Channel
@methodtrade
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,348subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002952857447 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @methodtrade |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/methodtrade |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 1,348 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 1,350 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 1,352 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:54 | 1,353 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 1,353 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
105 reactions across 10 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 44 | 41.9% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 16.2% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 11.4% | |
| 🫡 | 8 | 7.62% | |
| 🤨 | 7 | 6.67% | |
| 🌚 | 5 | 4.76% | |
| 🤪 | 5 | 4.76% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.952% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.952% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.952% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 0.952% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.952% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.952% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.952% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @methodtrade. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 May 2026 to 11 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Метод — это про оптимизацию. Торговли, времени на нее, и решений. И вот мы нашли ещё один вариант — покупку бандлами, которую внедрили буквально вчера. Это −30% на набор из самых топовых наших тс - что если не оптимизация. Так что тут можно выбрать только - all in📈 ССЫЛКА
❤7🔥4🎉1🖕1
Новые алерты в новом дизайне🔥📈
🤨7🤪5❤2🌚1🤩1
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤10
Недавно было прекрасное мероприятие - ежегодная сходка - заплыв на золотом дирижабле 🔥 И хоть постов у нас давно не было, Метод всё это время продолжал делать главное — находить и публиковать актуальные формации по мере активности рынка. В этом и есть главная ценность Метода. Можно подойти на пирс, и вместо просмотра алертов о плотностях на мексе, просто открыть метод, проверить актуальные формации, найденные ИИ…
❤5🔥2
#ИтогиМесяца —Количество алертов: 86 —Удачные алерты: 64 —Неудачные алерты: ~22 ТС с самым большим количеством детекций : local long (25) и short (24) -Продолжаем улучшать бекэнд алертов, чтобы они были стабильнее и точнее -Тестируем и подготавливаем к переходу новый дизайн с новыми доп фишками -Ждем вас на нашем сервисе и в комментариях! Каждый день все актуальные ситуации можно увидеть в Методе — без лишней тра…
❤8👍3🔥1
Как выглядит торговля по ТС метода SHORT. Выбрали и разобрали последние 3 ситуации!📈 Ситуация 1 ALLO Падение -> формирование четких лоев -> алерт при подходе к ним Интересная ситуация, нельзя сказать что идеальная и красивая, но алерты метода могут приходить еще в самом начале формирования сетапа, как только появились четкие касания и наторговываться еще долго, поэтому стоит смотреть Итог - (???) Сегодня вечером и…
❤3🔥1🕊1
Можно задаться вопросом: какая стратегия чаще всего появляется в Методе? Это ТС Short📈 За последний месяц ИИ нашел 30 таких ситуаций, и, думаю, стоит посвятить хотя бы один пост ее обсуждению. 🤨Суть стратегии довольно простая: сначала должна быть фаза падения перед формированием уровней, дальше — сами уровни, иногда с поджатием, и уже после этого приходит алерт перед пробоем. (Однако идеально точно описать логику …
❤7👍3🔥2
Очень неактивная неделя + бан от ркн = малое количество сетапов —Количество алертов: 20 —Суммарная прибыль: 60% ROI —Общий винрейт: ~80% ТС с самым большим количеством детекций (7): local long ТС с самым высоким средним ROI на одну ситуацию: global long (4%) Что сделали за эту неделю: —Разбирались с ркн🤨 —Уменьшили фильтрацию ИИ-модели, чтобы приходило больше ситуаций Продолжаем работать, постараемся сделать все …
👍5❤2🔥2🙏1
Еще вчера вечером разблочили✅
👍6
Ркн нас забанил, поэтому в течение ближайших 1-2 дней сервис будет на починке 😢 "получили бан по DPI (ТСПУ) в Иваново, админ передал заявку на разблокировку, рассмотрение 1-24 часа" Эти 1-2 дня обязательно возместим активным на текущий момент подписчикам📈
🫡8🌚4✍1😐1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @methodtrade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 121,714 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Method Platform” (@methodtrade), 1,348 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/methodtrade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.