Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mexican Narcos

Channel

Mexican Narcos

@mexicannarcos

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

27,671subscribers

+1,900 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003092837719
TypeChannel
Username@mexicannarcos
DescriptionЗдравствуйте, это новый канал Mexican Narcos, в этом канале будут поститься разные посты по тематике мексиканских картелей
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mexicannarcos

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,77127,67126,7217 August 2026 — 25,771 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,784 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,820 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,838 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,846 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,866 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,904 subscribers15 August 2026 — 25,943 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,987 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,977 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,993 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,023 subscribers21 August 2026 — 26,046 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26,098 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,120 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,130 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,153 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,194 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,339 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,380 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,428 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,459 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,486 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,547 subscribers4 September 2026 — 26,604 subscribers6 September 2026 — 26,725 subscribers9 September 2026 — 26,807 subscribers12 September 2026 — 26,856 subscribers13 September 2026 — 26,919 subscribers15 September 2026 — 26,959 subscribers17 September 2026 — 27,002 subscribers26 September 2026 — 27,671 subscribers7 August 202626 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 50 days, net +1,900. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,486–27,956 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 11:1927,671+669
17 Sept 2026, 13:5927,002+43
15 Sept 2026, 10:0026,959+40
13 Sept 2026, 21:2126,919+63
12 Sept 2026, 02:3726,856+49
9 Sept 2026, 21:0026,807+82
6 Sept 2026, 12:5926,725+121
4 Sept 2026, 01:0126,604+57
2 Sept 2026, 15:2326,547+61
1 Sept 2026, 12:2526,486+27
31 Aug 2026, 12:0826,459+31
30 Aug 2026, 11:4526,428+48
29 Aug 2026, 09:4426,380+41
28 Aug 2026, 10:3426,339+145
27 Aug 2026, 07:5326,194+41
26 Aug 2026, 04:4426,153+23
25 Aug 2026, 04:5426,130+10
24 Aug 2026, 05:3526,120+22
22 Aug 2026, 12:0326,098+52
21 Aug 2026, 02:2426,046first reading

Engagement

208 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.70%
avg views ÷ 27,671 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,850
64 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.927%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
64
of 208 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held208 (5 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total118,696
Reactions total1,100
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 00:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,110
Videos
≈1,940
Links
≈194

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 13m
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 136 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,264 reactions across 207 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥80824.8%
🤡67620.7%
❤57617.6%
🤣40812.5%
👍2527.72%
🫡1624.96%
🥰1354.14%
🕊662.02%
👎651.99%
😁320.98%
❤‍🔥260.797%
🥴210.643%
😍110.337%
🌭60.184%
👏40.123%
👌30.092%
😡30.092%
😱30.092%
😢20.061%
🎃10.031%
4 further kinds40.123%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 207 of the 208 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,264 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 208 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 19:45 UTC890 views13 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥8🤡4❤1

29 Sept 2026, 19:43 UTC924 views15 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤7🤡5🥰2🤣1

29 Sept 2026, 19:33 UTC851 views20 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

🇷🇺 Мичоакан 💧💧🐓Сикарио Dos Aguas из CJNG под прозвищем Babo R8, действующий в Котихе💧💧🐓. 🇲🇽 Michoacán 💧💧🐓Sicario de Dos Aguas del CJNG, apodado Babo R8, que opera en Cotija💧💧🐓. 🇺🇸 Michoacán 💧💧🐓Dos Aguas sicario from CJNG , nicknamed Babo R8, operating in Cotija💧💧🐓. Хэштеги/Hashtags: #Michoacán #Cotija #CJNG #cartels #monstruos #Mexico

❤9🤡6❤‍🔥2🔥1🥰1🫡1

28 Sept 2026, 16:55 UTC≈1,630 views19 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

🇷🇺 Примечательно, что у одного из сикариос можно увидеть рюкзак для подачи патронов на 1000 штук. 🇲🇽 Cabe destacar que se puede ver a uno de los sicarios con una mochila de alimentación de munición de 1000 cartuchos. 🇺🇸 Notably, one of the sicarios can be seen wearing a 1000-round backpack ammunition feed system.

