模型训练的差不多了,还在调,大家等等
❤1

Channel
@miao_ai_chan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002214832573 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @miao_ai_chan |
| Description | 喵呜AI实验室 Catificial Intelligence Lab | 通知频道 |
| Created | 1 June 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miao_ai_chan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 8 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 8 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 1 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2024 to 28 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
模型训练的差不多了,还在调,大家等等
❤1
来喂模型点禁忌知识
Photo, posted without a caption
公益docker镜像: fasterdocker.top
清洗中
已经差不多收集完成,暑假准备开炼
完全不够塞牙缝的
有没有谁,知道哪里有渠道买晋江vip号,推我下
RWKV训练小说模型效果十分不理想,准备改炼Qwen14B或Qwen72B,也可能是Yi-9B或Yi-32B。
芙宁娜 (AI歌手)辞九门回忆
File, posted without a caption
喵呜AI - 芙宁娜SOVITS模型(用于AI唱歌) 说明:G开头的是生成器模型,D开头的是判别器模型 G开头的可以用于生成,D开头的用于训练更多步数 芙芙的模型,共训练4.7万步,效果还行 继续练的可以拿训练素材,按正常流程走一遍(预处理,生成config),最后一步开始训练的时候选继续上次的训练就行了。 训练素材使用的是公开的,也附上了~ ZIP包是训练素材,带标签的
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @miao_ai_chan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“喵呜AI实验室” (@miao_ai_chan), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miao_ai_chan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.