3 measurements spanning 2 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 524–537 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 05:59
535
+10
17 Sept 2026, 05:22
525
no change
17 Sept 2026, 04:47
525
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 11 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
89.1%
avg views ÷ 535 subscribers
Avg views / post
477
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 September 2026
Posts held
17 (11 September 2026 – 16 September 2026)
Views total
7,152
Reactions total
90
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Sept 2026, 05:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
90 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
59
65.6%
❤
15
16.7%
🥰
8
8.89%
🔥
6
6.67%
⚡
1
1.11%
❤🔥
1
1.11%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2026 to 16 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
2-POST. HÖREN
📌 MULTILEVEL IMTIHONI ANATOMIYASI — 2/5
🎧 HÖREN — TINGLAB TUSHUNISH
Multilevel Hören bo‘limida nomzod eshitilgan axborotni tushunishi, kerakli ma’lumotni ajratishi va asosiy fikrni aniqlashi kerak.
Bu bo‘limda uchta asosiy tinglash strategiyasi muhim:
🔹 globales Hören — umumiy mazmunni tushunish;
🔹 selektives Hören — kerakli ma’lumotni topish;
🔹 detailliertes Hören — tafsilotlarn…
1-POST. MULTILEVEL IMTIHONI NIMA?
📌 MULTILEVEL IMTIHONI ANATOMIYASI — 1/5
🇺🇿 Multilevel nemis tili imtihoni nima?
Multilevel — nomzodning nemis tilini bilish darajasini bir imtihon orqali B1, B2 yoki C1 darajada aniqlashga mo‘ljallangan milliy sertifikat imtihoni.
Imtihonda 4 ta asosiy ko‘nikma tekshiriladi:
🎧 Hören — tinglab tushunish
📖 Lesen — o‘qib tushunish
✍️ Schreiben — yozish
🗣 Sprechen — gapirish
Multil…
🟠 BUGUNGI METOD: „BALANCEAKT“
🪙 Muvozanat, tezlik va jamoaviy strategiya
Jamoaga bitta oddiy vazifa beriladi: 10 ta tangani imkon qadar tez aylana bo‘ylab uzatish. Ammo bitta muhim shart bor — tangani uzatishda faqat barmoq uchlari bir-biriga tegishi mumkin!
Oddiy ko‘ringan bu mashq tez orada haqiqiy jamoaviy strategiya sinoviga aylanadi. 😊
🔎 Qanday o‘tkaziladi?
O‘quvchilar aylana shaklida turadilar. Birinchi o‘quvc…
🟦 BUGUNGI IKKINCHI METOD: „BLÄTTERN“
📖 Sahifa varaqlash orqali diqqatni jamlash
Sinf shovqin bo‘lib ketdi, o‘quvchilarning diqqati tarqoqmi? Ularni tinchlantirish uchun baland ovozda „Jim bo‘ling!“ deyish shart emas. 😊
„Blättern“ — o‘quvchilarni qisqa vaqt ichida sokinlashtirish va ularning tinglash hamda diqqatni jamlash qobiliyatini faollashtirishga qaratilgan oddiy mashq.
🔎 Qanday o‘tkaziladi?
O‘quvchilar o‘qit…
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🟢 BUGUNGI METOD: „ALPHABETDIALOG“
🔤 Alifbo asosidagi dialog
O‘quvchilarning gapirish faolligi, lug‘at boyligi va tez fikrlashini bir vaqtning o‘zida rivojlantiradigan qiziqarli metodlardan biri — Alphabetdialog.
🔎 Metod qanday ishlaydi?
O‘quvchilar juftlikda yoki kichik guruhda ma’lum bir mavzu bo‘yicha suhbat olib boradilar. Asosiy qoida juda oddiy:
👉 har bir yangi gap alifbodagi navbatdagi harf bilan boshlanishi k…
🎯 Metod: „1–2–3“ Energizer
Darsda o‘quvchilar charchab, diqqat susaya boshladimi? Unda atigi 5 daqiqalik „1–2–3“ metodi yordam beradi. Bu mashq o‘quvchilarni harakatga keltiradi, diqqatni qayta jamlashga va guruhdagi muhitni jonlantirishga xizmat qiladi.
Qanday o‘tkaziladi?
O‘quvchilar juftlikda bir-biriga qarama-qarshi turadi va navbatma-navbat 1–2–3 deb sanaydi:
👉 A: eins → B: zwei → A: drei → B: eins...
Keyin vaz…
🌙 KECHKI METODIK SUHBAT: Gapini tugatsin, keyin birga tuzatamiz 😊
Aziz hamkasblar, tushdagi vaziyatni eslaymiz: odatda kam gapiradigan o‘quvchimiz suhbatga qo‘shildi, lekin shunday dedi:
💬 „Am Samstag ich spiele Fußball … Danach wir essen Pizza …“
Mashqning maqsadi — fikrini erkin bayon qilish edi. Shu vaziyatda men o‘quvchiga gapini tugatish imkonini berib, xatolarga mashqdan keyin qaytishni tanlagan bo‘lardim.
…
☀️ TUSHGI METODIK SUHBAT: Siz nima qilgan bo‘lardingiz?
Aziz hamkasblar, ertalab xatoni qachon tuzatish haqida gaplashdik. Endi bir vaziyatni ko‘rib chiqamiz. 😊
👩🏫 Darsda o‘quvchilar dam olish kunlari haqida suhbatlashmoqda. Mashqning maqsadi — o‘z fikrini erkin bayon qilish.
Odatda kam gapiradigan o‘quvchingiz bugun suhbatga qo‘shildi:
💬 „Am Samstag ich spiele Fußball mit meinen Freunden. Danach wir essen Pizza…
☀️ Xayrli tong, aziz hamkasblar!
🗣 O‘quvchi gapiryapti… Xatosini hoziroq tuzatamizmi?
Tasavvur qiling, o‘quvchingiz dam olish kuni haqida gapira boshladi:
💬 „Am Samstag ich spiele Fußball …“
Siz esa ichingizda: «Fe’l ikkinchi o‘rinda turishi kerak-ku!» deb o‘yladingiz. 😊
Shu payt o‘zimizga bitta savol beraylik: bu mashqda asosiy maqsad nima?
🎯 Agar maqsad — fikrini erkin bayon qilish bo‘lsa…
Fikri tushunarli b…
🌙 METODIK VAZIYAT TAHLILI: Biri gapiradi, ikkinchisi tinglaydi…
Tushdagi vaziyatni eslaymiz: „Meine Freizeit“ mavzusidagi juftlik ishida bir o‘quvchi faol gapiryapti, sherigi esa jim.
Qaysi yo‘lni tanlash kerak? Bu jimlikning sababiga bog‘liq. Keling, taklif qilingan yechimlarni ko‘rib chiqamiz.
🔎 1. Avval sababini aniqlash
O‘quvchi so‘z topolmayaptimi, topshiriqni tushunmadimi yoki sherigi unga navbat bermayapti…
Keyingi yilda Germaniya federativ respublikasida malaka oshirishni xohlaysizmi? Unda ulgurib qoling, 1-oktabrgacha ariza yuborishga vaqtingiz bor.
Ariza joʻnatish uchun havola
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @metodyordam_toshkent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2026 to 16 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Metodik yordam DEUTSCH” (@metodyordam_toshkent), 535 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/metodyordam_toshkent.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.