Channel
@miandianzhonwenwang
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,294subscribers
-38 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002074091304 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @miandianzhonwenwang |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miandianzhonwenwang |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 2,294 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 2,299 | +2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 2,297 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 2,305 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 2,310 | +6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 2,304 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 2,308 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 2,309 | -11 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 2,320 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 2,328 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 2,330 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 2,332 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 12 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
46 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 60.9% | |
| 💩 | 8 | 17.4% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 6.52% | |
| 🤷 | 2 | 4.35% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2025 to 18 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#X6宝马会 #黑平台 排名一夜清空，打码变打劫！ X6宝马会平台简直就是“杀会员”专业户！自己下午联系客服询问情况时，对方还装得人模狗样，说什么“冲多少杀多少是看运气”。 结果晚上刚领了上周打码奖金666美金——打码量6200、排名37——提现成功，心想这周已经升到排名35、打码5500，准备下线休息。 谁知道一觉醒来，发现账号的排名被清空！更夸张的是那几分钟时间，平台排行榜居然蹦出一群“打码大哥”，几分钟打了100-200万U的量？ 这什么神仙操作？一个平台多个“排行榜版本”，名字、排名全对不上，简直是割韭菜都不演了！ 多次数据不一致，明显“杀熟”、“杀奖”、“杀排名”平台后台操作痕迹太明显。
❤14🎉3👏1🔥1🥰1
缅甸佐兰人民国防军使用机枪攻击政府军飞机 #缅甸 #钦邦 #机枪 #打飞机
❤5
陈志鹏失联的第32天没有任何消息， 弟弟你在哪，你给妈妈报个平安，妈妈整天以泪洗面，瞬间白了头，你让妈妈怎么活啊
❤1
一个三面都被缅北包围的城市，会不会很不安全？ 实际情况是这里的人们生活很舒适#地理知识 #瑞丽 #云南 #缅北
#网友投稿 #缅甸黑平台 #58lucky 黑平台曝光 在58lucky 累计充值了一亿多缅币 昨天中奖了 三亿多一点缅币 就说什么系统故障 只算给400多万缅币 不给提现各种扯皮 大家可以看图片 就这样没给提现的平台 希望大家及时止损 望网友们互相告知！
💩6❤3🤷2👎1😁1
佤联军🇲🇲 缅甸实力最强的民族武装，佤邦联合军#南佤地区171训练日常
#随拍 #缅甸佤邦
❤2
缅甸佤邦公判实录，华籍罪犯绑架抢劫，当法外之地逍遥结果栽了
缅甸姑娘也是可怜，只能在瑞丽找最差的老汉，到不了大城市找优秀的精英！
💩2❤1
#缅北#克钦邦
辽宁#00后女孩 被“#高富帅男友 ”骗至缅甸，母亲发声：女儿曾说认识一名“长得挺帅、条件很好的男朋友”，曾和“男朋友”坐飞机到香港，后入境#泰国 （大象新闻、新京报）
❤2
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @miandianzhonwenwang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“缅甸中文网|缅甸新闻|吃瓜视频｜缅甸赌场” (@miandianzhonwenwang), 2,294 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miandianzhonwenwang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.