🔥10🤡6❤1👍1🥰1

28 Sept 2026, 16:52 UTC≈1,550 views29 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

🇷🇺 🤫💐🐓Сикариос Gente Del Serio из CJNG где-то в Герреро🤫💐🐓. 🇲🇽 🤫💐🐓Sicarios de la Gente Del Serio del CJNG en algún lugar de Guerrero🤫💐🐓. 🇺🇸 🤫💐🐓Gente Del Serio sicarios from CJNG somewhere in Guerrero🤫💐🐓. Хэштеги/Hashtags: #Guerrero #CJNG #cartels #Mexico

👍12🤡10❤4🔥2🥰1

28 Sept 2026, 16:32 UTC≈1,610 views20 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

🇷🇺 🐭🤠Сикариос Gente Nueva из MZ где-то в Чиуауа🐭🤠. 🇲🇽 🐭🤠 Sicarios de Gente Nueva del MZ en algún lugar de Chihuahua 🐭🤠. 🇺🇸 🐭🤠Gente Nueva sicarios from MZ somewhere in Chihuahua 🐭🤠 Хэштеги/Hashtags: #Chihuahua #CDS #MZ #cartels #monstruos #Mexico

❤9🤡7🥰3🔥1

27 Sept 2026, 21:03 UTC≈2,420 views26 reactionsread 29 September 2026

🇷🇺 🐓Самодельная мина, найденная сикарио из CJNG где-то в Мичоакане🐓. 🇲🇽 🐓Mina casera encontrada por un sicario del CJNG en algún lugar de Michoacán🐓. 🇺🇸 🐓A homemade mine found by a CJNG sicario somewhere in Michoacán🐓. Хэштеги/Hashtags: #Michoacán #CJNG #cartels #IED #Mexico

🔥11🤡9❤4🫡1😁1

27 Sept 2026, 18:13 UTC≈2,420 views21 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

🇷🇺 Чиуауа 👆Сикариос La Linea из Nuevo Cartel De Juárez в Сан-Игнасио-де-лос-Кано, муниципалитет Гуадалупе-и-Кальво👆. 🇲🇽 Chihuahua 👆Los sicarios de La Linea del Nuevo Cartel De Juárez en San Ignacio de los Cano, municipio de Guadalupe y Calvo👆. 🇺🇸 Chihuahua 👆La Linea sicarios from Nuevo Cartel De Juárez in San Ignacio de los Cano, municipality of Guadalupe y Calvo👆. Хэштеги/Hashtags: #Chihuahua #GuadalupeyCalvo #NCDJ …

🔥8🤣8❤2🤡2🥰1

27 Sept 2026, 15:30 UTC≈2,410 views31 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

🇷🇺 🛡⚔️Командирша Los Caballeros Templarios под прозвищем Barby, действующая в Мичоакане🛡⚔️. 🇲🇽 🛡⚔️La comandante de Los Caballeros Templarios, conocida como Barby, que opera en Michoacán🛡⚔️. 🇺🇸 🛡⚔️A female commander of Los Caballeros Templarios, known by the alias Barby, operating in Michoacán🛡⚔️. Хэштеги/Hashtags: #Michoacán #LCT #cartels #Mexico

👎16❤10🔥2😁2🕊1

27 Sept 2026, 12:51 UTC≈2,440 views15 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥9👎4🤡1🥰1

27 Sept 2026, 06:49 UTC≈2,350 views23 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

🇷🇺 Мичоакан 🔺🐓🆚⚔️🛡Оператор дрона Grupo Delta из CJNG бомбит сикариос из Los Caballeros Templarios в Апацингане🔺🐓🆚⚔️🛡. 🇲🇽 Michoacán 🔺🐓🆚⚔️🛡 Operador de drones de Grupo Delta del CJNG bombardea a sicarios de Los Caballeros Templarios en Apatzingán 🔺🐓🆚⚔️🛡. 🇺🇸 Michoacán 🔺🐓🆚⚔️🛡 Grupo Delta drone operator from CJNG bombs Los Caballeros Templarios sicarios in Apatzingán 🔺🐓🆚⚔️🛡. Хэштеги/Hashtags: #Michoacán #Apatzingán #CJNG

🤡14🔥6❤2🥰1

27 Sept 2026, 06:14 UTC≈2,300 views18 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

🇷🇺 👾🦍🌲Сикариос Gente Del 80 под командованием Comando Juguete из Cartel De La Sierra (Los Tlacos) где-то в Герреро👾🦍🌲. 🇲🇽 👾🦍🌲Sicarios de la Gente Del 80, al mando del Comando Juguete del Cártel De La Sierra (Los Tlacos) en algún lugar de Guerrero👾🦍🌲. 🇺🇸 👾🦍🌲Gente Del 80 sicarios, under the command of Comando Juguete from the Cartel De La Sierra (Los Tlacos) somewhere in Guerrero👾🦍🌲. Хэштеги/Hashtags: #Guerrero #CDLS #

🤡13👍4🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 208 posts we hold for @mexicannarcos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@mexicannarcos edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 September 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mexican Narcos” (@mexicannarcos), 27,671 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mexicannarcos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.