Раз в полгода я вспоминаю , что у меня есть книга , которую в бумажном варианте найти сложно, но в электронном она всегда доступна здесь https://app.lava.top/products/abcc3da7-236e-4bac-b2f9-e6f52496cb95
❤5🔥2custom 51928704659572777601

Channel
@metodesnera
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,917subscribers
-135 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001213725542 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @metodesnera |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/metodesnera |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:28 | 8,917 | -11 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:58 | 8,928 | -11 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:48 | 8,939 | -1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 12:06 | 8,940 | -11 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:06 | 8,951 | -6 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 00:05 | 8,957 | -6 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 02:40 | 8,963 | +20 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 16:55 | 8,943 | -45 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 8,988 | -12 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 9,000 | +8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 8,992 | +43 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:37 | 8,949 | -8 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 8,957 | -13 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:27 | 8,970 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 8,981 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 8,989 | -11 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:19 | 9,000 | -8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 9,008 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 9,016 | -15 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 9,031 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 40 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,119 reactions across 35 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 566 | 50.6% | |
| ❤ | 355 | 31.7% | |
| custom 5192870465957277760 | 71 | 6.34% | |
| 😍 | 38 | 3.40% | |
| 🍾 | 37 | 3.31% | |
| 🙏 | 16 | 1.43% | |
| 🍓 | 15 | 1.34% | |
| custom 5226962958575217382 | 7 | 0.626% | |
| 🤗 | 7 | 0.626% | |
| 😈 | 6 | 0.536% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.089% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,119 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @metodesnera. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Раз в полгода я вспоминаю , что у меня есть книга , которую в бумажном варианте найти сложно, но в электронном она всегда доступна здесь https://app.lava.top/products/abcc3da7-236e-4bac-b2f9-e6f52496cb95
❤5🔥2custom 51928704659572777601
Многие люди не хотят разбираться в своих проблемах только потому, что за ними ничего нет . Нет интереса. Нет хобби. Нет целей. Скучно , не ясно. А это больше всего пугает мозг. Другое дело , когда в твоей жизни творится дичь, которую ты постоянно разруливаешь. У тебя останется даже место почувствовать себя героем и выпить бокал виски за временную передышку. Когда перестанешь бояться пустоты и неизвестности и начну…
❤20🔥9😍4custom 51928704659572777601
Вот и лето прошло … Разговоры о том , кто и как его провел/прое*ал (нужное подчеркнуть) еще какое то время будут звучать за столикам кафе и кухонь. Кто докупит кусочек лета за деньги в сентябре. В остальном нас ждет прекрасных 4 месяца года, когда ты так или иначе отдохнул , напитался витамином Д, даже если ты домосед из Петербурга и можно продуктивно провести остаток года. Осталось только понять - как? А значит …
❤10custom 51928704659572777604🔥1
Подкаст : «Хочу больше денег , но сама себя торможу» Занять место на программе «Путь героиня» по лучшим условиям и получить все бонусы в виде личных сессий —> @lovebor_producer
🔥9❤7custom 51928704659572777602
Кто следит ? Бабье лето с СПб ждем ?)
❤2
Последние недели провёл много разборов. И вот главное что вижу. Самый частый запрос - нет мотивации зарабатывать больше. База закрыта, жить можно. А двигаться дальше - как будто незачем. Разобрал. Вот три причины. Первое - мотивация это энергия. Если энергии нет - мотивации не будет. Точка. И дело не в лени. Энергию съедает выгорание - когда делаешь много, а результата нет. Хронический стресс - он кажется мобилизу…
🔥19❤3🍾2
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥8❤6😈3custom 51928704659572777602
Этот пост только для женщин, которые хотят большего. Тебе уже не надо идти в школу. В прямом и переносном смысле. У тебя уже есть опыт, жопыт и «было по-разному». И не важно на каком этапе ты сейчас находишься. Важно только одно — ты хочешь. Хочешь по-другому. Легче, ярче и скорее всего больше. Больше денег и реализации. Ярче эмоций. Свободы, лёгкости, любви — нужное подчеркни. Наша жизнь циклична. Радость сменяе…
❤13🍾8🙏5custom 51928704659572777601
В коммуникации примерно также. Только важен не баланс , а гибкость . Будешь мягким - съедят , принципиальным и жестким - избегать . И вот здесь нужно найти баланс между твердостью , без категоричного «я щитаю…» и тотальной гибкостью. Хотя если больших целей перед собой ставишь , то можно не заморачиваться. Гибкость в коммуникации нужна тем, кто пришел к пониманию и осознанию , что без умения одновременно договарива…
🔥19❤11custom 51928704659572777603😭1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥14custom 51928704659572777601
Все таки не перестаю удивляться многогранности нашей психики . Ибо с одной стороны , например, если твоя эмоциальная сфера наглухо заблокирована , то тебе и все равно на разные жизненные перепитии, с другой стороны и удовольствия нет . Точнее есть . Но головой. Понимаю , что вкусно. Понимаю , что отдыхаю . Но мало проваливается . Я так жил и знаю о чем это. Вкусно , потому что знаешь , что вкусно , а не потому что …
🔥14❤7🍾5custom 51928704659572777603🙏2
Раз , два , три … В моей жизни был момент, когда я был уверен , что на 109% контролирую реальность . Цели сбывались , все получалось , пусть и не по мановению волшебной палочки. Такие моменты мы часто называем белой полосой, иногда решаем , что это исключительно наша заслуга и выбор . Но как на самом деле? И то и то - иллюзия мозга. Да. Потому что потом начинается черная полоса , или наши решения не верные и наст…
🔥29❤9custom 51928704659572777604😈3🍓2
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @metodesnera. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Метод Эснера” (@metodesnera), 8,917 subscribers as measured 30 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/metodesnera.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.