни? Не запрещаете же женам своим общаться с мужчинами так «для души»?
👍59
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @midad04. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 29,025 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مداد” (@midad04), 2,368 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/midad04.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.