Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for mgsave

Channel

mgsave

@mgsave

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

280subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002151511024
TypeChannel
Username@mgsave
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mgsave

Growth

2782802797 August 2026 — 279 subscribers8 August 2026 — 279 subscribers16 August 2026 — 278 subscribers24 August 2026 — 280 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 278–280 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 21:48280+2
16 Aug 2026, 16:45278-1
8 Aug 2026, 08:33279no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:31279first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 2 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.7%
avg views ÷ 280 subscribers
Avg views / post
30.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held16 (2 June 20268 August 2026)
Views total30
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 56s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤩743.8%
🎉637.5%
😱318.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC30 viewsread 8 August 2026

update Нормализовал работу кешей Обновил работу капчи, теперь все отображается и принимается правильно

31 Jul 2026, 10:55 UTC≈2,650 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🆕 Бот был обновлён: · 💬 Добавил поддержку многих типов сообщений! · 😍 Claude в качестве неиро! · ❌ Потери удаленных сообщений минимальны, все удалённые сообщения собеседника с 99% вероятностью будут отправлены вам в лс 🎉 Напоминаю о розыгрыше ❗️ Telegram начал идентифицировать бота как сессию

🤩1

31 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTC404 viewsread 8 August 2026

Клауд доступен для выбора в основном боте! /config —> «Неиро ответ» —> «Изменить модель неиро»

25 Jul 2026, 17:26 UTC273 viewsread 8 August 2026

🤖 Снова обновил клонов: Все ссылки на инструкции по боту ведут на анонимный канал — @noob_and_pro В этом канале никогда не будет никаких упоминаний бота/канала.

25 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC189 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤖 Снова обновил клонов: — Кнопку "Создать своего клона" можно скрыть у пользователей вашего клона — Поддержка прямо в чате клона Без каких либо упоминаний и тд, все автоматизировано и сообщения попадают в группу поддержки где вашим пользователям анонимного помогут. (под анонимно я подразумеваю без каких либо упоминаний основного бота)

25 Jul 2026, 16:08 UTC138 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤖 Обновил клонов! Было добавлено: — 🎨 Меню кастомизации Пока-что можно обновить только медиа из команды /start, но дальше больше! (накидайте идей) — 🛡 Автоматическое удаление проблемного канала из обязательной подписки: Если боту хоть раз не выйдет проверить подписан ли пользователь на обязательный канал который настроили вы (причины могут быть разные, от удаления бота с канала до ошибки телеграм) бот

24 Jul 2026, 16:25 UTC82 viewsread 8 August 2026

Модель deepseek-chat больше не поддерживается. все у кого эта модель была выбрана были перенесены на deepseek-v4-flash (эта модель теперь по умолчанию) Поменять модель можно самостоятельно: /config —> "Неиро-ответ" —> Изменить модель неиронки

21 Jul 2026, 20:32 UTC154 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Весь день сегодня лотаю ошибки с момента написания этого поста Выявил только то что на некоторые текста внутри бота (к примеру промт для роли неиро) нужно писать по несколько раз чтобы бот словил этот текст ✅ Исправил Бот не отправлял одноразки ✅ Исправил Бот отправлял одно удаленное сообщение несколько раз подряд ✅ Исправил Неиро не работал вообще при глобальной настройке "Не реагируй на мои сообщения" в конфиге

🎉1🤩1

21 Jul 2026, 19:58 UTC91 viewsread 8 August 2026

Оказывается одноразки не сохранялись. Уже поправил, ошибка была на уровне системы а не бота...

20 Jul 2026, 07:54 UTC109 viewsread 8 August 2026

Глобально поменял саму систему работы бота, возможны: 1. Неработоспособность модулей 2. Тотальный игнор от бота на все команды кроме каких-то команд (или в целом тотальный игнор) БЕЗ уведомлений "Не спамь" или капчи 3. Игнор нажатий на инлайн кнопки (это те что под некоторыми сообщениями) 4. Пишешь одну команду а в ответ приходит что-то другое (к примеру на команду старт бот отправляет профиль) 5. Неработоспособност

18 Jul 2026, 04:07 UTC131 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🥳 Сегодня ночью бот был обновлён 🥳 🤩 Что нового: ├── 🆕 Команда /ls для получения ссылки на удаленный диалог ├── 🌟 Модуль «Неиро-ответ» стал умнее: ├──Можно поменять модель ИИшки ├──Неиро ищет в интернете информацию │ (только на моделях GPT) ├──Общие режимы модуля │ (не отвечать на мои сообщения во всех │ чатах, или отключить по умолчанию │ во всех чатах) └── Неиро умеет ген

🤩3🎉1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @mgsave. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 143,358 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“mgsave” (@mgsave), 280 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mgsave.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.