Channel
@metametalamp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
195subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001975766091 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @metametalamp |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/metametalamp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 195 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 193 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 193 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 27 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
212 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 66 | 31.1% | |
| 👍 | 54 | 25.5% | |
| ❤ | 24 | 11.3% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 7.08% | |
| 😱 | 13 | 6.13% | |
| 🦄 | 12 | 5.66% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 3.77% | |
| 🌚 | 7 | 3.30% | |
| 👾 | 6 | 2.83% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.42% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.943% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.943% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 212reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2025 to 6 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @metametalamp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 January 2025 to 6 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤟 Kicking off the year at Consensus Hong Kong The first major event of the year is not to be missed! Yana Gendrovich, our BDM, is heading to Consensus Hong Kong. 🗓 February 10–12, Hong Kong The plan is the usual: connect with builders, scout out plans and narratives for the year. We’ll be attending both the main conference and the side events: 📍 Tokenized Capital Summit 2026 Hong Kong 📍 The Realized Summit by 499…
🔥6👍2🏆1
Big thanks to Roman Yarlykov, Solidity smart contract dev at MetaLamp, for the deep dive into Algebra 🙌 From the Algebra DEX ecosystem to the Uniswap rivalry & beyond – all in one piece on modular DEX-as-a-service, plugins & dynamic fees. Available here.
🔥4💯2🏆1
🤟 Final Trip of the Year Wrapping up the year in style: Nico Bordunenko and Artem Nuraev are packing their bags and heading to Dubai next week for Binance Blockchain Week. Besides the main event, the guys will be hitting some side events too. Here's the current plan: December 2: 🙌 The Tokenized Future Dubai RWA 🙌 DWF Labs Haus: Binance Blockchain Week 2025 December 3–4: 🙌 Main Event Binance Blockchain Week Decem…
👍3🔥2👏1
Once and for all — which chain should you actually launch on? Yeah, I know. Overused topic. But we still get asked this all the time — and honestly, the answer isn’t always obvious. Let’s narrow it down to EVM chains — that’s where 99% of founders get stuck anyway. This post came after a call with an RWA project. They started on Ethereum (makes sense: big liquidity, solid infra, battle-tested). Later partners updat…
🔥4👍2👏1
🤟 September conference update! Our BDM Yana is heading to Korea Blockchain Week — one of the key crypto events in Asia this year. She’ll be at the main conference and plenty of side events: panels, meetups, and everything in between. If you’re in Seoul between Sept 22–28, feel free to reach out! Want to talk Web3, share what you're building, or hear about what we’re up to at MetaLamp — ping Yana to connect 🤝 🇰🇷 …
❤8👍5🔥2
We’re actively building out both online and offline web3 events to help the community connect, grow, and meet — with us and with each other. That’s why tomorrow in Belgrade we’re hosting a side event as part of Belgrade Blockchain Week 🤟 Expect laid-back networking, real conversations, and a walk through the greenery of Kalemegdan Park. If you’re in town — swing by, we’d love to see you: https://lu.ma/ujteyo31 No…
👍5🔥3🦄3
📣 Today is all about conference news! Our BDM Greg is heading to Belgrade Blockchain Week! A whole week of awesome events, meetups, projects, and crypto enthusiasts — with ETH Belgrade as the main highlight! If you want to chat in person, pitch an idea, learn more about our team, or just talk Web3 — hit him up, Greg will be happy to connect! ⚡️ And yeah, we’re also hosting our own side event during Belgrade Block…
🔥5👍2👾2
CoW Swap: The DEX Where Matching Desires Saves You Money CoW Protocol and its interface CoW Swap form a meta-DEX system available on Ethereum, Gnosis Chain, Base, and Arbitrum One — offering an innovative approach to token trading. 🙌 What is CoW Protocol? At its core is the principle of CoW — Coincidence of Wants — which enables users to swap tokens directly with one another. Imagine this: Alice wants to sell ETH …
👍4👾3🔥2❤1
🎧 Ordered a podcast on Pendle? We’ve been getting a few requests lately related to building around yield trading protocols like Pendle — so naturally, we’ve been digging into it. Well... “we”... mostly Pasha Naidanov 🤣 (smash that like if you’re waiting for his article on Pendle). As for me, I’m just waiting for him to drop it so I can read it, nitpick something during the review stage, and then confidently claim I …
🌚3👍3🔥3
🪙 Nobody Needs Crypto or Blockchain (…or do they?) Now AI — that’s the real future! But this so-called blockchain of yours? Just another scammy crypto fad 🤢. It’s been around for years and what has it actually done? Just speculation, clunky UX, useless decentralization, etc. Had to get into this argument with a friend again recently. Let me say up front: I have no illusions about blockchain ushering in a bright uto…
👍5🌚4🔥3🦄1
🔥 Bittensor EVM: How I Tried to Deploy a Contract and Lost All My Nerves I decided to test out the EVM support on the Bittensor blockchain. The plan was simple: deploy a contract to the Bittensor EVM testnet. Should be easy, right? There's a guide, there's a faucet, there's motivation… But not so fast! 😅 🧩 The “Get Your TAO” Quest Step one — getting some test tokens. But don’t assume it’s straightforward: 1️⃣ Tur…
🔥5😁3👍2😢2
(Picking up from part one ⬆️) ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Quick Queries in the Code Hit up Composer or Chat right on a code line. I lean on this when: 🟠 I blank on a framework function name, and auto-complete’s no help—or worse, wrong. Beats digging through docs! 🟠I’m untangling someone else’s code and need a quick “what does this do?” 🟠 I’m translating names or decoding the author’s intent (especially with creative naming). ⭐️⭐…
👍4👏3🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @metametalamp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MetaLamp | Web3 DevTeam” (@metametalamp), 195 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/metametalamp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.