Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Listings Metascalp

Channel

Listings Metascalp

@metascalp_announcements_ru

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

8,551subscribers

-70 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002022555844
TypeChannel
Username@metascalp_announcements_ru
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/metascalp_announcements_ru

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,5518,6228,586.57 August 2026 — 8,621 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,621 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,622 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,619 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,607 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,595 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,585 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,582 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,591 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,610 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,605 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,599 subscribers27 September 2026 — 8,586 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,562 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,551 subscribers7 August 202612 October 2026
15 measurements spanning 66 days, net -70. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,540–8,633 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 13:068,551-11
5 Oct 2026, 13:188,562-24
27 Sept 2026, 20:368,586-13
18 Sept 2026, 05:398,599-6
14 Sept 2026, 09:218,605-5
10 Sept 2026, 14:168,610+19
5 Sept 2026, 11:598,591+9
1 Sept 2026, 18:078,582-3
23 Aug 2026, 14:288,585-10
19 Aug 2026, 23:028,595-12
16 Aug 2026, 19:478,607-12
13 Aug 2026, 01:568,619-3
10 Aug 2026, 04:408,622+1
7 Aug 2026, 06:138,621no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:168,621first reading

Engagement

364 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 364 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

42 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1740.5%
❤1638.1%
🔥819.0%
🤩12.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 364 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 364 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC354 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

💯 Пинг маркет-даты в стакане Binance и Hiperliquid 🎞 Видео: https://youtube.com/shorts/kmNk8V2lZ24?feature=share Для стаканов Binance и Hyperliquid добавили отображение текущего пинга маркет-даты. Чтобы включить отображение: — открываем настройки стакана или подключения; — переходим во вкладку «Общее»; — включаем «Отображать пинг маркет-даты». После этого в левом верхнем углу стакана будет отображаться текущее зн…

👍5

28 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC324 viewsread 28 August 2026

⏰ Available for trading ✅ BASELINEUSDT: MEXC (S) 1️⃣

Showing the 12 most recent of 364 posts we hold for @metascalp_announcements_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@metascalp_announcements_ru edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Listings Metascalp” (@metascalp_announcements_ru), 8,551 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/metascalp_announcements_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.